Does an autoparasitoid disrupt host suppression provided by a primary parasitoid?

Martha S Hunter, Timothy R. Collier, Suzanne E. Kelly

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

25 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Theory predicts that intraguild consumers such as predators or parasitoids may displace more specialized heterospecific competitors and thereby actually increase the population densities of a shared host or prey. We tested this idea with a native primary parasitoid, Eretmocerus eremicus, and an exotic autoparasitoid Encarsia sophia, both attacking the sweetpotato whitefly Bemisia tabaci. Autoparasitoids are intraguild consumers that attack and kill both the immature stages of hemipteran hosts, such as whiteflies, and heterospecific and conspecific parasitoids. In population cages on cotton plants in the field in 1997 and 1998, we introduced whiteflies and then parasitoids in a replacement design with constant total numbers of parasitoids, as follows: (1) control (whiteflies only), (2) E. eremicus only, (3) E. sophia only, and (4) both E. eremicus and E. sophia. Destructive samples of plants were taken 2, 4, and 6 wk after wasp releases, and immature whitefly and wasp stages were censused. In 1997, there were no significant differences in whitefly densities among treatments. In 1998, the control treatment densities were significantly greater than parasitoid treatments, but there was no difference among the parasitoid treatments, indicating equivalent suppression of whitefly populations by the two parasitoid species. In both years, similar patterns in parasitoid dynamics were observed. Densities of E. eremicus were significantly higher in the absence of E. sophia. In contrast, E. sophia densities were unaffected by the presence of E. eremicus. The results suggest that interference by the autoparasitoid reduced primary parasitoid density, but with no concommitant disruption of host suppression. The results support theoretical predictions that no disruption should occur when both parasitoids are equally efficient and suggest that an autoparasitoid may be as efficient as a primary parasitoid in suppressing host densities.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1459-1469
Number of pages11
JournalEcology
Volume83
Issue number5
StatePublished - May 1 2002

Fingerprint

Eretmocerus eremicus
whitefly
Aleyrodidae
parasitoid
parasitoids
Bemisia tabaci
wasp
immatures
Encarsia
cages
population density
cotton
predators
replacement
predator
prediction

Keywords

  • Bemisia argentifolii
  • Bemisia tabaci
  • Biological control
  • Encarsia sophia
  • Eretmocerus eremicus
  • Exotic species
  • Heteronomous hyperparasitoid
  • Interference competition
  • Interspecific competition
  • Intraguild predation
  • Population regulation
  • Sweetpotato whitefly

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ecology

Cite this

Does an autoparasitoid disrupt host suppression provided by a primary parasitoid? / Hunter, Martha S; Collier, Timothy R.; Kelly, Suzanne E.

In: Ecology, Vol. 83, No. 5, 01.05.2002, p. 1459-1469.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Hunter, MS, Collier, TR & Kelly, SE 2002, 'Does an autoparasitoid disrupt host suppression provided by a primary parasitoid?', Ecology, vol. 83, no. 5, pp. 1459-1469.
Hunter, Martha S ; Collier, Timothy R. ; Kelly, Suzanne E. / Does an autoparasitoid disrupt host suppression provided by a primary parasitoid?. In: Ecology. 2002 ; Vol. 83, No. 5. pp. 1459-1469.
@article{5d3cdfc43bfd42b5af0b78427d9888ff,
title = "Does an autoparasitoid disrupt host suppression provided by a primary parasitoid?",
abstract = "Theory predicts that intraguild consumers such as predators or parasitoids may displace more specialized heterospecific competitors and thereby actually increase the population densities of a shared host or prey. We tested this idea with a native primary parasitoid, Eretmocerus eremicus, and an exotic autoparasitoid Encarsia sophia, both attacking the sweetpotato whitefly Bemisia tabaci. Autoparasitoids are intraguild consumers that attack and kill both the immature stages of hemipteran hosts, such as whiteflies, and heterospecific and conspecific parasitoids. In population cages on cotton plants in the field in 1997 and 1998, we introduced whiteflies and then parasitoids in a replacement design with constant total numbers of parasitoids, as follows: (1) control (whiteflies only), (2) E. eremicus only, (3) E. sophia only, and (4) both E. eremicus and E. sophia. Destructive samples of plants were taken 2, 4, and 6 wk after wasp releases, and immature whitefly and wasp stages were censused. In 1997, there were no significant differences in whitefly densities among treatments. In 1998, the control treatment densities were significantly greater than parasitoid treatments, but there was no difference among the parasitoid treatments, indicating equivalent suppression of whitefly populations by the two parasitoid species. In both years, similar patterns in parasitoid dynamics were observed. Densities of E. eremicus were significantly higher in the absence of E. sophia. In contrast, E. sophia densities were unaffected by the presence of E. eremicus. The results suggest that interference by the autoparasitoid reduced primary parasitoid density, but with no concommitant disruption of host suppression. The results support theoretical predictions that no disruption should occur when both parasitoids are equally efficient and suggest that an autoparasitoid may be as efficient as a primary parasitoid in suppressing host densities.",
keywords = "Bemisia argentifolii, Bemisia tabaci, Biological control, Encarsia sophia, Eretmocerus eremicus, Exotic species, Heteronomous hyperparasitoid, Interference competition, Interspecific competition, Intraguild predation, Population regulation, Sweetpotato whitefly",
author = "Hunter, {Martha S} and Collier, {Timothy R.} and Kelly, {Suzanne E.}",
year = "2002",
month = "5",
day = "1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "83",
pages = "1459--1469",
journal = "Ecology",
issn = "0012-9658",
publisher = "Ecological Society of America",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Does an autoparasitoid disrupt host suppression provided by a primary parasitoid?

