Differential effects of unipolar versus bipolar depression on episodic memory updating

Bhaktee Dongaonkar, Almut Hupbach, Lynn Nadel, Sumantra Chattarji

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Episodic memories, when reactivated, can be modified or updated by new learning. Since such dynamic memory processes remain largely unexplored in psychiatric disorders, we examined the impact of depression on episodic memory updating. Unipolar and bipolar depression patients, and age/education matched controls, first learned a set of objects (List-1). Two days later, participants in all three groups were either reminded of the first learning session or not followed by the learning of a new set of objects (List-2). Forty-eight hours later, List-1 recall was impaired in unipolar and bipolar patients compared to control participants. Further, as expected, control participants who received a reminder spontaneously recalled items from List-2 during recall of List-1, indicative of an updated List-1 memory. Such spontaneous intrusions were also seen in the unipolar and bipolar patients that received the reminder, suggesting that memory updating was unaffected in these two patient groups despite impaired recall of List 1. Unexpectedly, we observed a trend towards higher intrusions, albeit statistically insignificant, not only in the reminder but also in the no-reminder subgroups of bipolar patients. We probed this further in a second cohort by testing recall of List-2, which was also impaired in both depression groups. Again bipolar patients showed intrusions, but this time in the reverse order from List-1 into List-2, independent of a reminder. Taken together, despite impaired recall, updating of episodic memories was intact and unidirectional in unipolar depression. In contrast, indiscriminate updating, as evidenced by bidirectional interference between episodic memories, was seen in bipolar depression. These findings reveal a novel distinction between unipolar versus bipolar depression using a reactivation-dependent memory updating paradigm.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)158-168
Number of pages11
JournalNeurobiology of Learning and Memory
Volume161
DOIs
StatePublished - May 1 2019

Fingerprint

Episodic Memory
Bipolar Disorder
Learning
Depressive Disorder
Depression
Patient Education
Psychiatry

Keywords

  • Bipolar depression
  • Delayed recall
  • Episodic memory updating
  • List learning
  • Memory reactivation
  • Unipolar depression

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Behavioral Neuroscience

Cite this

Differential effects of unipolar versus bipolar depression on episodic memory updating. / Dongaonkar, Bhaktee; Hupbach, Almut; Nadel, Lynn; Chattarji, Sumantra.

In: Neurobiology of Learning and Memory, Vol. 161, 01.05.2019, p. 158-168.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Dongaonkar, Bhaktee ; Hupbach, Almut ; Nadel, Lynn ; Chattarji, Sumantra. / Differential effects of unipolar versus bipolar depression on episodic memory updating. In: Neurobiology of Learning and Memory. 2019 ; Vol. 161. pp. 158-168.
@article{63963bb977434a3ab2a65044a0e0b67d,
title = "Differential effects of unipolar versus bipolar depression on episodic memory updating",
abstract = "Episodic memories, when reactivated, can be modified or updated by new learning. Since such dynamic memory processes remain largely unexplored in psychiatric disorders, we examined the impact of depression on episodic memory updating. Unipolar and bipolar depression patients, and age/education matched controls, first learned a set of objects (List-1). Two days later, participants in all three groups were either reminded of the first learning session or not followed by the learning of a new set of objects (List-2). Forty-eight hours later, List-1 recall was impaired in unipolar and bipolar patients compared to control participants. Further, as expected, control participants who received a reminder spontaneously recalled items from List-2 during recall of List-1, indicative of an updated List-1 memory. Such spontaneous intrusions were also seen in the unipolar and bipolar patients that received the reminder, suggesting that memory updating was unaffected in these two patient groups despite impaired recall of List 1. Unexpectedly, we observed a trend towards higher intrusions, albeit statistically insignificant, not only in the reminder but also in the no-reminder subgroups of bipolar patients. We probed this further in a second cohort by testing recall of List-2, which was also impaired in both depression groups. Again bipolar patients showed intrusions, but this time in the reverse order from List-1 into List-2, independent of a reminder. Taken together, despite impaired recall, updating of episodic memories was intact and unidirectional in unipolar depression. In contrast, indiscriminate updating, as evidenced by bidirectional interference between episodic memories, was seen in bipolar depression. These findings reveal a novel distinction between unipolar versus bipolar depression using a reactivation-dependent memory updating paradigm.",
keywords = "Bipolar depression, Delayed recall, Episodic memory updating, List learning, Memory reactivation, Unipolar depression",
author = "Bhaktee Dongaonkar and Almut Hupbach and Lynn Nadel and Sumantra Chattarji",
year = "2019",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.nlm.2019.04.008",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "161",
pages = "158--168",
journal = "Neurobiology of Learning and Memory",
issn = "1074-7427",
publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Differential effects of unipolar versus bipolar depression on episodic memory updating

