Do dynamic global vegetation models capture the seasonality of carbon fluxes in the Amazon basin? A data-model intercomparison

Natalia Restrepo-Coupe, Naomi M. Levine, Bradley O. Christoffersen, Loren P. Albert, Jin Wu, Marcos H. Costa, David Galbraith, Hewlley Imbuzeiro, Giordane Martins, Alessandro C. da Araujo, Yadvinder S. Malhi, Xubin Zeng, Paul Moorcroft, Scott Saleska

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

37 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

To predict forest response to long-term climate change with high confidence requires that dynamic global vegetation models (DGVMs) be successfully tested against ecosystem response to short-term variations in environmental drivers, including regular seasonal patterns. Here, we used an integrated dataset from four forests in the Brasil flux network, spanning a range of dry-season intensities and lengths, to determine how well four state-of-the-art models (IBIS, ED2, JULES, and CLM3.5) simulated the seasonality of carbon exchanges in Amazonian tropical forests. We found that most DGVMs poorly represented the annual cycle of gross primary productivity (GPP), of photosynthetic capacity (Pc), and of other fluxes and pools. Models simulated consistent dry-season declines in GPP in the equatorial Amazon (Manaus K34, Santarem K67, and Caxiuanã CAX); a contrast to observed GPP increases. Model simulated dry-season GPP reductions were driven by an external environmental factor, ‘soil water stress’ and consequently by a constant or decreasing photosynthetic infrastructure (Pc), while observed dry-season GPP resulted from a combination of internal biological (leaf-flush and abscission and increased Pc) and environmental (incoming radiation) causes. Moreover, we found models generally overestimated observed seasonal net ecosystem exchange (NEE) and respiration (Re) at equatorial locations. In contrast, a southern Amazon forest (Jarú RJA) exhibited dry-season declines in GPP and Re consistent with most DGVMs simulations. While water limitation was represented in models and the primary driver of seasonal photosynthesis in southern Amazonia, changes in internal biophysical processes, light-harvesting adaptations (e.g., variations in leaf area index (LAI) and increasing leaf-level assimilation rate related to leaf demography), and allocation lags between leaf and wood, dominated equatorial Amazon carbon flux dynamics and were deficient or absent from current model formulations. Correctly simulating flux seasonality at tropical forests requires a greater understanding and the incorporation of internal biophysical mechanisms in future model developments.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)191-208
Number of pages18
JournalGlobal Change Biology
Volume23
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2017

Fingerprint

carbon flux
seasonality
Data structures
Carbon
Fluxes
vegetation
Productivity
basin
dry season
productivity
Ecosystems
respiration
abscission
net ecosystem exchange
ecosystem response
Photosynthesis
Water
demography
water stress
Climate change

Keywords

  • Amazonia
  • carbon dynamics
  • dynamic global vegetation models
  • ecosystem–climate interactions
  • eddy covariance
  • seasonality
  • tropical forests phenology

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Global and Planetary Change
  • Environmental Chemistry
  • Ecology
  • Environmental Science(all)

Cite this

Do dynamic global vegetation models capture the seasonality of carbon fluxes in the Amazon basin? A data-model intercomparison. / Restrepo-Coupe, Natalia; Levine, Naomi M.; Christoffersen, Bradley O.; Albert, Loren P.; Wu, Jin; Costa, Marcos H.; Galbraith, David; Imbuzeiro, Hewlley; Martins, Giordane; da Araujo, Alessandro C.; Malhi, Yadvinder S.; Zeng, Xubin; Moorcroft, Paul; Saleska, Scott.

