Diversity and biomass dynamics of marine algae in Biosphere II's tropical reef macrocosm

Leah Bymers, Edward P. Glenn, Stephen G. Nelson, Kevin Fitzsimmons

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Macrocosms can be used to study complex ecological processes in a small physical space, but the validity of the studies depends on how well the macrocosm simulates natural ecosystem functions. We measured the standing crop of macroalgae and nutrient levels over 4 years in the Biosphere II macrocosm tropical reef biome at Oracle, Arizona. Ten years after this system was closed to outside introductions, it still contained 35 species of macroalgae, within the range found on natural reefs. The macroalgae community was recognizable as a late-successional, coralline algal turf community similar to those found in the low-energy portions of inner tropical reefs. However, biomass values for the most abundant species were in a continual state of flux over the study, and no single species was dominant. Nutrient levels were also unexpectedly dynamic, with dissolved inorganic phosphorous, nitrate, and ammonium each varying by a factor of 10 over the study. The dynamic nature of biomass and nutrient cycles would make it difficult to use this macrocosm for controlled studies. On the other hand, the community dynamics in the Biosphere II ocean may shed light on processes controlling biodiversity and succession on natural reefs. The apparently chaotic swings in biomass and nutrient levels suggested that the paradox of the plankton, which explains how seemingly uniform aquatic environments can support a wide diversity of planktonic forms, may apply to reef macroalgae as well. The Biosphere II ocean biome demonstrates that a diverse macroalgal reef community can be restored relatively easily, supporting the feasibility of actively restoring damaged natural reefs. Macrocosms such as this could be used in manipulative experiments to study the effects of nutrient enrichment and herbivory on coral-algal phase shifts.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)442-456
Number of pages15
JournalEcological Engineering
Volume25
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 1 2005

Fingerprint

algae
Reefs
Algae
biosphere
reefs
Biomass
reef
alga
Nutrients
biomass
macroalgae
biome
ecosystems
nutrient
nutrients
oceans
Plankton
algal community
Biodiversity
community dynamics

Keywords

  • Biodiversity
  • Biosphere II
  • Chaos
  • Coral reef restoration
  • Functional form hypothesis
  • Intermediate disturbance
  • Niche diversification
  • Paradox of the plankton
  • Seaweed
  • Succession

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
  • Ecology
  • Environmental Engineering

Cite this

Diversity and biomass dynamics of marine algae in Biosphere II's tropical reef macrocosm. / Bymers, Leah; Glenn, Edward P.; Nelson, Stephen G.; Fitzsimmons, Kevin.

In: Ecological Engineering, Vol. 25, No. 4, 01.11.2005, p. 442-456.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Bymers, Leah ; Glenn, Edward P. ; Nelson, Stephen G. ; Fitzsimmons, Kevin. / Diversity and biomass dynamics of marine algae in Biosphere II's tropical reef macrocosm. In: Ecological Engineering. 2005 ; Vol. 25, No. 4. pp. 442-456.
@article{1752ce8fef6b45c1b9713f63237cd31e,
title = "Diversity and biomass dynamics of marine algae in Biosphere II's tropical reef macrocosm",
abstract = "Macrocosms can be used to study complex ecological processes in a small physical space, but the validity of the studies depends on how well the macrocosm simulates natural ecosystem functions. We measured the standing crop of macroalgae and nutrient levels over 4 years in the Biosphere II macrocosm tropical reef biome at Oracle, Arizona. Ten years after this system was closed to outside introductions, it still contained 35 species of macroalgae, within the range found on natural reefs. The macroalgae community was recognizable as a late-successional, coralline algal turf community similar to those found in the low-energy portions of inner tropical reefs. However, biomass values for the most abundant species were in a continual state of flux over the study, and no single species was dominant. Nutrient levels were also unexpectedly dynamic, with dissolved inorganic phosphorous, nitrate, and ammonium each varying by a factor of 10 over the study. The dynamic nature of biomass and nutrient cycles would make it difficult to use this macrocosm for controlled studies. On the other hand, the community dynamics in the Biosphere II ocean may shed light on processes controlling biodiversity and succession on natural reefs. The apparently chaotic swings in biomass and nutrient levels suggested that the paradox of the plankton, which explains how seemingly uniform aquatic environments can support a wide diversity of planktonic forms, may apply to reef macroalgae as well. The Biosphere II ocean biome demonstrates that a diverse macroalgal reef community can be restored relatively easily, supporting the feasibility of actively restoring damaged natural reefs. Macrocosms such as this could be used in manipulative experiments to study the effects of nutrient enrichment and herbivory on coral-algal phase shifts.",
keywords = "Biodiversity, Biosphere II, Chaos, Coral reef restoration, Functional form hypothesis, Intermediate disturbance, Niche diversification, Paradox of the plankton, Seaweed, Succession",
author = "Leah Bymers and Glenn, {Edward P.} and Nelson, {Stephen G.} and Kevin Fitzsimmons",
year = "2005",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.ecoleng.2005.07.014",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "25",
pages = "442--456",
journal = "Ecological Engineering",
issn = "0925-8574",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Diversity and biomass dynamics of marine algae in Biosphere II's tropical reef macrocosm