AU - Hunter, Martha S

AU - Collier, Timothy R.

AU - Kelly, Suzanne E.

PY - 2002/5/1

Y1 - 2002/5/1

N2 - Theory predicts that intraguild consumers such as predators or parasitoids may displace more specialized heterospecific competitors and thereby actually increase the population densities of a shared host or prey. We tested this idea with a native primary parasitoid, Eretmocerus eremicus, and an exotic autoparasitoid Encarsia sophia, both attacking the sweetpotato whitefly Bemisia tabaci. Autoparasitoids are intraguild consumers that attack and kill both the immature stages of hemipteran hosts, such as whiteflies, and heterospecific and conspecific parasitoids. In population cages on cotton plants in the field in 1997 and 1998, we introduced whiteflies and then parasitoids in a replacement design with constant total numbers of parasitoids, as follows: (1) control (whiteflies only), (2) E. eremicus only, (3) E. sophia only, and (4) both E. eremicus and E. sophia. Destructive samples of plants were taken 2, 4, and 6 wk after wasp releases, and immature whitefly and wasp stages were censused. In 1997, there were no significant differences in whitefly densities among treatments. In 1998, the control treatment densities were significantly greater than parasitoid treatments, but there was no difference among the parasitoid treatments, indicating equivalent suppression of whitefly populations by the two parasitoid species. In both years, similar patterns in parasitoid dynamics were observed. Densities of E. eremicus were significantly higher in the absence of E. sophia. In contrast, E. sophia densities were unaffected by the presence of E. eremicus. The results suggest that interference by the autoparasitoid reduced primary parasitoid density, but with no concommitant disruption of host suppression. The results support theoretical predictions that no disruption should occur when both parasitoids are equally efficient and suggest that an autoparasitoid may be as efficient as a primary parasitoid in suppressing host densities.

AB - Theory predicts that intraguild consumers such as predators or parasitoids may displace more specialized heterospecific competitors and thereby actually increase the population densities of a shared host or prey. We tested this idea with a native primary parasitoid, Eretmocerus eremicus, and an exotic autoparasitoid Encarsia sophia, both attacking the sweetpotato whitefly Bemisia tabaci. Autoparasitoids are intraguild consumers that attack and kill both the immature stages of hemipteran hosts, such as whiteflies, and heterospecific and conspecific parasitoids. In population cages on cotton plants in the field in 1997 and 1998, we introduced whiteflies and then parasitoids in a replacement design with constant total numbers of parasitoids, as follows: (1) control (whiteflies only), (2) E. eremicus only, (3) E. sophia only, and (4) both E. eremicus and E. sophia. Destructive samples of plants were taken 2, 4, and 6 wk after wasp releases, and immature whitefly and wasp stages were censused. In 1997, there were no significant differences in whitefly densities among treatments. In 1998, the control treatment densities were significantly greater than parasitoid treatments, but there was no difference among the parasitoid treatments, indicating equivalent suppression of whitefly populations by the two parasitoid species. In both years, similar patterns in parasitoid dynamics were observed. Densities of E. eremicus were significantly higher in the absence of E. sophia. In contrast, E. sophia densities were unaffected by the presence of E. eremicus. The results suggest that interference by the autoparasitoid reduced primary parasitoid density, but with no concommitant disruption of host suppression. The results support theoretical predictions that no disruption should occur when both parasitoids are equally efficient and suggest that an autoparasitoid may be as efficient as a primary parasitoid in suppressing host densities.

KW - Bemisia argentifolii

KW - Bemisia tabaci

KW - Biological control

KW - Encarsia sophia

KW - Eretmocerus eremicus

KW - Exotic species

KW - Heteronomous hyperparasitoid

KW - Interference competition

KW - Interspecific competition

KW - Intraguild predation

KW - Population regulation

KW - Sweetpotato whitefly

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0003285155&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0003285155&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0003285155

VL - 83

SP - 1459

EP - 1469

JO - Ecology

JF - Ecology

SN - 0012-9658

IS - 5

ER -