Differential use of image enhancement techniques by experienced and inexperienced observers

Elizabeth A Krupinski, Hans Roehrig, William Dallas, Jiahua Fan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

15 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Full-field digital mammography (FFDM) systems are currently being used to acquire mammograms in digital format, but digital displays are less than ideal compared to traditional film-screen display. Certain physical properties of softcopy displays [e.g., modulation transfer function (MTF)] are less than optimal compared to film. We developed methods to compensate for some of these softcopy display deficiencies, based on careful physical characterization of the displays and image-processing software. A series of 100 FFDM and 60 digitized images was shown to six observers-half experienced (mammographers) and half inexperienced (radiology residents). The observers had to decide if a mass or microcalcification cluster was present and classify it as benign or malignant. A window could be activated that brought the image detail within the window to full resolution and corrected for the nonisotropic MTF of the Cathode Ray Tube (CRT) display. Experienced readers had better diagnostic performance and took less time to view the images. Experienced readers used window/level more than inexperienced readers, but inexperienced readers used magnification and the MTF compensation tool more often. Use of the magnification and the MTF tool increased reader decision confidence. Experienced and inexperienced readers use image-processing tools differently, with certain tools increasing reader confidence. Understanding how observers use image-processing tools may help in the development of better and more automated user interfaces.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)311-315
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Digital Imaging
Volume18
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2005

Fingerprint

Image Enhancement
Image enhancement
Mammography
Cathode Ray Tube
Display devices
Optical transfer function
Calcinosis
Motion Pictures
Radiology
Image processing
Software
Cathode ray tubes
User interfaces
Physical properties

Keywords

  • Mammography
  • Observer performance
  • Optimization
  • Softcopy display

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

Cite this

Differential use of image enhancement techniques by experienced and inexperienced observers. / Krupinski, Elizabeth A; Roehrig, Hans; Dallas, William; Fan, Jiahua.

In: Journal of Digital Imaging, Vol. 18, No. 4, 12.2005, p. 311-315.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Krupinski, Elizabeth A ; Roehrig, Hans ; Dallas, William ; Fan, Jiahua. / Differential use of image enhancement techniques by experienced and inexperienced observers. In: Journal of Digital Imaging. 2005 ; Vol. 18, No. 4. pp. 311-315.
@article{300195623b144eeebf964d8928f1eb50,
title = "Differential use of image enhancement techniques by experienced and inexperienced observers",
abstract = "Full-field digital mammography (FFDM) systems are currently being used to acquire mammograms in digital format, but digital displays are less than ideal compared to traditional film-screen display. Certain physical properties of softcopy displays [e.g., modulation transfer function (MTF)] are less than optimal compared to film. We developed methods to compensate for some of these softcopy display deficiencies, based on careful physical characterization of the displays and image-processing software. A series of 100 FFDM and 60 digitized images was shown to six observers-half experienced (mammographers) and half inexperienced (radiology residents). The observers had to decide if a mass or microcalcification cluster was present and classify it as benign or malignant. A window could be activated that brought the image detail within the window to full resolution and corrected for the nonisotropic MTF of the Cathode Ray Tube (CRT) display. Experienced readers had better diagnostic performance and took less time to view the images. Experienced readers used window/level more than inexperienced readers, but inexperienced readers used magnification and the MTF compensation tool more often. Use of the magnification and the MTF tool increased reader decision confidence. Experienced and inexperienced readers use image-processing tools differently, with certain tools increasing reader confidence. Understanding how observers use image-processing tools may help in the development of better and more automated user interfaces.",
keywords = "Mammography, Observer performance, Optimization, Softcopy display",
author = "Krupinski, {Elizabeth A} and Hans Roehrig and William Dallas and Jiahua Fan",
year = "2005",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1007/s10278-005-7666-z",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "18",
pages = "311--315",
journal = "Journal of Digital Imaging",
issn = "0897-1889",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Differential use of image enhancement techniques by experienced and inexperienced observers

AU - Krupinski, Elizabeth A

AU - Roehrig, Hans

AU - Dallas, William

AU - Fan, Jiahua

PY - 2005/12

Y1 - 2005/12

N2 - Full-field digital mammography (FFDM) systems are currently being used to acquire mammograms in digital format, but digital displays are less than ideal compared to traditional film-screen display. Certain physical properties of softcopy displays [e.g., modulation transfer function (MTF)] are less than optimal compared to film. We developed methods to compensate for some of these softcopy display deficiencies, based on careful physical characterization of the displays and image-processing software. A series of 100 FFDM and 60 digitized images was shown to six observers-half experienced (mammographers) and half inexperienced (radiology residents). The observers had to decide if a mass or microcalcification cluster was present and classify it as benign or malignant. A window could be activated that brought the image detail within the window to full resolution and corrected for the nonisotropic MTF of the Cathode Ray Tube (CRT) display. Experienced readers had better diagnostic performance and took less time to view the images. Experienced readers used window/level more than inexperienced readers, but inexperienced readers used magnification and the MTF compensation tool more often. Use of the magnification and the MTF tool increased reader decision confidence. Experienced and inexperienced readers use image-processing tools differently, with certain tools increasing reader confidence. Understanding how observers use image-processing tools may help in the development of better and more automated user interfaces.

AB - Full-field digital mammography (FFDM) systems are currently being used to acquire mammograms in digital format, but digital displays are less than ideal compared to traditional film-screen display. Certain physical properties of softcopy displays [e.g., modulation transfer function (MTF)] are less than optimal compared to film. We developed methods to compensate for some of these softcopy display deficiencies, based on careful physical characterization of the displays and image-processing software. A series of 100 FFDM and 60 digitized images was shown to six observers-half experienced (mammographers) and half inexperienced (radiology residents). The observers had to decide if a mass or microcalcification cluster was present and classify it as benign or malignant. A window could be activated that brought the image detail within the window to full resolution and corrected for the nonisotropic MTF of the Cathode Ray Tube (CRT) display. Experienced readers had better diagnostic performance and took less time to view the images. Experienced readers used window/level more than inexperienced readers, but inexperienced readers used magnification and the MTF compensation tool more often. Use of the magnification and the MTF tool increased reader decision confidence. Experienced and inexperienced readers use image-processing tools differently, with certain tools increasing reader confidence. Understanding how observers use image-processing tools may help in the development of better and more automated user interfaces.

KW - Mammography

KW - Observer performance

KW - Optimization

KW - Softcopy display

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=27744524909&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=27744524909&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s10278-005-7666-z

DO - 10.1007/s10278-005-7666-z

M3 - Article

VL - 18

SP - 311

EP - 315

JO - Journal of Digital Imaging

JF - Journal of Digital Imaging

SN - 0897-1889

IS - 4

ER -