Do medication samples jeopardize patient safety?

Andrea S. Franks, Shaunta M. Ray, Lorraine S. Wallace, Amy J. Keenum, Barry D Weiss

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Medication samples are commonly dispensed by prescribers. Written consumer medication information (CMI) provided with sample packaging is an important source of patient information. Although one-third of Americans have health literacy deficiencies, previous studies have found that CMI is often too complex for many patients to understand. This may prevent patients from using these medications appropriately. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate readability and formatting characteristics of CMI included with nonsolid (ie, topical cream/lotion, inhalation, transdermal) drug samples. METHODS: We collected a convenience sample of nonsolid dosage sample medications (N = 55) from several different private and university-affiliated primary care and specialty physician practices at a large academic medical center in the southeastern US. We noted whether CMI was present and, if it was, we assessed it for instruction presentation, reading level, text size, format/layout, and comprehensibility. RESULTS: Most (43 of 55) products included CMI, either as a separate leaflet or directly on the packaging. Reading level of CMI leaflets ranged from the 6th- to 14th-grade level, with just 4 (16.0%) written at the recommended 6th-grade level. Text font point size was 9.48 ± 2.14 (mean ± SD; range 5-12). Text printed directly on sample packaging averaged 6.61 point ± 2.62 (4-11) font size. Ninety-two percent of CMI leaflets included a combination of text and pictures; only 11.1% of CMI printed directly on the packaging used pictorial aids. CONCLUSIONS: Most CMI accompanying nonsolid medication samples is written at a reading level that exceeds that of many consumers and does not meet recommended standards for readability and comprehensibility of patient education material.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)51-56
Number of pages6
JournalAnnals of Pharmacotherapy
Volume43
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2009

Fingerprint

Product Packaging
Patient Safety
Reading
Inhalation Administration
Health Literacy
Primary Care Physicians
Patient Education

Keywords

  • Drug information
  • Drug samples
  • Health literacy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pharmacology (medical)
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Franks, A. S., Ray, S. M., Wallace, L. S., Keenum, A. J., & Weiss, B. D. (2009). Do medication samples jeopardize patient safety? Annals of Pharmacotherapy, 43(1), 51-56. https://doi.org/10.1345/aph.1L362

Do medication samples jeopardize patient safety? / Franks, Andrea S.; Ray, Shaunta M.; Wallace, Lorraine S.; Keenum, Amy J.; Weiss, Barry D.

In: Annals of Pharmacotherapy, Vol. 43, No. 1, 01.2009, p. 51-56.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Franks, AS, Ray, SM, Wallace, LS, Keenum, AJ & Weiss, BD 2009, 'Do medication samples jeopardize patient safety?', Annals of Pharmacotherapy, vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 51-56. https://doi.org/10.1345/aph.1L362
Franks, Andrea S. ; Ray, Shaunta M. ; Wallace, Lorraine S. ; Keenum, Amy J. ; Weiss, Barry D. / Do medication samples jeopardize patient safety?. In: Annals of Pharmacotherapy. 2009 ; Vol. 43, No. 1. pp. 51-56.
@article{3a54822ff27f426ea8b979a4f35793db,
title = "Do medication samples jeopardize patient safety?",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: Medication samples are commonly dispensed by prescribers. Written consumer medication information (CMI) provided with sample packaging is an important source of patient information. Although one-third of Americans have health literacy deficiencies, previous studies have found that CMI is often too complex for many patients to understand. This may prevent patients from using these medications appropriately. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate readability and formatting characteristics of CMI included with nonsolid (ie, topical cream/lotion, inhalation, transdermal) drug samples. METHODS: We collected a convenience sample of nonsolid dosage sample medications (N = 55) from several different private and university-affiliated primary care and specialty physician practices at a large academic medical center in the southeastern US. We noted whether CMI was present and, if it was, we assessed it for instruction presentation, reading level, text size, format/layout, and comprehensibility. RESULTS: Most (43 of 55) products included CMI, either as a separate leaflet or directly on the packaging. Reading level of CMI leaflets ranged from the 6th- to 14th-grade level, with just 4 (16.0{\%}) written at the recommended 6th-grade level. Text font point size was 9.48 ± 2.14 (mean ± SD; range 5-12). Text printed directly on sample packaging averaged 6.61 point ± 2.62 (4-11) font size. Ninety-two percent of CMI leaflets included a combination of text and pictures; only 11.1{\%} of CMI printed directly on the packaging used pictorial aids. CONCLUSIONS: Most CMI accompanying nonsolid medication samples is written at a reading level that exceeds that of many consumers and does not meet recommended standards for readability and comprehensibility of patient education material.",
keywords = "Drug information, Drug samples, Health literacy",
author = "Franks, {Andrea S.} and Ray, {Shaunta M.} and Wallace, {Lorraine S.} and Keenum, {Amy J.} and Weiss, {Barry D}",
year = "2009",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1345/aph.1L362",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "43",
pages = "51--56",
journal = "Annals of Pharmacotherapy",
issn = "1060-0280",
publisher = "Harvey Whitney Books Company",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Do medication samples jeopardize patient safety?

