Disciplining the Discipline: Anthropology and the Pursuit of Quality Education

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

36 Scopus citations

Abstract

Disciplinary knowledge in anthropology occupies a unique position in relation to quality education: anthropology in education and the anthropology of education. This essay differentiates between anthropology as a field, as a repository of content and disciplinary knowledge (anthropology in education), and anthropology as a tool, as a theoretical and heuristic device that allows us to study students, schooling, learning, and teaching (the anthropology of education). Drawing on Bakhtin’s formulation of centrifugal and centripetal forces, the author argues that anthropology has both enabled and limited possibilities for quality education. A retrospective look at the construct of culture is emblematic of this process. The author claims that the disciplining of anthropological boundaries has often resulted in disengagement of anthropology as a field from issues of practice. Furthermore, the argument is made that an engaged anthropology must confront the implications of its theories, especially as they are applied in the crucible of education and schools.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)17-25
Number of pages9
JournalEducational Researcher
Volume33
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2004

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Disciplining the Discipline: Anthropology and the Pursuit of Quality Education'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this