Diversity in everyday research practice: The case of data editing

Erin E Leahey, Barbara Entwisle, Peter Einaudi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

15 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

How should social science researchers deal with data inaccuracies? This article uses Web-based survey data collected from faculty members in three social science disciplines to document variation in views about data editing. Through an analysis of qualitative responses to a hypothetical vignette, the authors demonstrate that a wide range of opinion surrounds the "proper" use of data. Reactions are to some extent contingent on discipline and experience with different types of data and data collection methods. They also depend on characteristics of the data-editing situation - for example, whether the problem is with an independent or dependent variable. Even taking these social and situational factors into account, however, there is still substantial diversity in vignette responses. Normative standards that pervade other aspects of the research process have not yet emerged for data editing.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)64-89
Number of pages26
JournalSociological Methods and Research
Volume32
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 2003

Fingerprint

research practice
social science
data collection method
research process
experience

Keywords

  • Data cleaning
  • Data management
  • Disciplinary standards
  • Research practice
  • Vignette analysis

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Sciences (miscellaneous)
  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

Diversity in everyday research practice : The case of data editing. / Leahey, Erin E; Entwisle, Barbara; Einaudi, Peter.

In: Sociological Methods and Research, Vol. 32, No. 1, 08.2003, p. 64-89.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Leahey, Erin E ; Entwisle, Barbara ; Einaudi, Peter. / Diversity in everyday research practice : The case of data editing. In: Sociological Methods and Research. 2003 ; Vol. 32, No. 1. pp. 64-89.
@article{aa6e52e7a75d416bb449aafb2f028f49,
title = "Diversity in everyday research practice: The case of data editing",
abstract = "How should social science researchers deal with data inaccuracies? This article uses Web-based survey data collected from faculty members in three social science disciplines to document variation in views about data editing. Through an analysis of qualitative responses to a hypothetical vignette, the authors demonstrate that a wide range of opinion surrounds the {"}proper{"} use of data. Reactions are to some extent contingent on discipline and experience with different types of data and data collection methods. They also depend on characteristics of the data-editing situation - for example, whether the problem is with an independent or dependent variable. Even taking these social and situational factors into account, however, there is still substantial diversity in vignette responses. Normative standards that pervade other aspects of the research process have not yet emerged for data editing.",
keywords = "Data cleaning, Data management, Disciplinary standards, Research practice, Vignette analysis",
author = "Leahey, {Erin E} and Barbara Entwisle and Peter Einaudi",
year = "2003",
month = "8",
doi = "10.1177/0049124103253461",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "32",
pages = "64--89",
journal = "Sociological Methods and Research",
issn = "0049-1241",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Diversity in everyday research practice

T2 - The case of data editing

AU - Leahey, Erin E

AU - Entwisle, Barbara

AU - Einaudi, Peter

PY - 2003/8

Y1 - 2003/8

N2 - How should social science researchers deal with data inaccuracies? This article uses Web-based survey data collected from faculty members in three social science disciplines to document variation in views about data editing. Through an analysis of qualitative responses to a hypothetical vignette, the authors demonstrate that a wide range of opinion surrounds the "proper" use of data. Reactions are to some extent contingent on discipline and experience with different types of data and data collection methods. They also depend on characteristics of the data-editing situation - for example, whether the problem is with an independent or dependent variable. Even taking these social and situational factors into account, however, there is still substantial diversity in vignette responses. Normative standards that pervade other aspects of the research process have not yet emerged for data editing.

AB - How should social science researchers deal with data inaccuracies? This article uses Web-based survey data collected from faculty members in three social science disciplines to document variation in views about data editing. Through an analysis of qualitative responses to a hypothetical vignette, the authors demonstrate that a wide range of opinion surrounds the "proper" use of data. Reactions are to some extent contingent on discipline and experience with different types of data and data collection methods. They also depend on characteristics of the data-editing situation - for example, whether the problem is with an independent or dependent variable. Even taking these social and situational factors into account, however, there is still substantial diversity in vignette responses. Normative standards that pervade other aspects of the research process have not yet emerged for data editing.

KW - Data cleaning

KW - Data management

KW - Disciplinary standards

KW - Research practice

KW - Vignette analysis

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0041569912&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0041569912&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0049124103253461

DO - 10.1177/0049124103253461

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0041569912

VL - 32

SP - 64

EP - 89

JO - Sociological Methods and Research

JF - Sociological Methods and Research

SN - 0049-1241

IS - 1

ER -