AU - Dongaonkar, Bhaktee

AU - Hupbach, Almut

AU - Nadel, Lynn

AU - Chattarji, Sumantra

PY - 2019/5/1

Y1 - 2019/5/1

N2 - Episodic memories, when reactivated, can be modified or updated by new learning. Since such dynamic memory processes remain largely unexplored in psychiatric disorders, we examined the impact of depression on episodic memory updating. Unipolar and bipolar depression patients, and age/education matched controls, first learned a set of objects (List-1). Two days later, participants in all three groups were either reminded of the first learning session or not followed by the learning of a new set of objects (List-2). Forty-eight hours later, List-1 recall was impaired in unipolar and bipolar patients compared to control participants. Further, as expected, control participants who received a reminder spontaneously recalled items from List-2 during recall of List-1, indicative of an updated List-1 memory. Such spontaneous intrusions were also seen in the unipolar and bipolar patients that received the reminder, suggesting that memory updating was unaffected in these two patient groups despite impaired recall of List 1. Unexpectedly, we observed a trend towards higher intrusions, albeit statistically insignificant, not only in the reminder but also in the no-reminder subgroups of bipolar patients. We probed this further in a second cohort by testing recall of List-2, which was also impaired in both depression groups. Again bipolar patients showed intrusions, but this time in the reverse order from List-1 into List-2, independent of a reminder. Taken together, despite impaired recall, updating of episodic memories was intact and unidirectional in unipolar depression. In contrast, indiscriminate updating, as evidenced by bidirectional interference between episodic memories, was seen in bipolar depression. These findings reveal a novel distinction between unipolar versus bipolar depression using a reactivation-dependent memory updating paradigm.

AB - Episodic memories, when reactivated, can be modified or updated by new learning. Since such dynamic memory processes remain largely unexplored in psychiatric disorders, we examined the impact of depression on episodic memory updating. Unipolar and bipolar depression patients, and age/education matched controls, first learned a set of objects (List-1). Two days later, participants in all three groups were either reminded of the first learning session or not followed by the learning of a new set of objects (List-2). Forty-eight hours later, List-1 recall was impaired in unipolar and bipolar patients compared to control participants. Further, as expected, control participants who received a reminder spontaneously recalled items from List-2 during recall of List-1, indicative of an updated List-1 memory. Such spontaneous intrusions were also seen in the unipolar and bipolar patients that received the reminder, suggesting that memory updating was unaffected in these two patient groups despite impaired recall of List 1. Unexpectedly, we observed a trend towards higher intrusions, albeit statistically insignificant, not only in the reminder but also in the no-reminder subgroups of bipolar patients. We probed this further in a second cohort by testing recall of List-2, which was also impaired in both depression groups. Again bipolar patients showed intrusions, but this time in the reverse order from List-1 into List-2, independent of a reminder. Taken together, despite impaired recall, updating of episodic memories was intact and unidirectional in unipolar depression. In contrast, indiscriminate updating, as evidenced by bidirectional interference between episodic memories, was seen in bipolar depression. These findings reveal a novel distinction between unipolar versus bipolar depression using a reactivation-dependent memory updating paradigm.

KW - Bipolar depression

KW - Delayed recall

KW - Episodic memory updating

KW - List learning

KW - Memory reactivation

KW - Unipolar depression

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85064451438&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85064451438&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.nlm.2019.04.008

DO - 10.1016/j.nlm.2019.04.008

M3 - Article

C2 - 31004802

AN - SCOPUS:85064451438

VL - 161

SP - 158

EP - 168

JO - Neurobiology of Learning and Memory

JF - Neurobiology of Learning and Memory

SN - 1074-7427

ER -