Detection of visual stimuli on monocular peripheral head-worn displays

Michael T. Pascale, Penelope Sanderson, David Liu, Ismail Mohamed, Nicola Stigter, Robert G Loeb

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: To compare people's ability to detect peripherally presented stimuli on a monocular head-worn display (HWD) versus a conventional screen. Background: Visual attention capture has been systematically investigated, but not with respect to HWDs. How stimulus properties affect attention capture is likely to be different on an HWD when compared to a traditional computer display. Method: Participants performed an ongoing perceptual task and attempted to detect stimuli that were displayed peripherally on either a computer monitor or a monocular HWD. Results: Participants were less able to detect peripheral stimuli when the stimuli were presented on a HWD than when presented on a computer monitor. Moreover, the disadvantage of the HWD was more pronounced when peripheral stimuli were less distinct and when the stimuli were presented further into the periphery. Conclusion: Presenting stimuli on a monocular head-worn display reduces participants’ ability to notice peripheral visual stimuli compared to presentation on a normal computer monitor. This effect increases as stimuli are presented further in the periphery, but can be ameliorated to a degree by using high-contrast stimuli. Application: The findings are useful for designers creating visual stimuli intended to capture attention when viewed on a peripherally positioned monocular head-worn display.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)167-173
Number of pages7
JournalApplied Ergonomics
Volume73
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 1 2018
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

stimulus
Display devices
Head
Computer monitors
ability

Keywords

  • Attention
  • Google Glass
  • Head-worn displays
  • Monitoring
  • Perception

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Human Factors and Ergonomics
  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation
  • Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality
  • Engineering (miscellaneous)

Cite this

Detection of visual stimuli on monocular peripheral head-worn displays. / Pascale, Michael T.; Sanderson, Penelope; Liu, David; Mohamed, Ismail; Stigter, Nicola; Loeb, Robert G.

In: Applied Ergonomics, Vol. 73, 01.11.2018, p. 167-173.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Pascale, Michael T. ; Sanderson, Penelope ; Liu, David ; Mohamed, Ismail ; Stigter, Nicola ; Loeb, Robert G. / Detection of visual stimuli on monocular peripheral head-worn displays. In: Applied Ergonomics. 2018 ; Vol. 73. pp. 167-173.
@article{a4fa4be82ec04169be4a181d28df780d,
title = "Detection of visual stimuli on monocular peripheral head-worn displays",
abstract = "Objective: To compare people's ability to detect peripherally presented stimuli on a monocular head-worn display (HWD) versus a conventional screen. Background: Visual attention capture has been systematically investigated, but not with respect to HWDs. How stimulus properties affect attention capture is likely to be different on an HWD when compared to a traditional computer display. Method: Participants performed an ongoing perceptual task and attempted to detect stimuli that were displayed peripherally on either a computer monitor or a monocular HWD. Results: Participants were less able to detect peripheral stimuli when the stimuli were presented on a HWD than when presented on a computer monitor. Moreover, the disadvantage of the HWD was more pronounced when peripheral stimuli were less distinct and when the stimuli were presented further into the periphery. Conclusion: Presenting stimuli on a monocular head-worn display reduces participants’ ability to notice peripheral visual stimuli compared to presentation on a normal computer monitor. This effect increases as stimuli are presented further in the periphery, but can be ameliorated to a degree by using high-contrast stimuli. Application: The findings are useful for designers creating visual stimuli intended to capture attention when viewed on a peripherally positioned monocular head-worn display.",
keywords = "Attention, Google Glass, Head-worn displays, Monitoring, Perception",
author = "Pascale, {Michael T.} and Penelope Sanderson and David Liu and Ismail Mohamed and Nicola Stigter and Loeb, {Robert G}",
year = "2018",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.apergo.2018.06.002",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "73",
pages = "167--173",
journal = "Applied Ergonomics",
issn = "0003-6870",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Detection of visual stimuli on monocular peripheral head-worn displays

AU - Pascale, Michael T.

AU - Sanderson, Penelope

AU - Liu, David

AU - Mohamed, Ismail

AU - Stigter, Nicola

AU - Loeb, Robert G

PY - 2018/11/1

Y1 - 2018/11/1

N2 - Objective: To compare people's ability to detect peripherally presented stimuli on a monocular head-worn display (HWD) versus a conventional screen. Background: Visual attention capture has been systematically investigated, but not with respect to HWDs. How stimulus properties affect attention capture is likely to be different on an HWD when compared to a traditional computer display. Method: Participants performed an ongoing perceptual task and attempted to detect stimuli that were displayed peripherally on either a computer monitor or a monocular HWD. Results: Participants were less able to detect peripheral stimuli when the stimuli were presented on a HWD than when presented on a computer monitor. Moreover, the disadvantage of the HWD was more pronounced when peripheral stimuli were less distinct and when the stimuli were presented further into the periphery. Conclusion: Presenting stimuli on a monocular head-worn display reduces participants’ ability to notice peripheral visual stimuli compared to presentation on a normal computer monitor. This effect increases as stimuli are presented further in the periphery, but can be ameliorated to a degree by using high-contrast stimuli. Application: The findings are useful for designers creating visual stimuli intended to capture attention when viewed on a peripherally positioned monocular head-worn display.

AB - Objective: To compare people's ability to detect peripherally presented stimuli on a monocular head-worn display (HWD) versus a conventional screen. Background: Visual attention capture has been systematically investigated, but not with respect to HWDs. How stimulus properties affect attention capture is likely to be different on an HWD when compared to a traditional computer display. Method: Participants performed an ongoing perceptual task and attempted to detect stimuli that were displayed peripherally on either a computer monitor or a monocular HWD. Results: Participants were less able to detect peripheral stimuli when the stimuli were presented on a HWD than when presented on a computer monitor. Moreover, the disadvantage of the HWD was more pronounced when peripheral stimuli were less distinct and when the stimuli were presented further into the periphery. Conclusion: Presenting stimuli on a monocular head-worn display reduces participants’ ability to notice peripheral visual stimuli compared to presentation on a normal computer monitor. This effect increases as stimuli are presented further in the periphery, but can be ameliorated to a degree by using high-contrast stimuli. Application: The findings are useful for designers creating visual stimuli intended to capture attention when viewed on a peripherally positioned monocular head-worn display.

KW - Attention

KW - Google Glass

KW - Head-worn displays

KW - Monitoring

KW - Perception

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85049994538&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85049994538&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.apergo.2018.06.002

DO - 10.1016/j.apergo.2018.06.002

M3 - Article

C2 - 30098632

AN - SCOPUS:85049994538

VL - 73

SP - 167

EP - 173

JO - Applied Ergonomics

JF - Applied Ergonomics

SN - 0003-6870

ER -