Distribution of knowledge, group network structure, and group performance

Diane L. Rulke, Joseph J Galaskiewicz

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

205 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This study investigates the effect of knowledge distribution and group structure on performance in MBA game teams. We found that group performance was contingent on the distribution of knowledge within the group and networks of social relationships among group members. Studying 39 teams of MBA students in two management simulation games, we found that, in general, groups that had broadly distributed knowledge, i.e., groups made up of members who had general knowledge, outperformed groups that had knowledge concentrated in different members, i.e., groups made up of members who had specialized or both specialized and general knowledge. However, the advantage that the former enjoyed over the latter disappeared when groups of specialists or mixed groups had decentralized network structures.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)612-625
Number of pages14
JournalManagement Science
Volume46
Issue number5
StatePublished - May 2000
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Students
Network structure
Group performance
Social relationships
Simulation games

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Management of Technology and Innovation
  • Strategy and Management
  • Management Science and Operations Research

Cite this

Distribution of knowledge, group network structure, and group performance. / Rulke, Diane L.; Galaskiewicz, Joseph J.

In: Management Science, Vol. 46, No. 5, 05.2000, p. 612-625.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{d18961041c89415d80cbf21305e58240,
title = "Distribution of knowledge, group network structure, and group performance",
abstract = "This study investigates the effect of knowledge distribution and group structure on performance in MBA game teams. We found that group performance was contingent on the distribution of knowledge within the group and networks of social relationships among group members. Studying 39 teams of MBA students in two management simulation games, we found that, in general, groups that had broadly distributed knowledge, i.e., groups made up of members who had general knowledge, outperformed groups that had knowledge concentrated in different members, i.e., groups made up of members who had specialized or both specialized and general knowledge. However, the advantage that the former enjoyed over the latter disappeared when groups of specialists or mixed groups had decentralized network structures.",
author = "Rulke, {Diane L.} and Galaskiewicz, {Joseph J}",
year = "2000",
month = "5",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "46",
pages = "612--625",
journal = "Management Science",
issn = "0025-1909",
publisher = "INFORMS Inst.for Operations Res.and the Management Sciences",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Distribution of knowledge, group network structure, and group performance

AU - Rulke, Diane L.

AU - Galaskiewicz, Joseph J

PY - 2000/5

Y1 - 2000/5

N2 - This study investigates the effect of knowledge distribution and group structure on performance in MBA game teams. We found that group performance was contingent on the distribution of knowledge within the group and networks of social relationships among group members. Studying 39 teams of MBA students in two management simulation games, we found that, in general, groups that had broadly distributed knowledge, i.e., groups made up of members who had general knowledge, outperformed groups that had knowledge concentrated in different members, i.e., groups made up of members who had specialized or both specialized and general knowledge. However, the advantage that the former enjoyed over the latter disappeared when groups of specialists or mixed groups had decentralized network structures.

AB - This study investigates the effect of knowledge distribution and group structure on performance in MBA game teams. We found that group performance was contingent on the distribution of knowledge within the group and networks of social relationships among group members. Studying 39 teams of MBA students in two management simulation games, we found that, in general, groups that had broadly distributed knowledge, i.e., groups made up of members who had general knowledge, outperformed groups that had knowledge concentrated in different members, i.e., groups made up of members who had specialized or both specialized and general knowledge. However, the advantage that the former enjoyed over the latter disappeared when groups of specialists or mixed groups had decentralized network structures.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0033718905&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0033718905&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0033718905

VL - 46

SP - 612

EP - 625

JO - Management Science

JF - Management Science

SN - 0025-1909

IS - 5

ER -