Division of labor of anthers in heterantherous plants: flexibility of bee pollen collection behavior may serve to keep plants honest

Daniel R Papaj, Stephen L. Buchmann, Avery L. Russell

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Heteranthery is thought to reflect a division of labor, with some anthers serving a pollinator-feeding function and others serving a pollinating function. Mutualism theory predicts that each participant should try to maximize the benefit it receives from its partner: plants should allocate more pollen to pollination, and pollinators should collect more pollen. Accordingly, plant and pollinator may engage in a ‘tug of war’ with respect to pollen from each anther type, resulting in incomplete division of labor. Here, we explored this idea by conducting a fully factorial manipulation of the availability of pollen in long and short anthers of staminate flowers of Solanum houstonii. We found the following: (1) Bumble bees (Bombus impatiens) preferred to sonicate (collect pollen from) short anthers over long anthers, consistent with a role as feeding and pollinating anthers, respectively; (2) Blocking short anther pores alone increased sonication of long anthers and resulted in collection of pollen from long anthers; (3) Blocking long anther pores alone did not influence sonication of short anthers; (4) The increase in sonication of long anthers, when short anther pores are blocked, was greater when pollen was available in long anthers; (5) Despite shifting sonication effort to long anthers, bees do not move their bodies closer to long anther pores where pollen could be collected more effectively; and (6) analysis of the growth of corbicular loads over time spent buzzing indicates that significant amounts of pollen are collected from long anthers as well as short anthers. We conclude that bees can flexibly increase pollen collection from pollinating anthers, but are constrained from fully exploiting this pollen. This results in checks and balances between plant and bee that may help maintain heteranthery.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1-9
Number of pages9
JournalArthropod-Plant Interactions
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Feb 17 2017

Fingerprint

polyethism
labor division
bee
anthers
pollen
pollinator
pollination
pollinating insects
bee pollen
Apoidea
tug
mutualism
Bombus impatiens
flower

Keywords

  • Behavioral plasticity
  • Bumble bee
  • Buzz pollination
  • Floral sonication
  • Heteranthery
  • Pollen collection

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
  • Ecology
  • Agronomy and Crop Science
  • Insect Science

Cite this

Division of labor of anthers in heterantherous plants : flexibility of bee pollen collection behavior may serve to keep plants honest. / Papaj, Daniel R; Buchmann, Stephen L.; Russell, Avery L.

In: Arthropod-Plant Interactions, 17.02.2017, p. 1-9.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{5255bc79be9e44dd840812167dbe9ae6,
title = "Division of labor of anthers in heterantherous plants: flexibility of bee pollen collection behavior may serve to keep plants honest",
abstract = "Heteranthery is thought to reflect a division of labor, with some anthers serving a pollinator-feeding function and others serving a pollinating function. Mutualism theory predicts that each participant should try to maximize the benefit it receives from its partner: plants should allocate more pollen to pollination, and pollinators should collect more pollen. Accordingly, plant and pollinator may engage in a ‘tug of war’ with respect to pollen from each anther type, resulting in incomplete division of labor. Here, we explored this idea by conducting a fully factorial manipulation of the availability of pollen in long and short anthers of staminate flowers of Solanum houstonii. We found the following: (1) Bumble bees (Bombus impatiens) preferred to sonicate (collect pollen from) short anthers over long anthers, consistent with a role as feeding and pollinating anthers, respectively; (2) Blocking short anther pores alone increased sonication of long anthers and resulted in collection of pollen from long anthers; (3) Blocking long anther pores alone did not influence sonication of short anthers; (4) The increase in sonication of long anthers, when short anther pores are blocked, was greater when pollen was available in long anthers; (5) Despite shifting sonication effort to long anthers, bees do not move their bodies closer to long anther pores where pollen could be collected more effectively; and (6) analysis of the growth of corbicular loads over time spent buzzing indicates that significant amounts of pollen are collected from long anthers as well as short anthers. We conclude that bees can flexibly increase pollen collection from pollinating anthers, but are constrained from fully exploiting this pollen. This results in checks and balances between plant and bee that may help maintain heteranthery.",
keywords = "Behavioral plasticity, Bumble bee, Buzz pollination, Floral sonication, Heteranthery, Pollen collection",
author = "Papaj, {Daniel R} and Buchmann, {Stephen L.} and Russell, {Avery L.}",
year = "2017",
month = "2",
day = "17",
doi = "10.1007/s11829-017-9497-5",
language = "English (US)",
pages = "1--9",
journal = "Arthropod-Plant Interactions",
issn = "1872-8855",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Division of labor of anthers in heterantherous plants

