Development of a photographic scale for consistency and guidance in dermatologic assessment of forearm sun damage

Naja E. McKenzie, Kathylynn Saboda, Laura D. Duckett, Rayna Goldman, Chengcheng Hu, Clara N Curiel

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives: To develop a photographic sun damage assessment scale for forearm skin and test its feasibility and utility for consistent classification of sun damage. Design: For a blinded comparison, 96 standardized 8x10 digital photographs of participants' forearms were taken. Photographs were graded by an expert dermatologist using an existing 9-category dermatologic assessment scoring scale until all categories contained photographs representative of each of 4 clinical signs. Triplicate photographs were provided in identical image sets to 5 community dermatologists for blinded rating using the dermatologic assessment scoring scale. Setting: Academic skin cancer prevention clinic with high-level experience in assessment of sun-damaged skin. Participants: Volunteer sample including participants from screenings, chemoprevention, and/or biomarker studies. Main Outcome Measures: Reproducibility and agreement of grading among dermatologists by Spearman correlation coefficient to assess the correlation of scores given for the same photograph, κ statistics for ordinal data, and variability of scoring among dermatologists, using analysis of variance models with evaluating physician and photographs as main effects and interaction effect variables to account for the difference in scoring among dermatologists. Results: Correlations (73% to >90%) between dermatologists were all statistically significant (P<.001). Scores showed good to substantial agreement but were significantly different (P<.001) for each of 4 clinical signs and the difference varied significantly (P<.001) among photographs. Conclusions: With good to substantial agreement, we found the development of a photographic forearm sun damage assessment scale highly feasible. In view of significantly different rating scores, a photographic reference for assessment of sun damage is also necessary.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)31-36
Number of pages6
JournalArchives of Dermatology
Volume147
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2011

Fingerprint

Solar System
Forearm
Chemoprevention
Skin Neoplasms
Skin Tests
Dermatologists
Volunteers
Analysis of Variance
Biomarkers
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Physicians
Skin

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Dermatology

Cite this

Development of a photographic scale for consistency and guidance in dermatologic assessment of forearm sun damage. / McKenzie, Naja E.; Saboda, Kathylynn; Duckett, Laura D.; Goldman, Rayna; Hu, Chengcheng; Curiel, Clara N.

In: Archives of Dermatology, Vol. 147, No. 1, 01.2011, p. 31-36.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

McKenzie, Naja E. ; Saboda, Kathylynn ; Duckett, Laura D. ; Goldman, Rayna ; Hu, Chengcheng ; Curiel, Clara N. / Development of a photographic scale for consistency and guidance in dermatologic assessment of forearm sun damage. In: Archives of Dermatology. 2011 ; Vol. 147, No. 1. pp. 31-36.
@article{e0e769756bdf4a85941f689d1f03181d,
title = "Development of a photographic scale for consistency and guidance in dermatologic assessment of forearm sun damage",
abstract = "Objectives: To develop a photographic sun damage assessment scale for forearm skin and test its feasibility and utility for consistent classification of sun damage. Design: For a blinded comparison, 96 standardized 8x10 digital photographs of participants' forearms were taken. Photographs were graded by an expert dermatologist using an existing 9-category dermatologic assessment scoring scale until all categories contained photographs representative of each of 4 clinical signs. Triplicate photographs were provided in identical image sets to 5 community dermatologists for blinded rating using the dermatologic assessment scoring scale. Setting: Academic skin cancer prevention clinic with high-level experience in assessment of sun-damaged skin. Participants: Volunteer sample including participants from screenings, chemoprevention, and/or biomarker studies. Main Outcome Measures: Reproducibility and agreement of grading among dermatologists by Spearman correlation coefficient to assess the correlation of scores given for the same photograph, κ statistics for ordinal data, and variability of scoring among dermatologists, using analysis of variance models with evaluating physician and photographs as main effects and interaction effect variables to account for the difference in scoring among dermatologists. Results: Correlations (73{\%} to >90{\%}) between dermatologists were all statistically significant (P<.001). Scores showed good to substantial agreement but were significantly different (P<.001) for each of 4 clinical signs and the difference varied significantly (P<.001) among photographs. Conclusions: With good to substantial agreement, we found the development of a photographic forearm sun damage assessment scale highly feasible. In view of significantly different rating scores, a photographic reference for assessment of sun damage is also necessary.",
author = "McKenzie, {Naja E.} and Kathylynn Saboda and Duckett, {Laura D.} and Rayna Goldman and Chengcheng Hu and Curiel, {Clara N}",
year = "2011",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1001/archdermatol.2010.392",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "147",
pages = "31--36",
journal = "JAMA Dermatology",
issn = "2168-6068",
publisher = "American Medical Association",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Development of a photographic scale for consistency and guidance in dermatologic assessment of forearm sun damage

