Determinants of CEO Pay

A comparison of ExecuComp and non-ExecuComp firms

Brian Cadman, Sandy J Klasa, Steve Matsunaga

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

41 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We document that firms included in the ExecuComp database tend to be larger, more complex, followed by more analysts, have greater stock liquidity levels, and have higher total, but less concentrated, institutional ownership than other firms. Based on these differences, we test and find support for three predictions. First, ExecuComp firms rely more heavily on earnings and stock returns in determining CEO cash compensation. Second, the weight on earnings is more sensitive to differences in the extent of growth opportunities for ExecuComp firms. Third, the positive relation between institutional ownership concentration and the value of stock option grants is stronger for ExecuComp firms. Overall, our results suggest that ExecuComp and nonExecuComp firms operate in different contracting environments that lead to differences in the design of their executive compensation contracts. As a result, care should be taken in extending results based on ExecuComp samples to non-ExecuComp firms.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1511-1543
Number of pages33
JournalAccounting Review
Volume85
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2010

Fingerprint

CEO pay
Institutional ownership
Chief executive officer
Prediction
Liquidity
Stock returns
Growth opportunities
Contracting
Analysts
Cash
Executive compensation
Ownership concentration
Data base
Stock option grants

Keywords

  • Contracting environment
  • ExecuComp database
  • Executive compensation
  • Stock option grants

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Finance
  • Accounting
  • Economics and Econometrics

Cite this

Determinants of CEO Pay : A comparison of ExecuComp and non-ExecuComp firms. / Cadman, Brian; Klasa, Sandy J; Matsunaga, Steve.

In: Accounting Review, Vol. 85, No. 5, 09.2010, p. 1511-1543.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Cadman, Brian ; Klasa, Sandy J ; Matsunaga, Steve. / Determinants of CEO Pay : A comparison of ExecuComp and non-ExecuComp firms. In: Accounting Review. 2010 ; Vol. 85, No. 5. pp. 1511-1543.
@article{4e946e4c9a8944a2bac3cc236eda6ff4,
title = "Determinants of CEO Pay: A comparison of ExecuComp and non-ExecuComp firms",
abstract = "We document that firms included in the ExecuComp database tend to be larger, more complex, followed by more analysts, have greater stock liquidity levels, and have higher total, but less concentrated, institutional ownership than other firms. Based on these differences, we test and find support for three predictions. First, ExecuComp firms rely more heavily on earnings and stock returns in determining CEO cash compensation. Second, the weight on earnings is more sensitive to differences in the extent of growth opportunities for ExecuComp firms. Third, the positive relation between institutional ownership concentration and the value of stock option grants is stronger for ExecuComp firms. Overall, our results suggest that ExecuComp and nonExecuComp firms operate in different contracting environments that lead to differences in the design of their executive compensation contracts. As a result, care should be taken in extending results based on ExecuComp samples to non-ExecuComp firms.",
keywords = "Contracting environment, ExecuComp database, Executive compensation, Stock option grants",
author = "Brian Cadman and Klasa, {Sandy J} and Steve Matsunaga",
year = "2010",
month = "9",
doi = "10.2308/accr.2010.85.5.1511",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "85",
pages = "1511--1543",
journal = "Accounting Review",
issn = "0001-4826",
publisher = "American Accounting Association",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Determinants of CEO Pay

T2 - A comparison of ExecuComp and non-ExecuComp firms

AU - Cadman, Brian

AU - Klasa, Sandy J

AU - Matsunaga, Steve

PY - 2010/9

Y1 - 2010/9

N2 - We document that firms included in the ExecuComp database tend to be larger, more complex, followed by more analysts, have greater stock liquidity levels, and have higher total, but less concentrated, institutional ownership than other firms. Based on these differences, we test and find support for three predictions. First, ExecuComp firms rely more heavily on earnings and stock returns in determining CEO cash compensation. Second, the weight on earnings is more sensitive to differences in the extent of growth opportunities for ExecuComp firms. Third, the positive relation between institutional ownership concentration and the value of stock option grants is stronger for ExecuComp firms. Overall, our results suggest that ExecuComp and nonExecuComp firms operate in different contracting environments that lead to differences in the design of their executive compensation contracts. As a result, care should be taken in extending results based on ExecuComp samples to non-ExecuComp firms.

AB - We document that firms included in the ExecuComp database tend to be larger, more complex, followed by more analysts, have greater stock liquidity levels, and have higher total, but less concentrated, institutional ownership than other firms. Based on these differences, we test and find support for three predictions. First, ExecuComp firms rely more heavily on earnings and stock returns in determining CEO cash compensation. Second, the weight on earnings is more sensitive to differences in the extent of growth opportunities for ExecuComp firms. Third, the positive relation between institutional ownership concentration and the value of stock option grants is stronger for ExecuComp firms. Overall, our results suggest that ExecuComp and nonExecuComp firms operate in different contracting environments that lead to differences in the design of their executive compensation contracts. As a result, care should be taken in extending results based on ExecuComp samples to non-ExecuComp firms.

KW - Contracting environment

KW - ExecuComp database

KW - Executive compensation

KW - Stock option grants

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77958458351&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77958458351&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.2308/accr.2010.85.5.1511

DO - 10.2308/accr.2010.85.5.1511

M3 - Article

VL - 85

SP - 1511

EP - 1543

JO - Accounting Review

JF - Accounting Review

SN - 0001-4826

IS - 5

ER -