In: Global Change Biology, Vol. 23, No. 1, 01.01.2017, p. 191-208.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Restrepo-Coupe, N, Levine, NM, Christoffersen, BO, Albert, LP, Wu, J, Costa, MH, Galbraith, D, Imbuzeiro, H, Martins, G, da Araujo, AC, Malhi, YS, Zeng, X, Moorcroft, P & Saleska, S 2017, 'Do dynamic global vegetation models capture the seasonality of carbon fluxes in the Amazon basin? A data-model intercomparison', Global Change Biology, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 191-208. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.13442
Restrepo-Coupe, Natalia ; Levine, Naomi M. ; Christoffersen, Bradley O. ; Albert, Loren P. ; Wu, Jin ; Costa, Marcos H. ; Galbraith, David ; Imbuzeiro, Hewlley ; Martins, Giordane ; da Araujo, Alessandro C. ; Malhi, Yadvinder S. ; Zeng, Xubin ; Moorcroft, Paul ; Saleska, Scott. / Do dynamic global vegetation models capture the seasonality of carbon fluxes in the Amazon basin? A data-model intercomparison. In: Global Change Biology. 2017 ; Vol. 23, No. 1. pp. 191-208.
@article{e748e7bff20d40619869c1896f50982c,
title = "Do dynamic global vegetation models capture the seasonality of carbon fluxes in the Amazon basin? A data-model intercomparison",
abstract = "To predict forest response to long-term climate change with high confidence requires that dynamic global vegetation models (DGVMs) be successfully tested against ecosystem response to short-term variations in environmental drivers, including regular seasonal patterns. Here, we used an integrated dataset from four forests in the Brasil flux network, spanning a range of dry-season intensities and lengths, to determine how well four state-of-the-art models (IBIS, ED2, JULES, and CLM3.5) simulated the seasonality of carbon exchanges in Amazonian tropical forests. We found that most DGVMs poorly represented the annual cycle of gross primary productivity (GPP), of photosynthetic capacity (Pc), and of other fluxes and pools. Models simulated consistent dry-season declines in GPP in the equatorial Amazon (Manaus K34, Santarem K67, and Caxiuan{\~a} CAX); a contrast to observed GPP increases. Model simulated dry-season GPP reductions were driven by an external environmental factor, ‘soil water stress’ and consequently by a constant or decreasing photosynthetic infrastructure (Pc), while observed dry-season GPP resulted from a combination of internal biological (leaf-flush and abscission and increased Pc) and environmental (incoming radiation) causes. Moreover, we found models generally overestimated observed seasonal net ecosystem exchange (NEE) and respiration (Re) at equatorial locations. In contrast, a southern Amazon forest (Jar{\'u} RJA) exhibited dry-season declines in GPP and Re consistent with most DGVMs simulations. While water limitation was represented in models and the primary driver of seasonal photosynthesis in southern Amazonia, changes in internal biophysical processes, light-harvesting adaptations (e.g., variations in leaf area index (LAI) and increasing leaf-level assimilation rate related to leaf demography), and allocation lags between leaf and wood, dominated equatorial Amazon carbon flux dynamics and were deficient or absent from current model formulations. Correctly simulating flux seasonality at tropical forests requires a greater understanding and the incorporation of internal biophysical mechanisms in future model developments.",
keywords = "Amazonia, carbon dynamics, dynamic global vegetation models, ecosystem–climate interactions, eddy covariance, seasonality, tropical forests phenology",
author = "Natalia Restrepo-Coupe and Levine, {Naomi M.} and Christoffersen, {Bradley O.} and Albert, {Loren P.} and Jin Wu and Costa, {Marcos H.} and David Galbraith and Hewlley Imbuzeiro and Giordane Martins and {da Araujo}, {Alessandro C.} and Malhi, {Yadvinder S.} and Xubin Zeng and Paul Moorcroft and Scott Saleska",
year = "2017",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/gcb.13442",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "23",
pages = "191--208",
journal = "Global Change Biology",
issn = "1354-1013",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Do dynamic global vegetation models capture the seasonality of carbon fluxes in the Amazon basin? A data-model intercomparison

AU - Restrepo-Coupe, Natalia

AU - Levine, Naomi M.

AU - Christoffersen, Bradley O.

AU - Albert, Loren P.

AU - Wu, Jin

AU - Costa, Marcos H.

AU - Galbraith, David

AU - Imbuzeiro, Hewlley

AU - Martins, Giordane

AU - da Araujo, Alessandro C.

AU - Malhi, Yadvinder S.