AU - Bymers, Leah

AU - Glenn, Edward P.

AU - Nelson, Stephen G.

AU - Fitzsimmons, Kevin

PY - 2005/11/1

Y1 - 2005/11/1

N2 - Macrocosms can be used to study complex ecological processes in a small physical space, but the validity of the studies depends on how well the macrocosm simulates natural ecosystem functions. We measured the standing crop of macroalgae and nutrient levels over 4 years in the Biosphere II macrocosm tropical reef biome at Oracle, Arizona. Ten years after this system was closed to outside introductions, it still contained 35 species of macroalgae, within the range found on natural reefs. The macroalgae community was recognizable as a late-successional, coralline algal turf community similar to those found in the low-energy portions of inner tropical reefs. However, biomass values for the most abundant species were in a continual state of flux over the study, and no single species was dominant. Nutrient levels were also unexpectedly dynamic, with dissolved inorganic phosphorous, nitrate, and ammonium each varying by a factor of 10 over the study. The dynamic nature of biomass and nutrient cycles would make it difficult to use this macrocosm for controlled studies. On the other hand, the community dynamics in the Biosphere II ocean may shed light on processes controlling biodiversity and succession on natural reefs. The apparently chaotic swings in biomass and nutrient levels suggested that the paradox of the plankton, which explains how seemingly uniform aquatic environments can support a wide diversity of planktonic forms, may apply to reef macroalgae as well. The Biosphere II ocean biome demonstrates that a diverse macroalgal reef community can be restored relatively easily, supporting the feasibility of actively restoring damaged natural reefs. Macrocosms such as this could be used in manipulative experiments to study the effects of nutrient enrichment and herbivory on coral-algal phase shifts.

AB - Macrocosms can be used to study complex ecological processes in a small physical space, but the validity of the studies depends on how well the macrocosm simulates natural ecosystem functions. We measured the standing crop of macroalgae and nutrient levels over 4 years in the Biosphere II macrocosm tropical reef biome at Oracle, Arizona. Ten years after this system was closed to outside introductions, it still contained 35 species of macroalgae, within the range found on natural reefs. The macroalgae community was recognizable as a late-successional, coralline algal turf community similar to those found in the low-energy portions of inner tropical reefs. However, biomass values for the most abundant species were in a continual state of flux over the study, and no single species was dominant. Nutrient levels were also unexpectedly dynamic, with dissolved inorganic phosphorous, nitrate, and ammonium each varying by a factor of 10 over the study. The dynamic nature of biomass and nutrient cycles would make it difficult to use this macrocosm for controlled studies. On the other hand, the community dynamics in the Biosphere II ocean may shed light on processes controlling biodiversity and succession on natural reefs. The apparently chaotic swings in biomass and nutrient levels suggested that the paradox of the plankton, which explains how seemingly uniform aquatic environments can support a wide diversity of planktonic forms, may apply to reef macroalgae as well. The Biosphere II ocean biome demonstrates that a diverse macroalgal reef community can be restored relatively easily, supporting the feasibility of actively restoring damaged natural reefs. Macrocosms such as this could be used in manipulative experiments to study the effects of nutrient enrichment and herbivory on coral-algal phase shifts.

KW - Biodiversity

KW - Biosphere II

KW - Chaos

KW - Coral reef restoration

KW - Functional form hypothesis

KW - Intermediate disturbance

KW - Niche diversification

KW - Paradox of the plankton

KW - Seaweed

KW - Succession

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=27644462331&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=27644462331&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2005.07.014

DO - 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2005.07.014

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:27644462331

VL - 25

SP - 442

EP - 456

JO - Ecological Engineering

JF - Ecological Engineering

SN - 0925-8574

IS - 4

ER -