Dimensions Of Communication Reticence And Their Impact On Verbal Encoding

Judee K Burgoon, Jerold L. Hale

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

17 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This investigation examined the relationship between predispositions toward communication reticence and five verbal encoding behaviors: productivity, lexical diversity, complexity, comprehensibility, and language intensity. Dimensions of the Personal Report of Communication Apprehension, the Unwillingness-to-Communication Scale, and the Writing Apprehension Test were all found to predict facets of language use among 83 students who anonymously wrote essays and filled in the blanks on prepared messages. Individuals who had high apprehension toward and/or negative evaluation of oral communication contexts displayed less intense language, greater productivity, more varied vocabulary, more complex language, and less comprehensible verbalizations. Conversely, individuals with high apprehension toward and/or negative evaluations of written communication activities used more redundant language, simpler vocabulary, more intense language, and more comprehensible verbalizations. Results are discussed in terms of the distinctions that can be made among the conventional communication reticence constructs and the ability of impairment, facilitation, and choice explanations to account for the effects.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)302-312
Number of pages11
JournalCommunication Quarterly
Volume31
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - 1983

Fingerprint

communication
Communication
language
vocabulary
Productivity
productivity
language behavior
evaluation
Students
ability
student

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Communication

Cite this

Dimensions Of Communication Reticence And Their Impact On Verbal Encoding. / Burgoon, Judee K; Hale, Jerold L.

In: Communication Quarterly, Vol. 31, No. 4, 1983, p. 302-312.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{7ec0514eb07c4a0d9cbeb9d2387279ce,
title = "Dimensions Of Communication Reticence And Their Impact On Verbal Encoding",
abstract = "This investigation examined the relationship between predispositions toward communication reticence and five verbal encoding behaviors: productivity, lexical diversity, complexity, comprehensibility, and language intensity. Dimensions of the Personal Report of Communication Apprehension, the Unwillingness-to-Communication Scale, and the Writing Apprehension Test were all found to predict facets of language use among 83 students who anonymously wrote essays and filled in the blanks on prepared messages. Individuals who had high apprehension toward and/or negative evaluation of oral communication contexts displayed less intense language, greater productivity, more varied vocabulary, more complex language, and less comprehensible verbalizations. Conversely, individuals with high apprehension toward and/or negative evaluations of written communication activities used more redundant language, simpler vocabulary, more intense language, and more comprehensible verbalizations. Results are discussed in terms of the distinctions that can be made among the conventional communication reticence constructs and the ability of impairment, facilitation, and choice explanations to account for the effects.",
author = "Burgoon, {Judee K} and Hale, {Jerold L.}",
year = "1983",
doi = "10.1080/01463378309369519",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "31",
pages = "302--312",
journal = "Communication Quarterly",
issn = "0146-3373",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Dimensions Of Communication Reticence And Their Impact On Verbal Encoding

AU - Burgoon, Judee K

AU - Hale, Jerold L.

PY - 1983

Y1 - 1983

N2 - This investigation examined the relationship between predispositions toward communication reticence and five verbal encoding behaviors: productivity, lexical diversity, complexity, comprehensibility, and language intensity. Dimensions of the Personal Report of Communication Apprehension, the Unwillingness-to-Communication Scale, and the Writing Apprehension Test were all found to predict facets of language use among 83 students who anonymously wrote essays and filled in the blanks on prepared messages. Individuals who had high apprehension toward and/or negative evaluation of oral communication contexts displayed less intense language, greater productivity, more varied vocabulary, more complex language, and less comprehensible verbalizations. Conversely, individuals with high apprehension toward and/or negative evaluations of written communication activities used more redundant language, simpler vocabulary, more intense language, and more comprehensible verbalizations. Results are discussed in terms of the distinctions that can be made among the conventional communication reticence constructs and the ability of impairment, facilitation, and choice explanations to account for the effects.

AB - This investigation examined the relationship between predispositions toward communication reticence and five verbal encoding behaviors: productivity, lexical diversity, complexity, comprehensibility, and language intensity. Dimensions of the Personal Report of Communication Apprehension, the Unwillingness-to-Communication Scale, and the Writing Apprehension Test were all found to predict facets of language use among 83 students who anonymously wrote essays and filled in the blanks on prepared messages. Individuals who had high apprehension toward and/or negative evaluation of oral communication contexts displayed less intense language, greater productivity, more varied vocabulary, more complex language, and less comprehensible verbalizations. Conversely, individuals with high apprehension toward and/or negative evaluations of written communication activities used more redundant language, simpler vocabulary, more intense language, and more comprehensible verbalizations. Results are discussed in terms of the distinctions that can be made among the conventional communication reticence constructs and the ability of impairment, facilitation, and choice explanations to account for the effects.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84926270113&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84926270113&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/01463378309369519

DO - 10.1080/01463378309369519

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84926270113

VL - 31

SP - 302

EP - 312

JO - Communication Quarterly

JF - Communication Quarterly

SN - 0146-3373

IS - 4

ER -