Does Orientation-Independent Object Recognition Precede Orientation-Dependent Recognition? Evidence From a Cuing Paradigm

Bradley S. Gibson, Mary A Peterson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

50 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Object recognition may entail an incremental normalization process before access to canonical orientation representations, but is this process guided by prior access to object-centered representations? In Experiment 1, the authors showed observers figure-ground stimuli known to reflect access to, and output from, stored shape representations. The stimuli appeared in each of 6 different orientations, preceded by cues providing either (a) no information, (b) upright shape information only, (c) upright shape information plus orientation information (separately), or (d) shape information in the same orientation as the upcoming figure-ground test stimulus. Contrary to predictions by a postaccess account, the cues failed to eliminate orientation dependency in shape recognition. The results favor a preaccess account of the normalization process within the context of canonical orientation representations.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)299-316
Number of pages18
JournalJournal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance
Volume20
Issue number2
StatePublished - Apr 1994

Fingerprint

Cues
Recognition (Psychology)
Paradigm
Object Recognition
Stimulus
Dependency (Psychology)
Normalization

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Behavioral Neuroscience
  • Cognitive Neuroscience

Cite this

@article{7d07acd040124a62a12498661b6cd302,
title = "Does Orientation-Independent Object Recognition Precede Orientation-Dependent Recognition? Evidence From a Cuing Paradigm",
abstract = "Object recognition may entail an incremental normalization process before access to canonical orientation representations, but is this process guided by prior access to object-centered representations? In Experiment 1, the authors showed observers figure-ground stimuli known to reflect access to, and output from, stored shape representations. The stimuli appeared in each of 6 different orientations, preceded by cues providing either (a) no information, (b) upright shape information only, (c) upright shape information plus orientation information (separately), or (d) shape information in the same orientation as the upcoming figure-ground test stimulus. Contrary to predictions by a postaccess account, the cues failed to eliminate orientation dependency in shape recognition. The results favor a preaccess account of the normalization process within the context of canonical orientation representations.",
author = "Gibson, {Bradley S.} and Peterson, {Mary A}",
year = "1994",
month = "4",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "20",
pages = "299--316",
journal = "Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance",
issn = "0096-1523",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Does Orientation-Independent Object Recognition Precede Orientation-Dependent Recognition? Evidence From a Cuing Paradigm

AU - Gibson, Bradley S.

AU - Peterson, Mary A

PY - 1994/4

Y1 - 1994/4

N2 - Object recognition may entail an incremental normalization process before access to canonical orientation representations, but is this process guided by prior access to object-centered representations? In Experiment 1, the authors showed observers figure-ground stimuli known to reflect access to, and output from, stored shape representations. The stimuli appeared in each of 6 different orientations, preceded by cues providing either (a) no information, (b) upright shape information only, (c) upright shape information plus orientation information (separately), or (d) shape information in the same orientation as the upcoming figure-ground test stimulus. Contrary to predictions by a postaccess account, the cues failed to eliminate orientation dependency in shape recognition. The results favor a preaccess account of the normalization process within the context of canonical orientation representations.

AB - Object recognition may entail an incremental normalization process before access to canonical orientation representations, but is this process guided by prior access to object-centered representations? In Experiment 1, the authors showed observers figure-ground stimuli known to reflect access to, and output from, stored shape representations. The stimuli appeared in each of 6 different orientations, preceded by cues providing either (a) no information, (b) upright shape information only, (c) upright shape information plus orientation information (separately), or (d) shape information in the same orientation as the upcoming figure-ground test stimulus. Contrary to predictions by a postaccess account, the cues failed to eliminate orientation dependency in shape recognition. The results favor a preaccess account of the normalization process within the context of canonical orientation representations.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0028411724&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0028411724&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 8189194

AN - SCOPUS:0028411724

VL - 20

SP - 299

EP - 316

JO - Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance

JF - Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance

SN - 0096-1523

IS - 2

ER -