T2 - flexibility of bee pollen collection behavior may serve to keep plants honest

AU - Papaj, Daniel R

AU - Buchmann, Stephen L.

AU - Russell, Avery L.

PY - 2017/2/17

Y1 - 2017/2/17

N2 - Heteranthery is thought to reflect a division of labor, with some anthers serving a pollinator-feeding function and others serving a pollinating function. Mutualism theory predicts that each participant should try to maximize the benefit it receives from its partner: plants should allocate more pollen to pollination, and pollinators should collect more pollen. Accordingly, plant and pollinator may engage in a ‘tug of war’ with respect to pollen from each anther type, resulting in incomplete division of labor. Here, we explored this idea by conducting a fully factorial manipulation of the availability of pollen in long and short anthers of staminate flowers of Solanum houstonii. We found the following: (1) Bumble bees (Bombus impatiens) preferred to sonicate (collect pollen from) short anthers over long anthers, consistent with a role as feeding and pollinating anthers, respectively; (2) Blocking short anther pores alone increased sonication of long anthers and resulted in collection of pollen from long anthers; (3) Blocking long anther pores alone did not influence sonication of short anthers; (4) The increase in sonication of long anthers, when short anther pores are blocked, was greater when pollen was available in long anthers; (5) Despite shifting sonication effort to long anthers, bees do not move their bodies closer to long anther pores where pollen could be collected more effectively; and (6) analysis of the growth of corbicular loads over time spent buzzing indicates that significant amounts of pollen are collected from long anthers as well as short anthers. We conclude that bees can flexibly increase pollen collection from pollinating anthers, but are constrained from fully exploiting this pollen. This results in checks and balances between plant and bee that may help maintain heteranthery.

AB - Heteranthery is thought to reflect a division of labor, with some anthers serving a pollinator-feeding function and others serving a pollinating function. Mutualism theory predicts that each participant should try to maximize the benefit it receives from its partner: plants should allocate more pollen to pollination, and pollinators should collect more pollen. Accordingly, plant and pollinator may engage in a ‘tug of war’ with respect to pollen from each anther type, resulting in incomplete division of labor. Here, we explored this idea by conducting a fully factorial manipulation of the availability of pollen in long and short anthers of staminate flowers of Solanum houstonii. We found the following: (1) Bumble bees (Bombus impatiens) preferred to sonicate (collect pollen from) short anthers over long anthers, consistent with a role as feeding and pollinating anthers, respectively; (2) Blocking short anther pores alone increased sonication of long anthers and resulted in collection of pollen from long anthers; (3) Blocking long anther pores alone did not influence sonication of short anthers; (4) The increase in sonication of long anthers, when short anther pores are blocked, was greater when pollen was available in long anthers; (5) Despite shifting sonication effort to long anthers, bees do not move their bodies closer to long anther pores where pollen could be collected more effectively; and (6) analysis of the growth of corbicular loads over time spent buzzing indicates that significant amounts of pollen are collected from long anthers as well as short anthers. We conclude that bees can flexibly increase pollen collection from pollinating anthers, but are constrained from fully exploiting this pollen. This results in checks and balances between plant and bee that may help maintain heteranthery.

KW - Behavioral plasticity

KW - Bumble bee

KW - Buzz pollination

KW - Floral sonication

KW - Heteranthery

KW - Pollen collection

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85013070363&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85013070363&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s11829-017-9497-5

DO - 10.1007/s11829-017-9497-5

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85013070363

SP - 1

EP - 9

JO - Arthropod-Plant Interactions

JF - Arthropod-Plant Interactions

SN - 1872-8855

ER -