Dispositional and Situational Avoidance and Approach as Predictors of Physical Symptom Bother Following Breast Cancer Diagnosis

Margaret R. Bauer, Lauren N. Harris, Joshua F. Wiley, Catherine M. Crespi, Jennifer L. Krull, Karen L Weihs, Annette L. Stanton

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Few studies examine whether dispositional approach and avoidance coping and stressor-specific coping strategies differentially predict physical adjustment to cancer-related stress. Purpose: This study examines dispositional and situational avoidance and approach coping as unique predictors of the bother women experience from physical symptoms after breast cancer treatment, as well as whether situational coping mediates the prediction of bother from physical symptoms by dispositional coping. Method: Breast cancer patients (N = 460) diagnosed within the past 3 months completed self-report measures of dispositional coping at study entry and of situational coping and bother from physical symptoms every 6 weeks through 6 months. Results: In multilevel structural equation modeling analyses, both dispositional and situational avoidance predict greater symptom bother. Dispositional, but not situational, approach predicts less symptom bother. Supporting mediation models, dispositional avoidance predicts more symptom bother indirectly through greater situational avoidance. Dispositional approach predicts less symptom bother through less situational avoidance. Conclusion: Psychosocial interventions to reduce cancer-related avoidance coping are warranted for cancer survivors who are high in dispositional avoidance and/or low in dispositional approach.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1-15
Number of pages15
JournalAnnals of Behavioral Medicine
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Jan 14 2016

Fingerprint

Breast Neoplasms
Neoplasms
Self Report
Survivors
Therapeutics

Keywords

  • Approach
  • Avoidance
  • Breast cancer
  • Coping
  • Physical symptoms

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychology(all)
  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Cite this

Dispositional and Situational Avoidance and Approach as Predictors of Physical Symptom Bother Following Breast Cancer Diagnosis. / Bauer, Margaret R.; Harris, Lauren N.; Wiley, Joshua F.; Crespi, Catherine M.; Krull, Jennifer L.; Weihs, Karen L; Stanton, Annette L.

In: Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 14.01.2016, p. 1-15.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Bauer, Margaret R. ; Harris, Lauren N. ; Wiley, Joshua F. ; Crespi, Catherine M. ; Krull, Jennifer L. ; Weihs, Karen L ; Stanton, Annette L. / Dispositional and Situational Avoidance and Approach as Predictors of Physical Symptom Bother Following Breast Cancer Diagnosis. In: Annals of Behavioral Medicine. 2016 ; pp. 1-15.
@article{919fd59181354ff4bcef8f058085e370,
title = "Dispositional and Situational Avoidance and Approach as Predictors of Physical Symptom Bother Following Breast Cancer Diagnosis",
abstract = "Background: Few studies examine whether dispositional approach and avoidance coping and stressor-specific coping strategies differentially predict physical adjustment to cancer-related stress. Purpose: This study examines dispositional and situational avoidance and approach coping as unique predictors of the bother women experience from physical symptoms after breast cancer treatment, as well as whether situational coping mediates the prediction of bother from physical symptoms by dispositional coping. Method: Breast cancer patients (N = 460) diagnosed within the past 3 months completed self-report measures of dispositional coping at study entry and of situational coping and bother from physical symptoms every 6 weeks through 6 months. Results: In multilevel structural equation modeling analyses, both dispositional and situational avoidance predict greater symptom bother. Dispositional, but not situational, approach predicts less symptom bother. Supporting mediation models, dispositional avoidance predicts more symptom bother indirectly through greater situational avoidance. Dispositional approach predicts less symptom bother through less situational avoidance. Conclusion: Psychosocial interventions to reduce cancer-related avoidance coping are warranted for cancer survivors who are high in dispositional avoidance and/or low in dispositional approach.",
keywords = "Approach, Avoidance, Breast cancer, Coping, Physical symptoms",
author = "Bauer, {Margaret R.} and Harris, {Lauren N.} and Wiley, {Joshua F.} and Crespi, {Catherine M.} and Krull, {Jennifer L.} and Weihs, {Karen L} and Stanton, {Annette L.}",
year = "2016",
month = "1",
day = "14",
doi = "10.1007/s12160-015-9763-7",
language = "English (US)",
pages = "1--15",
journal = "Annals of Behavioral Medicine",
issn = "0883-6612",
publisher = "Springer New York",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Dispositional and Situational Avoidance and Approach as Predictors of Physical Symptom Bother Following Breast Cancer Diagnosis

AU - Bauer, Margaret R.

AU - Harris, Lauren N.

AU - Wiley, Joshua F.

AU - Crespi, Catherine M.

AU - Krull, Jennifer L.

AU - Weihs, Karen L

AU - Stanton, Annette L.

PY - 2016/1/14

Y1 - 2016/1/14

N2 - Background: Few studies examine whether dispositional approach and avoidance coping and stressor-specific coping strategies differentially predict physical adjustment to cancer-related stress. Purpose: This study examines dispositional and situational avoidance and approach coping as unique predictors of the bother women experience from physical symptoms after breast cancer treatment, as well as whether situational coping mediates the prediction of bother from physical symptoms by dispositional coping. Method: Breast cancer patients (N = 460) diagnosed within the past 3 months completed self-report measures of dispositional coping at study entry and of situational coping and bother from physical symptoms every 6 weeks through 6 months. Results: In multilevel structural equation modeling analyses, both dispositional and situational avoidance predict greater symptom bother. Dispositional, but not situational, approach predicts less symptom bother. Supporting mediation models, dispositional avoidance predicts more symptom bother indirectly through greater situational avoidance. Dispositional approach predicts less symptom bother through less situational avoidance. Conclusion: Psychosocial interventions to reduce cancer-related avoidance coping are warranted for cancer survivors who are high in dispositional avoidance and/or low in dispositional approach.

AB - Background: Few studies examine whether dispositional approach and avoidance coping and stressor-specific coping strategies differentially predict physical adjustment to cancer-related stress. Purpose: This study examines dispositional and situational avoidance and approach coping as unique predictors of the bother women experience from physical symptoms after breast cancer treatment, as well as whether situational coping mediates the prediction of bother from physical symptoms by dispositional coping. Method: Breast cancer patients (N = 460) diagnosed within the past 3 months completed self-report measures of dispositional coping at study entry and of situational coping and bother from physical symptoms every 6 weeks through 6 months. Results: In multilevel structural equation modeling analyses, both dispositional and situational avoidance predict greater symptom bother. Dispositional, but not situational, approach predicts less symptom bother. Supporting mediation models, dispositional avoidance predicts more symptom bother indirectly through greater situational avoidance. Dispositional approach predicts less symptom bother through less situational avoidance. Conclusion: Psychosocial interventions to reduce cancer-related avoidance coping are warranted for cancer survivors who are high in dispositional avoidance and/or low in dispositional approach.

KW - Approach

KW - Avoidance

KW - Breast cancer

KW - Coping

KW - Physical symptoms

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84954315249&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84954315249&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s12160-015-9763-7

DO - 10.1007/s12160-015-9763-7

M3 - Article

SP - 1

EP - 15

JO - Annals of Behavioral Medicine

JF - Annals of Behavioral Medicine

SN - 0883-6612

ER -