Detection of concealed information by P3 and frontal EEG asymmetry

Izumi Matsuda, Hiroshi Nittono, John JB Allen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

15 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Psychophysiological detection of deception has seen increased attention in both research and applied settings. In this field, the most scientifically validated paradigm is the Concealed Information Test (CIT). The CIT does not directly deal with whether a participant is lying, but examines whether a participant recognizes a critical relevant detail, inferred by differences in physiological responses between critical and non-critical items. Although event-related potential (ERP) approaches to the CIT have shown high accuracy, a combination of measures might improve the test's performance. We thus assessed whether a new CIT index, frontal EEG asymmetry that is supposed to reflect differences in approach/withdrawal motivation, would prove useful. Nineteen participants were asked to steal one item in a mock crime, and were then administered two CITs while concealing the stolen item. One CIT included the stolen item (i.e., guilty condition), whereas the other CIT did not (i.e., innocent condition). In the guilty condition, the concealed stolen item elicited greater relative left frontal alpha activity (indicative of relative right frontal cortical activity) as compared to the other items, suggesting that the recognition of the concealed item might have induced withdrawal motivation. Although the discrimination between guilty and innocent conditions by the asymmetry score alone was not as good as that by the ERP P3 index, combining the asymmetry score and P3 improved the detection performance significantly. The results suggest that the frontal EEG asymmetry can be used as a new measure in the CIT that provides additional information beyond that captured by the traditional ERP index.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)55-59
Number of pages5
JournalNeuroscience Letters
Volume537
DOIs
StatePublished - 2013

Fingerprint

Evoked Potentials
Motivation
Electroencephalography
P300 Event-Related Potentials
Crime
Deception
Research

Keywords

  • Concealed Information Test (CIT)
  • Event-related potential (ERP)
  • Frontal EEG asymmetry
  • P3
  • Withdrawal motivation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Neuroscience(all)

Cite this

Detection of concealed information by P3 and frontal EEG asymmetry. / Matsuda, Izumi; Nittono, Hiroshi; Allen, John JB.

In: Neuroscience Letters, Vol. 537, 2013, p. 55-59.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Matsuda, Izumi ; Nittono, Hiroshi ; Allen, John JB. / Detection of concealed information by P3 and frontal EEG asymmetry. In: Neuroscience Letters. 2013 ; Vol. 537. pp. 55-59.
@article{be4f4517471b4852a4e931799278fa88,
title = "Detection of concealed information by P3 and frontal EEG asymmetry",
abstract = "Psychophysiological detection of deception has seen increased attention in both research and applied settings. In this field, the most scientifically validated paradigm is the Concealed Information Test (CIT). The CIT does not directly deal with whether a participant is lying, but examines whether a participant recognizes a critical relevant detail, inferred by differences in physiological responses between critical and non-critical items. Although event-related potential (ERP) approaches to the CIT have shown high accuracy, a combination of measures might improve the test's performance. We thus assessed whether a new CIT index, frontal EEG asymmetry that is supposed to reflect differences in approach/withdrawal motivation, would prove useful. Nineteen participants were asked to steal one item in a mock crime, and were then administered two CITs while concealing the stolen item. One CIT included the stolen item (i.e., guilty condition), whereas the other CIT did not (i.e., innocent condition). In the guilty condition, the concealed stolen item elicited greater relative left frontal alpha activity (indicative of relative right frontal cortical activity) as compared to the other items, suggesting that the recognition of the concealed item might have induced withdrawal motivation. Although the discrimination between guilty and innocent conditions by the asymmetry score alone was not as good as that by the ERP P3 index, combining the asymmetry score and P3 improved the detection performance significantly. The results suggest that the frontal EEG asymmetry can be used as a new measure in the CIT that provides additional information beyond that captured by the traditional ERP index.",
keywords = "Concealed Information Test (CIT), Event-related potential (ERP), Frontal EEG asymmetry, P3, Withdrawal motivation",
author = "Izumi Matsuda and Hiroshi Nittono and Allen, {John JB}",
year = "2013",
doi = "10.1016/j.neulet.2013.01.029",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "537",
pages = "55--59",
journal = "Neuroscience Letters",
issn = "0304-3940",
publisher = "Elsevier Ireland Ltd",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Detection of concealed information by P3 and frontal EEG asymmetry

AU - Matsuda, Izumi

AU - Nittono, Hiroshi

AU - Allen, John JB

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - Psychophysiological detection of deception has seen increased attention in both research and applied settings. In this field, the most scientifically validated paradigm is the Concealed Information Test (CIT). The CIT does not directly deal with whether a participant is lying, but examines whether a participant recognizes a critical relevant detail, inferred by differences in physiological responses between critical and non-critical items. Although event-related potential (ERP) approaches to the CIT have shown high accuracy, a combination of measures might improve the test's performance. We thus assessed whether a new CIT index, frontal EEG asymmetry that is supposed to reflect differences in approach/withdrawal motivation, would prove useful. Nineteen participants were asked to steal one item in a mock crime, and were then administered two CITs while concealing the stolen item. One CIT included the stolen item (i.e., guilty condition), whereas the other CIT did not (i.e., innocent condition). In the guilty condition, the concealed stolen item elicited greater relative left frontal alpha activity (indicative of relative right frontal cortical activity) as compared to the other items, suggesting that the recognition of the concealed item might have induced withdrawal motivation. Although the discrimination between guilty and innocent conditions by the asymmetry score alone was not as good as that by the ERP P3 index, combining the asymmetry score and P3 improved the detection performance significantly. The results suggest that the frontal EEG asymmetry can be used as a new measure in the CIT that provides additional information beyond that captured by the traditional ERP index.

AB - Psychophysiological detection of deception has seen increased attention in both research and applied settings. In this field, the most scientifically validated paradigm is the Concealed Information Test (CIT). The CIT does not directly deal with whether a participant is lying, but examines whether a participant recognizes a critical relevant detail, inferred by differences in physiological responses between critical and non-critical items. Although event-related potential (ERP) approaches to the CIT have shown high accuracy, a combination of measures might improve the test's performance. We thus assessed whether a new CIT index, frontal EEG asymmetry that is supposed to reflect differences in approach/withdrawal motivation, would prove useful. Nineteen participants were asked to steal one item in a mock crime, and were then administered two CITs while concealing the stolen item. One CIT included the stolen item (i.e., guilty condition), whereas the other CIT did not (i.e., innocent condition). In the guilty condition, the concealed stolen item elicited greater relative left frontal alpha activity (indicative of relative right frontal cortical activity) as compared to the other items, suggesting that the recognition of the concealed item might have induced withdrawal motivation. Although the discrimination between guilty and innocent conditions by the asymmetry score alone was not as good as that by the ERP P3 index, combining the asymmetry score and P3 improved the detection performance significantly. The results suggest that the frontal EEG asymmetry can be used as a new measure in the CIT that provides additional information beyond that captured by the traditional ERP index.

KW - Concealed Information Test (CIT)

KW - Event-related potential (ERP)

KW - Frontal EEG asymmetry

KW - P3

KW - Withdrawal motivation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84874366318&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84874366318&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.neulet.2013.01.029

DO - 10.1016/j.neulet.2013.01.029

M3 - Article

C2 - 23370285

AN - SCOPUS:84874366318

VL - 537

SP - 55

EP - 59

JO - Neuroscience Letters

JF - Neuroscience Letters

SN - 0304-3940

ER -