Discriminating between right coronary artery and circumflex artery occlusion by using a noninvasive 18-lead electrocardiogram

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background Differentiating occlusion of the circumflex branch of the left coronary artery (also called the circumflex artery) from occlusion of the right coronary artery is often difficult because either may be associated with a pattern of acute inferior myocardial infarction on the electrocardiogram. Objectives To determine if an inexpensive 18-lead electrocardiogram can provide useful information in differentiating sites of coronary occlusion. Methods Continuous 18-lead electrocardiograms, including standard 12-lead, right ventricular, and posterior leads, were recorded in 38 and 50 subjects undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions in the right coronary artery and the circumflex artery, respectively. RESULTS ST-segment elevation in the posterior leads was twice as frequent during occlusion of the circumflex artery as during right coronary occlusion (P<.001). ST-segment elevation in the right ventricular leads and inferior leads occurred more often during occlusion of the right coronary artery than during occlusion of the circumflex artery. ST-segment depression in lead aVL is highly suggestive of right coronary occlusion, whereas ST-segment elevation in posterior leads without depression of the ST segment in lead aVL is highly sensitive and specific for occlusion of the circumflex artery. Conclusions ST-segment changes in the 18-lead electrocardiogram can be used to differentiate between occlusions of the circumflex artery and occlusions of the right coronary artery. Knowing which vessel is occluded before percutaneous coronary intervention can help in planning the procedure and recognizing when patients are at high risk for disturbances in conduction at the atrioventricular node.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)63-71
Number of pages9
JournalAmerican Journal of Critical Care
Volume16
Issue number1
StatePublished - 2007

Fingerprint

Coronary Vessels
Electrocardiography
Arteries
Coronary Occlusion
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
Inferior Wall Myocardial Infarction
Atrioventricular Node
Lead

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Critical Care
  • Medicine(all)
  • Nursing(all)

Cite this

@article{2dba9a3c7d4f4b26b6587797b2b9c6aa,
title = "Discriminating between right coronary artery and circumflex artery occlusion by using a noninvasive 18-lead electrocardiogram",
abstract = "Background Differentiating occlusion of the circumflex branch of the left coronary artery (also called the circumflex artery) from occlusion of the right coronary artery is often difficult because either may be associated with a pattern of acute inferior myocardial infarction on the electrocardiogram. Objectives To determine if an inexpensive 18-lead electrocardiogram can provide useful information in differentiating sites of coronary occlusion. Methods Continuous 18-lead electrocardiograms, including standard 12-lead, right ventricular, and posterior leads, were recorded in 38 and 50 subjects undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions in the right coronary artery and the circumflex artery, respectively. RESULTS ST-segment elevation in the posterior leads was twice as frequent during occlusion of the circumflex artery as during right coronary occlusion (P<.001). ST-segment elevation in the right ventricular leads and inferior leads occurred more often during occlusion of the right coronary artery than during occlusion of the circumflex artery. ST-segment depression in lead aVL is highly suggestive of right coronary occlusion, whereas ST-segment elevation in posterior leads without depression of the ST segment in lead aVL is highly sensitive and specific for occlusion of the circumflex artery. Conclusions ST-segment changes in the 18-lead electrocardiogram can be used to differentiate between occlusions of the circumflex artery and occlusions of the right coronary artery. Knowing which vessel is occluded before percutaneous coronary intervention can help in planning the procedure and recognizing when patients are at high risk for disturbances in conduction at the atrioventricular node.",
author = "Shu-Fen Wung",
year = "2007",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "16",
pages = "63--71",
journal = "American Journal of Critical Care",
issn = "1062-3264",
publisher = "American Association of Critical Care Nurses",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Discriminating between right coronary artery and circumflex artery occlusion by using a noninvasive 18-lead electrocardiogram

AU - Wung, Shu-Fen

PY - 2007

Y1 - 2007

N2 - Background Differentiating occlusion of the circumflex branch of the left coronary artery (also called the circumflex artery) from occlusion of the right coronary artery is often difficult because either may be associated with a pattern of acute inferior myocardial infarction on the electrocardiogram. Objectives To determine if an inexpensive 18-lead electrocardiogram can provide useful information in differentiating sites of coronary occlusion. Methods Continuous 18-lead electrocardiograms, including standard 12-lead, right ventricular, and posterior leads, were recorded in 38 and 50 subjects undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions in the right coronary artery and the circumflex artery, respectively. RESULTS ST-segment elevation in the posterior leads was twice as frequent during occlusion of the circumflex artery as during right coronary occlusion (P<.001). ST-segment elevation in the right ventricular leads and inferior leads occurred more often during occlusion of the right coronary artery than during occlusion of the circumflex artery. ST-segment depression in lead aVL is highly suggestive of right coronary occlusion, whereas ST-segment elevation in posterior leads without depression of the ST segment in lead aVL is highly sensitive and specific for occlusion of the circumflex artery. Conclusions ST-segment changes in the 18-lead electrocardiogram can be used to differentiate between occlusions of the circumflex artery and occlusions of the right coronary artery. Knowing which vessel is occluded before percutaneous coronary intervention can help in planning the procedure and recognizing when patients are at high risk for disturbances in conduction at the atrioventricular node.

AB - Background Differentiating occlusion of the circumflex branch of the left coronary artery (also called the circumflex artery) from occlusion of the right coronary artery is often difficult because either may be associated with a pattern of acute inferior myocardial infarction on the electrocardiogram. Objectives To determine if an inexpensive 18-lead electrocardiogram can provide useful information in differentiating sites of coronary occlusion. Methods Continuous 18-lead electrocardiograms, including standard 12-lead, right ventricular, and posterior leads, were recorded in 38 and 50 subjects undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions in the right coronary artery and the circumflex artery, respectively. RESULTS ST-segment elevation in the posterior leads was twice as frequent during occlusion of the circumflex artery as during right coronary occlusion (P<.001). ST-segment elevation in the right ventricular leads and inferior leads occurred more often during occlusion of the right coronary artery than during occlusion of the circumflex artery. ST-segment depression in lead aVL is highly suggestive of right coronary occlusion, whereas ST-segment elevation in posterior leads without depression of the ST segment in lead aVL is highly sensitive and specific for occlusion of the circumflex artery. Conclusions ST-segment changes in the 18-lead electrocardiogram can be used to differentiate between occlusions of the circumflex artery and occlusions of the right coronary artery. Knowing which vessel is occluded before percutaneous coronary intervention can help in planning the procedure and recognizing when patients are at high risk for disturbances in conduction at the atrioventricular node.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=36049052187&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=36049052187&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 17192527

AN - SCOPUS:36049052187

VL - 16

SP - 63

EP - 71

JO - American Journal of Critical Care

JF - American Journal of Critical Care

SN - 1062-3264

IS - 1

ER -