AU - Franks, Andrea S.

AU - Ray, Shaunta M.

AU - Wallace, Lorraine S.

AU - Keenum, Amy J.

AU - Weiss, Barry D

PY - 2009/1

Y1 - 2009/1

N2 - BACKGROUND: Medication samples are commonly dispensed by prescribers. Written consumer medication information (CMI) provided with sample packaging is an important source of patient information. Although one-third of Americans have health literacy deficiencies, previous studies have found that CMI is often too complex for many patients to understand. This may prevent patients from using these medications appropriately. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate readability and formatting characteristics of CMI included with nonsolid (ie, topical cream/lotion, inhalation, transdermal) drug samples. METHODS: We collected a convenience sample of nonsolid dosage sample medications (N = 55) from several different private and university-affiliated primary care and specialty physician practices at a large academic medical center in the southeastern US. We noted whether CMI was present and, if it was, we assessed it for instruction presentation, reading level, text size, format/layout, and comprehensibility. RESULTS: Most (43 of 55) products included CMI, either as a separate leaflet or directly on the packaging. Reading level of CMI leaflets ranged from the 6th- to 14th-grade level, with just 4 (16.0%) written at the recommended 6th-grade level. Text font point size was 9.48 ± 2.14 (mean ± SD; range 5-12). Text printed directly on sample packaging averaged 6.61 point ± 2.62 (4-11) font size. Ninety-two percent of CMI leaflets included a combination of text and pictures; only 11.1% of CMI printed directly on the packaging used pictorial aids. CONCLUSIONS: Most CMI accompanying nonsolid medication samples is written at a reading level that exceeds that of many consumers and does not meet recommended standards for readability and comprehensibility of patient education material.

AB - BACKGROUND: Medication samples are commonly dispensed by prescribers. Written consumer medication information (CMI) provided with sample packaging is an important source of patient information. Although one-third of Americans have health literacy deficiencies, previous studies have found that CMI is often too complex for many patients to understand. This may prevent patients from using these medications appropriately. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate readability and formatting characteristics of CMI included with nonsolid (ie, topical cream/lotion, inhalation, transdermal) drug samples. METHODS: We collected a convenience sample of nonsolid dosage sample medications (N = 55) from several different private and university-affiliated primary care and specialty physician practices at a large academic medical center in the southeastern US. We noted whether CMI was present and, if it was, we assessed it for instruction presentation, reading level, text size, format/layout, and comprehensibility. RESULTS: Most (43 of 55) products included CMI, either as a separate leaflet or directly on the packaging. Reading level of CMI leaflets ranged from the 6th- to 14th-grade level, with just 4 (16.0%) written at the recommended 6th-grade level. Text font point size was 9.48 ± 2.14 (mean ± SD; range 5-12). Text printed directly on sample packaging averaged 6.61 point ± 2.62 (4-11) font size. Ninety-two percent of CMI leaflets included a combination of text and pictures; only 11.1% of CMI printed directly on the packaging used pictorial aids. CONCLUSIONS: Most CMI accompanying nonsolid medication samples is written at a reading level that exceeds that of many consumers and does not meet recommended standards for readability and comprehensibility of patient education material.

KW - Drug information

KW - Drug samples

KW - Health literacy

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=58549112381&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=58549112381&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1345/aph.1L362

DO - 10.1345/aph.1L362

M3 - Article

VL - 43

SP - 51

EP - 56

JO - Annals of Pharmacotherapy

JF - Annals of Pharmacotherapy

SN - 1060-0280

IS - 1

ER -