Detection of sinusoidal amplitude modulation at unexpected rates

Beverly A. Wright, Huanping Dai

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

16 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The detectability of sinusoidal amplitude modulation at unexpected modulation rates was assessed using a probe-signal method. With this method, three listeners were led to expect a target modulation rate (4, 32, or 256 Hz) by presenting the signal most often at that rate, and sensitivity to modulation at six other unexpected rates between 4 and 256 Hz was measured via occasionally presented probe modulation rates. The modulation phase was random on each two-interval forced-choice trial and the overall level of the 500-ms broadband carder was randomly varied between 55 and 75 dB SPL across intervals. The modulation depth at each rate was set so that the modulation was detected on about 90% of the trials when only that rate was presented. Performance at the unexpected rates depended upon the target rate. For the 4- Hz target, modulation at all rates was detected on about 80% of the trials. For the 32- and 256-Hz targets, unexpected modulation rates of 16 Hz and above were detected on 80%-90% of the trials, but modulation rates below 16 Hz were detected nearly at chance. The influence of expectation of modulation rate on the detection of sinusoidal amplitude modulation is not readily predicted by current models of modulation detection.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)2991-2996
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of the Acoustical Society of America
Volume104
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 1998
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

modulation
Modulation
intervals
probes
cards
phase modulation
broadband
sensitivity

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Acoustics and Ultrasonics

Cite this

Detection of sinusoidal amplitude modulation at unexpected rates. / Wright, Beverly A.; Dai, Huanping.

In: Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, Vol. 104, No. 5, 11.1998, p. 2991-2996.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{099353f7274f42d799904b9f7713fc1c,
title = "Detection of sinusoidal amplitude modulation at unexpected rates",
abstract = "The detectability of sinusoidal amplitude modulation at unexpected modulation rates was assessed using a probe-signal method. With this method, three listeners were led to expect a target modulation rate (4, 32, or 256 Hz) by presenting the signal most often at that rate, and sensitivity to modulation at six other unexpected rates between 4 and 256 Hz was measured via occasionally presented probe modulation rates. The modulation phase was random on each two-interval forced-choice trial and the overall level of the 500-ms broadband carder was randomly varied between 55 and 75 dB SPL across intervals. The modulation depth at each rate was set so that the modulation was detected on about 90{\%} of the trials when only that rate was presented. Performance at the unexpected rates depended upon the target rate. For the 4- Hz target, modulation at all rates was detected on about 80{\%} of the trials. For the 32- and 256-Hz targets, unexpected modulation rates of 16 Hz and above were detected on 80{\%}-90{\%} of the trials, but modulation rates below 16 Hz were detected nearly at chance. The influence of expectation of modulation rate on the detection of sinusoidal amplitude modulation is not readily predicted by current models of modulation detection.",
author = "Wright, {Beverly A.} and Huanping Dai",
year = "1998",
month = "11",
doi = "10.1121/1.423881",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "104",
pages = "2991--2996",
journal = "Journal of the Acoustical Society of America",
issn = "0001-4966",
publisher = "Acoustical Society of America",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Detection of sinusoidal amplitude modulation at unexpected rates

AU - Wright, Beverly A.

AU - Dai, Huanping

PY - 1998/11

Y1 - 1998/11

N2 - The detectability of sinusoidal amplitude modulation at unexpected modulation rates was assessed using a probe-signal method. With this method, three listeners were led to expect a target modulation rate (4, 32, or 256 Hz) by presenting the signal most often at that rate, and sensitivity to modulation at six other unexpected rates between 4 and 256 Hz was measured via occasionally presented probe modulation rates. The modulation phase was random on each two-interval forced-choice trial and the overall level of the 500-ms broadband carder was randomly varied between 55 and 75 dB SPL across intervals. The modulation depth at each rate was set so that the modulation was detected on about 90% of the trials when only that rate was presented. Performance at the unexpected rates depended upon the target rate. For the 4- Hz target, modulation at all rates was detected on about 80% of the trials. For the 32- and 256-Hz targets, unexpected modulation rates of 16 Hz and above were detected on 80%-90% of the trials, but modulation rates below 16 Hz were detected nearly at chance. The influence of expectation of modulation rate on the detection of sinusoidal amplitude modulation is not readily predicted by current models of modulation detection.

AB - The detectability of sinusoidal amplitude modulation at unexpected modulation rates was assessed using a probe-signal method. With this method, three listeners were led to expect a target modulation rate (4, 32, or 256 Hz) by presenting the signal most often at that rate, and sensitivity to modulation at six other unexpected rates between 4 and 256 Hz was measured via occasionally presented probe modulation rates. The modulation phase was random on each two-interval forced-choice trial and the overall level of the 500-ms broadband carder was randomly varied between 55 and 75 dB SPL across intervals. The modulation depth at each rate was set so that the modulation was detected on about 90% of the trials when only that rate was presented. Performance at the unexpected rates depended upon the target rate. For the 4- Hz target, modulation at all rates was detected on about 80% of the trials. For the 32- and 256-Hz targets, unexpected modulation rates of 16 Hz and above were detected on 80%-90% of the trials, but modulation rates below 16 Hz were detected nearly at chance. The influence of expectation of modulation rate on the detection of sinusoidal amplitude modulation is not readily predicted by current models of modulation detection.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0031734125&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0031734125&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1121/1.423881

DO - 10.1121/1.423881

M3 - Article

C2 - 9821343

AN - SCOPUS:0031734125

VL - 104

SP - 2991

EP - 2996

JO - Journal of the Acoustical Society of America

JF - Journal of the Acoustical Society of America

SN - 0001-4966

IS - 5

ER -