AU - Zeng, Xubin

AU - Moorcroft, Paul

AU - Saleska, Scott

PY - 2017/1/1

Y1 - 2017/1/1

N2 - To predict forest response to long-term climate change with high confidence requires that dynamic global vegetation models (DGVMs) be successfully tested against ecosystem response to short-term variations in environmental drivers, including regular seasonal patterns. Here, we used an integrated dataset from four forests in the Brasil flux network, spanning a range of dry-season intensities and lengths, to determine how well four state-of-the-art models (IBIS, ED2, JULES, and CLM3.5) simulated the seasonality of carbon exchanges in Amazonian tropical forests. We found that most DGVMs poorly represented the annual cycle of gross primary productivity (GPP), of photosynthetic capacity (Pc), and of other fluxes and pools. Models simulated consistent dry-season declines in GPP in the equatorial Amazon (Manaus K34, Santarem K67, and Caxiuanã CAX); a contrast to observed GPP increases. Model simulated dry-season GPP reductions were driven by an external environmental factor, ‘soil water stress’ and consequently by a constant or decreasing photosynthetic infrastructure (Pc), while observed dry-season GPP resulted from a combination of internal biological (leaf-flush and abscission and increased Pc) and environmental (incoming radiation) causes. Moreover, we found models generally overestimated observed seasonal net ecosystem exchange (NEE) and respiration (Re) at equatorial locations. In contrast, a southern Amazon forest (Jarú RJA) exhibited dry-season declines in GPP and Re consistent with most DGVMs simulations. While water limitation was represented in models and the primary driver of seasonal photosynthesis in southern Amazonia, changes in internal biophysical processes, light-harvesting adaptations (e.g., variations in leaf area index (LAI) and increasing leaf-level assimilation rate related to leaf demography), and allocation lags between leaf and wood, dominated equatorial Amazon carbon flux dynamics and were deficient or absent from current model formulations. Correctly simulating flux seasonality at tropical forests requires a greater understanding and the incorporation of internal biophysical mechanisms in future model developments.

AB - To predict forest response to long-term climate change with high confidence requires that dynamic global vegetation models (DGVMs) be successfully tested against ecosystem response to short-term variations in environmental drivers, including regular seasonal patterns. Here, we used an integrated dataset from four forests in the Brasil flux network, spanning a range of dry-season intensities and lengths, to determine how well four state-of-the-art models (IBIS, ED2, JULES, and CLM3.5) simulated the seasonality of carbon exchanges in Amazonian tropical forests. We found that most DGVMs poorly represented the annual cycle of gross primary productivity (GPP), of photosynthetic capacity (Pc), and of other fluxes and pools. Models simulated consistent dry-season declines in GPP in the equatorial Amazon (Manaus K34, Santarem K67, and Caxiuanã CAX); a contrast to observed GPP increases. Model simulated dry-season GPP reductions were driven by an external environmental factor, ‘soil water stress’ and consequently by a constant or decreasing photosynthetic infrastructure (Pc), while observed dry-season GPP resulted from a combination of internal biological (leaf-flush and abscission and increased Pc) and environmental (incoming radiation) causes. Moreover, we found models generally overestimated observed seasonal net ecosystem exchange (NEE) and respiration (Re) at equatorial locations. In contrast, a southern Amazon forest (Jarú RJA) exhibited dry-season declines in GPP and Re consistent with most DGVMs simulations. While water limitation was represented in models and the primary driver of seasonal photosynthesis in southern Amazonia, changes in internal biophysical processes, light-harvesting adaptations (e.g., variations in leaf area index (LAI) and increasing leaf-level assimilation rate related to leaf demography), and allocation lags between leaf and wood, dominated equatorial Amazon carbon flux dynamics and were deficient or absent from current model formulations. Correctly simulating flux seasonality at tropical forests requires a greater understanding and the incorporation of internal biophysical mechanisms in future model developments.

KW - Amazonia

KW - carbon dynamics

KW - dynamic global vegetation models

KW - ecosystem–climate interactions

KW - eddy covariance

KW - seasonality

KW - tropical forests phenology

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84983672172&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84983672172&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/gcb.13442

DO - 10.1111/gcb.13442

M3 - Article

C2 - 27436068

AN - SCOPUS:84983672172

VL - 23

SP - 191

EP - 208

JO - Global Change Biology

JF - Global Change Biology

SN - 1354-1013

IS - 1

ER -