Does feedback matter for job search self-regulation? It depends on feedback quality

Nitya Chawla, Allison S. Gabriel, Serge P. da Motta Veiga, Jerel E Slaughter

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Job search represents a dynamic process through which job seekers must consistently engage in effective self-regulation. Although scholars have increasingly begun to theorize and conceptualize the job search in this manner, little is known about what fosters effective self-regulation week-to-week. In light of this theoretical gap, we integrate self-regulation theory with the feedback literature to examine how feedback quality influences affective, cognitive, and behavioral regulatory processes in job search. Furthermore, we examine feedback self-efficacy (i.e., how efficacious a job seeker feels with respect to processing and implementing feedback received during the job search) as a stable, person-level moderator of these within-person relationships. In a sample of job seekers surveyed once a week for seven weeks, results indicate that receiving high-quality feedback has a direct influence on positive and negative affective reactions tied to the job search, influencing subsequent positive (i.e., metacognitive strategies) and negative (i.e., affective rumination) cognitive processes. Metacognitive strategies, in turn, impact both the number of résumés sent and hours spent job seeking each week. Moreover, lower feedback self-efficacy amplifies the relationship between feedback quality and negative affective reactions. Our results highlight the importance of high-quality feedback in helping job seekers effectively regulate week-to-week.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalPersonnel Psychology
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2019

Fingerprint

Self Efficacy
Self-regulation
Job search
Self-Control
Job seeker
Affective reactions
Self-efficacy
Dynamic process
Regulation theory
Moderator
Cognitive processes

Keywords

  • feedback
  • job search
  • self-efficacy
  • self-regulation
  • weekly study

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Applied Psychology
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

Cite this

Does feedback matter for job search self-regulation? It depends on feedback quality. / Chawla, Nitya; Gabriel, Allison S.; da Motta Veiga, Serge P.; Slaughter, Jerel E.

In: Personnel Psychology, 01.01.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{2d7f428a87134b21b3003a9388a77a23,
title = "Does feedback matter for job search self-regulation? It depends on feedback quality",
abstract = "Job search represents a dynamic process through which job seekers must consistently engage in effective self-regulation. Although scholars have increasingly begun to theorize and conceptualize the job search in this manner, little is known about what fosters effective self-regulation week-to-week. In light of this theoretical gap, we integrate self-regulation theory with the feedback literature to examine how feedback quality influences affective, cognitive, and behavioral regulatory processes in job search. Furthermore, we examine feedback self-efficacy (i.e., how efficacious a job seeker feels with respect to processing and implementing feedback received during the job search) as a stable, person-level moderator of these within-person relationships. In a sample of job seekers surveyed once a week for seven weeks, results indicate that receiving high-quality feedback has a direct influence on positive and negative affective reactions tied to the job search, influencing subsequent positive (i.e., metacognitive strategies) and negative (i.e., affective rumination) cognitive processes. Metacognitive strategies, in turn, impact both the number of r{\'e}sum{\'e}s sent and hours spent job seeking each week. Moreover, lower feedback self-efficacy amplifies the relationship between feedback quality and negative affective reactions. Our results highlight the importance of high-quality feedback in helping job seekers effectively regulate week-to-week.",
keywords = "feedback, job search, self-efficacy, self-regulation, weekly study",
author = "Nitya Chawla and Gabriel, {Allison S.} and {da Motta Veiga}, {Serge P.} and Slaughter, {Jerel E}",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/peps.12320",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Personnel Psychology",
issn = "0031-5826",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Does feedback matter for job search self-regulation? It depends on feedback quality

AU - Chawla, Nitya

AU - Gabriel, Allison S.

AU - da Motta Veiga, Serge P.

AU - Slaughter, Jerel E

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - Job search represents a dynamic process through which job seekers must consistently engage in effective self-regulation. Although scholars have increasingly begun to theorize and conceptualize the job search in this manner, little is known about what fosters effective self-regulation week-to-week. In light of this theoretical gap, we integrate self-regulation theory with the feedback literature to examine how feedback quality influences affective, cognitive, and behavioral regulatory processes in job search. Furthermore, we examine feedback self-efficacy (i.e., how efficacious a job seeker feels with respect to processing and implementing feedback received during the job search) as a stable, person-level moderator of these within-person relationships. In a sample of job seekers surveyed once a week for seven weeks, results indicate that receiving high-quality feedback has a direct influence on positive and negative affective reactions tied to the job search, influencing subsequent positive (i.e., metacognitive strategies) and negative (i.e., affective rumination) cognitive processes. Metacognitive strategies, in turn, impact both the number of résumés sent and hours spent job seeking each week. Moreover, lower feedback self-efficacy amplifies the relationship between feedback quality and negative affective reactions. Our results highlight the importance of high-quality feedback in helping job seekers effectively regulate week-to-week.

AB - Job search represents a dynamic process through which job seekers must consistently engage in effective self-regulation. Although scholars have increasingly begun to theorize and conceptualize the job search in this manner, little is known about what fosters effective self-regulation week-to-week. In light of this theoretical gap, we integrate self-regulation theory with the feedback literature to examine how feedback quality influences affective, cognitive, and behavioral regulatory processes in job search. Furthermore, we examine feedback self-efficacy (i.e., how efficacious a job seeker feels with respect to processing and implementing feedback received during the job search) as a stable, person-level moderator of these within-person relationships. In a sample of job seekers surveyed once a week for seven weeks, results indicate that receiving high-quality feedback has a direct influence on positive and negative affective reactions tied to the job search, influencing subsequent positive (i.e., metacognitive strategies) and negative (i.e., affective rumination) cognitive processes. Metacognitive strategies, in turn, impact both the number of résumés sent and hours spent job seeking each week. Moreover, lower feedback self-efficacy amplifies the relationship between feedback quality and negative affective reactions. Our results highlight the importance of high-quality feedback in helping job seekers effectively regulate week-to-week.

KW - feedback

KW - job search

KW - self-efficacy

KW - self-regulation

KW - weekly study

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85063080747&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85063080747&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/peps.12320

DO - 10.1111/peps.12320

M3 - Article

JO - Personnel Psychology

JF - Personnel Psychology

SN - 0031-5826

ER -