AU - McKenzie, Naja E.

AU - Saboda, Kathylynn

AU - Duckett, Laura D.

AU - Goldman, Rayna

AU - Hu, Chengcheng

AU - Curiel, Clara N

PY - 2011/1

Y1 - 2011/1

N2 - Objectives: To develop a photographic sun damage assessment scale for forearm skin and test its feasibility and utility for consistent classification of sun damage. Design: For a blinded comparison, 96 standardized 8x10 digital photographs of participants' forearms were taken. Photographs were graded by an expert dermatologist using an existing 9-category dermatologic assessment scoring scale until all categories contained photographs representative of each of 4 clinical signs. Triplicate photographs were provided in identical image sets to 5 community dermatologists for blinded rating using the dermatologic assessment scoring scale. Setting: Academic skin cancer prevention clinic with high-level experience in assessment of sun-damaged skin. Participants: Volunteer sample including participants from screenings, chemoprevention, and/or biomarker studies. Main Outcome Measures: Reproducibility and agreement of grading among dermatologists by Spearman correlation coefficient to assess the correlation of scores given for the same photograph, κ statistics for ordinal data, and variability of scoring among dermatologists, using analysis of variance models with evaluating physician and photographs as main effects and interaction effect variables to account for the difference in scoring among dermatologists. Results: Correlations (73% to >90%) between dermatologists were all statistically significant (P<.001). Scores showed good to substantial agreement but were significantly different (P<.001) for each of 4 clinical signs and the difference varied significantly (P<.001) among photographs. Conclusions: With good to substantial agreement, we found the development of a photographic forearm sun damage assessment scale highly feasible. In view of significantly different rating scores, a photographic reference for assessment of sun damage is also necessary.

AB - Objectives: To develop a photographic sun damage assessment scale for forearm skin and test its feasibility and utility for consistent classification of sun damage. Design: For a blinded comparison, 96 standardized 8x10 digital photographs of participants' forearms were taken. Photographs were graded by an expert dermatologist using an existing 9-category dermatologic assessment scoring scale until all categories contained photographs representative of each of 4 clinical signs. Triplicate photographs were provided in identical image sets to 5 community dermatologists for blinded rating using the dermatologic assessment scoring scale. Setting: Academic skin cancer prevention clinic with high-level experience in assessment of sun-damaged skin. Participants: Volunteer sample including participants from screenings, chemoprevention, and/or biomarker studies. Main Outcome Measures: Reproducibility and agreement of grading among dermatologists by Spearman correlation coefficient to assess the correlation of scores given for the same photograph, κ statistics for ordinal data, and variability of scoring among dermatologists, using analysis of variance models with evaluating physician and photographs as main effects and interaction effect variables to account for the difference in scoring among dermatologists. Results: Correlations (73% to >90%) between dermatologists were all statistically significant (P<.001). Scores showed good to substantial agreement but were significantly different (P<.001) for each of 4 clinical signs and the difference varied significantly (P<.001) among photographs. Conclusions: With good to substantial agreement, we found the development of a photographic forearm sun damage assessment scale highly feasible. In view of significantly different rating scores, a photographic reference for assessment of sun damage is also necessary.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=78751562900&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=78751562900&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1001/archdermatol.2010.392

DO - 10.1001/archdermatol.2010.392

M3 - Article

VL - 147

SP - 31

EP - 36

JO - JAMA Dermatology

JF - JAMA Dermatology

SN - 2168-6068

IS - 1

ER -