Does suppressing negative emotion impair subsequent emotions? Two experience sampling studies

Yan Ruan, Harry T. Reis, Wojciech Zareba, Richard D Lane

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Suppression is one of the most commonly studied emotion-regulation strategies and a variety of studies have shown that suppression of emotions is associated with adverse affective outcomes. Most of the evidence for this conclusion comes from laboratory manipulations in which people enact experimentally induced suppression or from survey-based recollections. In the present pair of studies (468 participants total), we used real-time experience sampling data to examine the effect of naturally occurring suppression of negative emotion at one moment on subsequent reports of both negative and positive emotion. Results demonstrated that suppression led to later increases in both high-activation and low-activation negative emotions, over and above the level of negative emotion being suppressed. These findings add ecologically valid support to the growing body of evidence showing that emotional suppression is not only an ineffective emotion-regulation strategy, but also a costly one.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalMotivation and Emotion
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2019

Fingerprint

Sampling Studies
Emotions
Ecological Momentary Assessment

Keywords

  • Emotion regulation
  • Emotion suppression
  • Experience sampling
  • Negative affect

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Psychology
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

Cite this

Does suppressing negative emotion impair subsequent emotions? Two experience sampling studies. / Ruan, Yan; Reis, Harry T.; Zareba, Wojciech; Lane, Richard D.

In: Motivation and Emotion, 01.01.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{ee46b5c31fc94ad381b29b830161bd78,
title = "Does suppressing negative emotion impair subsequent emotions? Two experience sampling studies",
abstract = "Suppression is one of the most commonly studied emotion-regulation strategies and a variety of studies have shown that suppression of emotions is associated with adverse affective outcomes. Most of the evidence for this conclusion comes from laboratory manipulations in which people enact experimentally induced suppression or from survey-based recollections. In the present pair of studies (468 participants total), we used real-time experience sampling data to examine the effect of naturally occurring suppression of negative emotion at one moment on subsequent reports of both negative and positive emotion. Results demonstrated that suppression led to later increases in both high-activation and low-activation negative emotions, over and above the level of negative emotion being suppressed. These findings add ecologically valid support to the growing body of evidence showing that emotional suppression is not only an ineffective emotion-regulation strategy, but also a costly one.",
keywords = "Emotion regulation, Emotion suppression, Experience sampling, Negative affect",
author = "Yan Ruan and Reis, {Harry T.} and Wojciech Zareba and Lane, {Richard D}",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s11031-019-09774-w",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Motivation and Emotion",
issn = "0146-7239",
publisher = "Springer New York",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Does suppressing negative emotion impair subsequent emotions? Two experience sampling studies

AU - Ruan, Yan

AU - Reis, Harry T.

AU - Zareba, Wojciech

AU - Lane, Richard D

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - Suppression is one of the most commonly studied emotion-regulation strategies and a variety of studies have shown that suppression of emotions is associated with adverse affective outcomes. Most of the evidence for this conclusion comes from laboratory manipulations in which people enact experimentally induced suppression or from survey-based recollections. In the present pair of studies (468 participants total), we used real-time experience sampling data to examine the effect of naturally occurring suppression of negative emotion at one moment on subsequent reports of both negative and positive emotion. Results demonstrated that suppression led to later increases in both high-activation and low-activation negative emotions, over and above the level of negative emotion being suppressed. These findings add ecologically valid support to the growing body of evidence showing that emotional suppression is not only an ineffective emotion-regulation strategy, but also a costly one.

AB - Suppression is one of the most commonly studied emotion-regulation strategies and a variety of studies have shown that suppression of emotions is associated with adverse affective outcomes. Most of the evidence for this conclusion comes from laboratory manipulations in which people enact experimentally induced suppression or from survey-based recollections. In the present pair of studies (468 participants total), we used real-time experience sampling data to examine the effect of naturally occurring suppression of negative emotion at one moment on subsequent reports of both negative and positive emotion. Results demonstrated that suppression led to later increases in both high-activation and low-activation negative emotions, over and above the level of negative emotion being suppressed. These findings add ecologically valid support to the growing body of evidence showing that emotional suppression is not only an ineffective emotion-regulation strategy, but also a costly one.

KW - Emotion regulation

KW - Emotion suppression

KW - Experience sampling

KW - Negative affect

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85068061274&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85068061274&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s11031-019-09774-w

DO - 10.1007/s11031-019-09774-w

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85068061274

JO - Motivation and Emotion

JF - Motivation and Emotion

SN - 0146-7239

ER -