Diversity in the moral sciences

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

Pete Boettke’s “What Is Still Wrong with the Austrian School of Economics?” sketches a program for Austrian economics based on a Kuhnesque analysis of scientific communities. His core recommendations focus on what we might call the Uptake and Diffusion dimensions of the scientific enterprise. If taken as a core commitment, they entail an Integrationist program, a concomitant of which is a reduction in the unique insights of the Austrian approach and, so, an overall reduction of the diversity of perspectives in political economy and moral sciences. A cost of this program is to decrease the diversity of perspectives in economics, which in turn decreases the ability of Republic of Economic Science to explore and solve a wider variety of problems. The author presents the “Fundamental Diversity Dilemma,” according to which there is a trade-off between uptake/plausibility and diversity: as we increase uptake and plausibility, we decrease diversity. The author concludes with a defense of the role of heterodox research programs, and questioning the focus on a small set of metrics to indicate excellent and important research.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationAdvances in Austrian Economics
PublisherEmerald Group Publishing Ltd.
Pages49-59
Number of pages11
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 28 2019

Publication series

NameAdvances in Austrian Economics
Volume24
ISSN (Print)1529-2134

Fingerprint

Austrian school of economics
Economics of science
Economics
Austrian economics
Research program
Trade-offs
Costs
Scientific community
Political economy

Keywords

  • Boettke
  • Categorizations
  • Diversity
  • Moral science
  • Perspectives
  • Scientific communities

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Economics and Econometrics

Cite this

Gaus, G. (2019). Diversity in the moral sciences. In Advances in Austrian Economics (pp. 49-59). (Advances in Austrian Economics; Vol. 24). Emerald Group Publishing Ltd.. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1529-213420190000024005

Diversity in the moral sciences. / Gaus, Gerald.

Advances in Austrian Economics. Emerald Group Publishing Ltd., 2019. p. 49-59 (Advances in Austrian Economics; Vol. 24).

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Gaus, G 2019, Diversity in the moral sciences. in Advances in Austrian Economics. Advances in Austrian Economics, vol. 24, Emerald Group Publishing Ltd., pp. 49-59. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1529-213420190000024005
Gaus G. Diversity in the moral sciences. In Advances in Austrian Economics. Emerald Group Publishing Ltd. 2019. p. 49-59. (Advances in Austrian Economics). https://doi.org/10.1108/S1529-213420190000024005
Gaus, Gerald. / Diversity in the moral sciences. Advances in Austrian Economics. Emerald Group Publishing Ltd., 2019. pp. 49-59 (Advances in Austrian Economics).
@inbook{4033513693164796ad484a3b34fd3690,
title = "Diversity in the moral sciences",
abstract = "Pete Boettke’s “What Is Still Wrong with the Austrian School of Economics?” sketches a program for Austrian economics based on a Kuhnesque analysis of scientific communities. His core recommendations focus on what we might call the Uptake and Diffusion dimensions of the scientific enterprise. If taken as a core commitment, they entail an Integrationist program, a concomitant of which is a reduction in the unique insights of the Austrian approach and, so, an overall reduction of the diversity of perspectives in political economy and moral sciences. A cost of this program is to decrease the diversity of perspectives in economics, which in turn decreases the ability of Republic of Economic Science to explore and solve a wider variety of problems. The author presents the “Fundamental Diversity Dilemma,” according to which there is a trade-off between uptake/plausibility and diversity: as we increase uptake and plausibility, we decrease diversity. The author concludes with a defense of the role of heterodox research programs, and questioning the focus on a small set of metrics to indicate excellent and important research.",
keywords = "Boettke, Categorizations, Diversity, Moral science, Perspectives, Scientific communities",
author = "Gerald Gaus",
year = "2019",
month = "10",
day = "28",
doi = "10.1108/S1529-213420190000024005",
language = "English (US)",
series = "Advances in Austrian Economics",
publisher = "Emerald Group Publishing Ltd.",
pages = "49--59",
booktitle = "Advances in Austrian Economics",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - Diversity in the moral sciences

AU - Gaus, Gerald

PY - 2019/10/28

Y1 - 2019/10/28

N2 - Pete Boettke’s “What Is Still Wrong with the Austrian School of Economics?” sketches a program for Austrian economics based on a Kuhnesque analysis of scientific communities. His core recommendations focus on what we might call the Uptake and Diffusion dimensions of the scientific enterprise. If taken as a core commitment, they entail an Integrationist program, a concomitant of which is a reduction in the unique insights of the Austrian approach and, so, an overall reduction of the diversity of perspectives in political economy and moral sciences. A cost of this program is to decrease the diversity of perspectives in economics, which in turn decreases the ability of Republic of Economic Science to explore and solve a wider variety of problems. The author presents the “Fundamental Diversity Dilemma,” according to which there is a trade-off between uptake/plausibility and diversity: as we increase uptake and plausibility, we decrease diversity. The author concludes with a defense of the role of heterodox research programs, and questioning the focus on a small set of metrics to indicate excellent and important research.

AB - Pete Boettke’s “What Is Still Wrong with the Austrian School of Economics?” sketches a program for Austrian economics based on a Kuhnesque analysis of scientific communities. His core recommendations focus on what we might call the Uptake and Diffusion dimensions of the scientific enterprise. If taken as a core commitment, they entail an Integrationist program, a concomitant of which is a reduction in the unique insights of the Austrian approach and, so, an overall reduction of the diversity of perspectives in political economy and moral sciences. A cost of this program is to decrease the diversity of perspectives in economics, which in turn decreases the ability of Republic of Economic Science to explore and solve a wider variety of problems. The author presents the “Fundamental Diversity Dilemma,” according to which there is a trade-off between uptake/plausibility and diversity: as we increase uptake and plausibility, we decrease diversity. The author concludes with a defense of the role of heterodox research programs, and questioning the focus on a small set of metrics to indicate excellent and important research.

KW - Boettke

KW - Categorizations

KW - Diversity

KW - Moral science

KW - Perspectives

KW - Scientific communities

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85073565166&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85073565166&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1108/S1529-213420190000024005

DO - 10.1108/S1529-213420190000024005

M3 - Chapter

AN - SCOPUS:85073565166

T3 - Advances in Austrian Economics

SP - 49

EP - 59

BT - Advances in Austrian Economics

PB - Emerald Group Publishing Ltd.

ER -