Distance-responsive predation is not necessary for the Janzen-Connell hypothesis

Simon Maccracken Stump, Peter Chesson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

17 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The Janzen-Connell hypothesis states that tree diversity in tropical forests is maintained by specialist predators that are distance- or density-responsive (i.e. predators that reduce seed or seedling survival near adults of their hosts). Many empirical studies have investigated whether predators are distance-responsive; however, few studies have examined whether distance-responsiveness matters for how predators maintain tree diversity. Using a site-occupancy model, we show analytically that distance-responsive predators are actually less able to maintain diversity than specialist predators that are not distance-responsive. Generally, specialist predators maintain diversity because they become rare when their host's densities are low, reducing predation risk. However, if predators are distance-responsive, and most seeds cannot disperse away from these predators, then seed predation rates will remain high, even if predator density is low across the landscape. Consequently, a reduction in a host's population density may not lead to a significant reduction in seed and seedling predation. We show that habitat partitioning can cause recruitment to be highest near conspecific adults, even in the presence of distance-responsive predators, without any change in the effect that the predators have on coexistence (a result contrary to predictions of the Janzen-Connell hypothesis). Rather, specialist predators and habitat partitioning have additive effects on species coexistence in our model, i.e., neither mechanism alters the effect of the other one.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)60-70
Number of pages11
JournalTheoretical Population Biology
Volume106
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2015

Fingerprint

predation
predator
predators
seed
coexistence
partitioning
seeds
seedling
seed predation
seedlings
habitat
predation risk
habitats
additive effect
tropical forests
tropical forest
population density
prediction

Keywords

  • Coexistence
  • Fitness-density covariance
  • Habitat partitioning
  • Janzen-Connell hypothesis
  • Predator partitioning
  • Spatial storage effect

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

Cite this

Distance-responsive predation is not necessary for the Janzen-Connell hypothesis. / Stump, Simon Maccracken; Chesson, Peter.

In: Theoretical Population Biology, Vol. 106, 01.12.2015, p. 60-70.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{159a8d54780640599af603aadab4cc8c,
title = "Distance-responsive predation is not necessary for the Janzen-Connell hypothesis",
abstract = "The Janzen-Connell hypothesis states that tree diversity in tropical forests is maintained by specialist predators that are distance- or density-responsive (i.e. predators that reduce seed or seedling survival near adults of their hosts). Many empirical studies have investigated whether predators are distance-responsive; however, few studies have examined whether distance-responsiveness matters for how predators maintain tree diversity. Using a site-occupancy model, we show analytically that distance-responsive predators are actually less able to maintain diversity than specialist predators that are not distance-responsive. Generally, specialist predators maintain diversity because they become rare when their host's densities are low, reducing predation risk. However, if predators are distance-responsive, and most seeds cannot disperse away from these predators, then seed predation rates will remain high, even if predator density is low across the landscape. Consequently, a reduction in a host's population density may not lead to a significant reduction in seed and seedling predation. We show that habitat partitioning can cause recruitment to be highest near conspecific adults, even in the presence of distance-responsive predators, without any change in the effect that the predators have on coexistence (a result contrary to predictions of the Janzen-Connell hypothesis). Rather, specialist predators and habitat partitioning have additive effects on species coexistence in our model, i.e., neither mechanism alters the effect of the other one.",
keywords = "Coexistence, Fitness-density covariance, Habitat partitioning, Janzen-Connell hypothesis, Predator partitioning, Spatial storage effect",
author = "Stump, {Simon Maccracken} and Peter Chesson",
year = "2015",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.tpb.2015.10.006",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "106",
pages = "60--70",
journal = "Theoretical Population Biology",
issn = "0040-5809",
publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Distance-responsive predation is not necessary for the Janzen-Connell hypothesis

AU - Stump, Simon Maccracken

AU - Chesson, Peter

PY - 2015/12/1

Y1 - 2015/12/1

N2 - The Janzen-Connell hypothesis states that tree diversity in tropical forests is maintained by specialist predators that are distance- or density-responsive (i.e. predators that reduce seed or seedling survival near adults of their hosts). Many empirical studies have investigated whether predators are distance-responsive; however, few studies have examined whether distance-responsiveness matters for how predators maintain tree diversity. Using a site-occupancy model, we show analytically that distance-responsive predators are actually less able to maintain diversity than specialist predators that are not distance-responsive. Generally, specialist predators maintain diversity because they become rare when their host's densities are low, reducing predation risk. However, if predators are distance-responsive, and most seeds cannot disperse away from these predators, then seed predation rates will remain high, even if predator density is low across the landscape. Consequently, a reduction in a host's population density may not lead to a significant reduction in seed and seedling predation. We show that habitat partitioning can cause recruitment to be highest near conspecific adults, even in the presence of distance-responsive predators, without any change in the effect that the predators have on coexistence (a result contrary to predictions of the Janzen-Connell hypothesis). Rather, specialist predators and habitat partitioning have additive effects on species coexistence in our model, i.e., neither mechanism alters the effect of the other one.

AB - The Janzen-Connell hypothesis states that tree diversity in tropical forests is maintained by specialist predators that are distance- or density-responsive (i.e. predators that reduce seed or seedling survival near adults of their hosts). Many empirical studies have investigated whether predators are distance-responsive; however, few studies have examined whether distance-responsiveness matters for how predators maintain tree diversity. Using a site-occupancy model, we show analytically that distance-responsive predators are actually less able to maintain diversity than specialist predators that are not distance-responsive. Generally, specialist predators maintain diversity because they become rare when their host's densities are low, reducing predation risk. However, if predators are distance-responsive, and most seeds cannot disperse away from these predators, then seed predation rates will remain high, even if predator density is low across the landscape. Consequently, a reduction in a host's population density may not lead to a significant reduction in seed and seedling predation. We show that habitat partitioning can cause recruitment to be highest near conspecific adults, even in the presence of distance-responsive predators, without any change in the effect that the predators have on coexistence (a result contrary to predictions of the Janzen-Connell hypothesis). Rather, specialist predators and habitat partitioning have additive effects on species coexistence in our model, i.e., neither mechanism alters the effect of the other one.

KW - Coexistence

KW - Fitness-density covariance

KW - Habitat partitioning

KW - Janzen-Connell hypothesis

KW - Predator partitioning

KW - Spatial storage effect

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84959557324&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84959557324&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.tpb.2015.10.006

DO - 10.1016/j.tpb.2015.10.006

M3 - Article

C2 - 26525355

AN - SCOPUS:84959557324

VL - 106

SP - 60

EP - 70

JO - Theoretical Population Biology

JF - Theoretical Population Biology

SN - 0040-5809

ER -