Devices and desires

A complicated narrative of mobile writing and device-driven ecologies

Aimee C. Mapes, Amy C Kimme-Hea

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

Device. In its archaic sense, device signals an ultimate distrust. After all, devices are often associated with impulsive decisions, and those impulsive decisions might just be our undoing. As we covet new technologies and see them as the mediums by which we write, tweet, like, share, and thread, the devices themselves are manifestations and articulations of our desires. This dual articulation of devices as both being and becoming alludes to the conditions of ubiquity, suspicion, and celebration. As colleagues who study composing-and the ways it constructs and is constructed by cultural phenomenon of technology-we are tentative to assume that we can ever fully understand literate practices and issues of power, but we are committed, nonetheless, to advocating for a more complex exploration of mobility and writing in this time of the smartphone as the device par excellence. In this way, through our five-year longitudinal study of student writers at the University of Arizona and research on youth smartphone practices, we have come to understand students’ relationships to their smartphones, not just as productive tools, but as material and metaphorical articulations of their relationships, identities, and literate praxes. In rhetoric and composition, we might be well-served as teachers and scholars to understand the smartphone both as a part of student device-driven ecologies that allow literate activities and as a device that stands for who they are, and who they are becoming, in the world. In this way, smartphones are not merely separate pieces of equipment, but rather appendages to the body and conduits for intensity and even transformation. Embodied and networked, mobile devices are about becomings within competing relations. Giles Deleuze and Félix Guattari frame desire as continuous flows that are always becoming, and, according to Michalinos Zymbulas, form a productive desire (336). For literacy, this means situating texts, mediums, devices within a broader ecology of “signs, objects, and bodies,” a phenomenon Kevin Leander and Gail Boldt described as “literacy unbounded” (36). As productive desire, mobile literacies manifest capacious social practices that instigate pleasure and displeasure simultaneously.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationThe Routledge Handbook of Digital Writing and Rhetoric
PublisherTaylor and Francis
Pages73-83
Number of pages11
ISBN (Electronic)9781315518480
ISBN (Print)9781138671362
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2018

Fingerprint

Smartphones
Ecology
ecology
narrative
literacy
Students
student
new technology
longitudinal study
rhetoric
writer
Mobile devices
teacher
Chemical analysis

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Arts and Humanities(all)
  • Social Sciences(all)
  • Computer Science(all)

Cite this

Mapes, A. C., & Kimme-Hea, A. C. (2018). Devices and desires: A complicated narrative of mobile writing and device-driven ecologies. In The Routledge Handbook of Digital Writing and Rhetoric (pp. 73-83). Taylor and Francis. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315518497

Devices and desires : A complicated narrative of mobile writing and device-driven ecologies. / Mapes, Aimee C.; Kimme-Hea, Amy C.

The Routledge Handbook of Digital Writing and Rhetoric. Taylor and Francis, 2018. p. 73-83.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Mapes, AC & Kimme-Hea, AC 2018, Devices and desires: A complicated narrative of mobile writing and device-driven ecologies. in The Routledge Handbook of Digital Writing and Rhetoric. Taylor and Francis, pp. 73-83. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315518497
Mapes AC, Kimme-Hea AC. Devices and desires: A complicated narrative of mobile writing and device-driven ecologies. In The Routledge Handbook of Digital Writing and Rhetoric. Taylor and Francis. 2018. p. 73-83 https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315518497
Mapes, Aimee C. ; Kimme-Hea, Amy C. / Devices and desires : A complicated narrative of mobile writing and device-driven ecologies. The Routledge Handbook of Digital Writing and Rhetoric. Taylor and Francis, 2018. pp. 73-83
@inbook{843349dd6b77487db0feed86f5df612f,
title = "Devices and desires: A complicated narrative of mobile writing and device-driven ecologies",
abstract = "Device. In its archaic sense, device signals an ultimate distrust. After all, devices are often associated with impulsive decisions, and those impulsive decisions might just be our undoing. As we covet new technologies and see them as the mediums by which we write, tweet, like, share, and thread, the devices themselves are manifestations and articulations of our desires. This dual articulation of devices as both being and becoming alludes to the conditions of ubiquity, suspicion, and celebration. As colleagues who study composing-and the ways it constructs and is constructed by cultural phenomenon of technology-we are tentative to assume that we can ever fully understand literate practices and issues of power, but we are committed, nonetheless, to advocating for a more complex exploration of mobility and writing in this time of the smartphone as the device par excellence. In this way, through our five-year longitudinal study of student writers at the University of Arizona and research on youth smartphone practices, we have come to understand students’ relationships to their smartphones, not just as productive tools, but as material and metaphorical articulations of their relationships, identities, and literate praxes. In rhetoric and composition, we might be well-served as teachers and scholars to understand the smartphone both as a part of student device-driven ecologies that allow literate activities and as a device that stands for who they are, and who they are becoming, in the world. In this way, smartphones are not merely separate pieces of equipment, but rather appendages to the body and conduits for intensity and even transformation. Embodied and networked, mobile devices are about becomings within competing relations. Giles Deleuze and F{\'e}lix Guattari frame desire as continuous flows that are always becoming, and, according to Michalinos Zymbulas, form a productive desire (336). For literacy, this means situating texts, mediums, devices within a broader ecology of “signs, objects, and bodies,” a phenomenon Kevin Leander and Gail Boldt described as “literacy unbounded” (36). As productive desire, mobile literacies manifest capacious social practices that instigate pleasure and displeasure simultaneously.",
author = "Mapes, {Aimee C.} and Kimme-Hea, {Amy C}",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.4324/9781315518497",
language = "English (US)",
isbn = "9781138671362",
pages = "73--83",
booktitle = "The Routledge Handbook of Digital Writing and Rhetoric",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - Devices and desires

T2 - A complicated narrative of mobile writing and device-driven ecologies

AU - Mapes, Aimee C.

AU - Kimme-Hea, Amy C

PY - 2018/1/1

Y1 - 2018/1/1

N2 - Device. In its archaic sense, device signals an ultimate distrust. After all, devices are often associated with impulsive decisions, and those impulsive decisions might just be our undoing. As we covet new technologies and see them as the mediums by which we write, tweet, like, share, and thread, the devices themselves are manifestations and articulations of our desires. This dual articulation of devices as both being and becoming alludes to the conditions of ubiquity, suspicion, and celebration. As colleagues who study composing-and the ways it constructs and is constructed by cultural phenomenon of technology-we are tentative to assume that we can ever fully understand literate practices and issues of power, but we are committed, nonetheless, to advocating for a more complex exploration of mobility and writing in this time of the smartphone as the device par excellence. In this way, through our five-year longitudinal study of student writers at the University of Arizona and research on youth smartphone practices, we have come to understand students’ relationships to their smartphones, not just as productive tools, but as material and metaphorical articulations of their relationships, identities, and literate praxes. In rhetoric and composition, we might be well-served as teachers and scholars to understand the smartphone both as a part of student device-driven ecologies that allow literate activities and as a device that stands for who they are, and who they are becoming, in the world. In this way, smartphones are not merely separate pieces of equipment, but rather appendages to the body and conduits for intensity and even transformation. Embodied and networked, mobile devices are about becomings within competing relations. Giles Deleuze and Félix Guattari frame desire as continuous flows that are always becoming, and, according to Michalinos Zymbulas, form a productive desire (336). For literacy, this means situating texts, mediums, devices within a broader ecology of “signs, objects, and bodies,” a phenomenon Kevin Leander and Gail Boldt described as “literacy unbounded” (36). As productive desire, mobile literacies manifest capacious social practices that instigate pleasure and displeasure simultaneously.

AB - Device. In its archaic sense, device signals an ultimate distrust. After all, devices are often associated with impulsive decisions, and those impulsive decisions might just be our undoing. As we covet new technologies and see them as the mediums by which we write, tweet, like, share, and thread, the devices themselves are manifestations and articulations of our desires. This dual articulation of devices as both being and becoming alludes to the conditions of ubiquity, suspicion, and celebration. As colleagues who study composing-and the ways it constructs and is constructed by cultural phenomenon of technology-we are tentative to assume that we can ever fully understand literate practices and issues of power, but we are committed, nonetheless, to advocating for a more complex exploration of mobility and writing in this time of the smartphone as the device par excellence. In this way, through our five-year longitudinal study of student writers at the University of Arizona and research on youth smartphone practices, we have come to understand students’ relationships to their smartphones, not just as productive tools, but as material and metaphorical articulations of their relationships, identities, and literate praxes. In rhetoric and composition, we might be well-served as teachers and scholars to understand the smartphone both as a part of student device-driven ecologies that allow literate activities and as a device that stands for who they are, and who they are becoming, in the world. In this way, smartphones are not merely separate pieces of equipment, but rather appendages to the body and conduits for intensity and even transformation. Embodied and networked, mobile devices are about becomings within competing relations. Giles Deleuze and Félix Guattari frame desire as continuous flows that are always becoming, and, according to Michalinos Zymbulas, form a productive desire (336). For literacy, this means situating texts, mediums, devices within a broader ecology of “signs, objects, and bodies,” a phenomenon Kevin Leander and Gail Boldt described as “literacy unbounded” (36). As productive desire, mobile literacies manifest capacious social practices that instigate pleasure and displeasure simultaneously.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85049999894&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85049999894&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.4324/9781315518497

DO - 10.4324/9781315518497

M3 - Chapter

SN - 9781138671362

SP - 73

EP - 83

BT - The Routledge Handbook of Digital Writing and Rhetoric

PB - Taylor and Francis

ER -