Domestic calf mortality and producer detection rates in the Mexican wolf recovery area

Implications for livestock management and carnivore compensation schemes

Stewart W. Breck, Bryan M. Kluever, Michael Panasci, John Oakleaf, Terry Johnson, Warren Ballard, Larry D Howery, David L. Bergman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

16 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Conserving large carnivores throughout the world will often require that they share the landscape with livestock. Minimizing depredations and increasing tolerance by livestock producers will be critical for conservation efforts. To investigate factors influencing calf mortality and producer detection rates (i.e., number of livestock killed by predators, found by producers, and correctly classified as to cause of death), we monitored radio-tagged domestic calves at two sites in the Mexican wolf recovery area (East Eagle [EE] and Adobe Ranch [AR]). Study areas differed in grazing practices, density of predators (mountain lions, black bears, coyotes, and Mexican wolves), and amount of effort spent monitoring cattle. We radiotagged 618 calves over 3.5. years, and 312 calves over 2 years on the EE and AR, respectively. The overall proportion of radioed calves that died was higher on the EE (6.5%) than on the AR (1.9%). Predators (especially mountain lions) accounted for 85% of mortality on the EE and 0% on the AR. Calves selected by predators were on average 25 days younger than the surviving cohort. Our results indicate that year-round calving, especially in areas with high predator densities, are subject to higher losses primarily because calves are exposed to mortality agents for longer periods of time rather than having higher natural rates of mortality. We found a significant difference in producer detection rates between study sites, likely due to differences in the intensity of monitoring cattle between sites. On the EE, the producer detected 77.5% of mortalities and on the AR, the producer detected 33% of mortalities. Our results support changing husbandry practices to limit calving to a seasonal endeavor and that performance payment may be a better compensation strategy than ex post compensation schemes.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)930-936
Number of pages7
JournalBiological Conservation
Volume144
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 2011

Fingerprint

livestock farming
wolves
carnivore
carnivores
ranching
livestock
eagles
calves
mortality
predator
predators
Puma concolor
cattle
calving
mountain
cause of death
radio frequency identification
monitoring
Canis latrans
rate

Keywords

  • Compensation schemes
  • Livestock
  • Mortality
  • Predator
  • Producer detection rate
  • Survival

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation

Cite this

Domestic calf mortality and producer detection rates in the Mexican wolf recovery area : Implications for livestock management and carnivore compensation schemes. / Breck, Stewart W.; Kluever, Bryan M.; Panasci, Michael; Oakleaf, John; Johnson, Terry; Ballard, Warren; Howery, Larry D; Bergman, David L.

In: Biological Conservation, Vol. 144, No. 2, 02.2011, p. 930-936.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Breck, Stewart W. ; Kluever, Bryan M. ; Panasci, Michael ; Oakleaf, John ; Johnson, Terry ; Ballard, Warren ; Howery, Larry D ; Bergman, David L. / Domestic calf mortality and producer detection rates in the Mexican wolf recovery area : Implications for livestock management and carnivore compensation schemes. In: Biological Conservation. 2011 ; Vol. 144, No. 2. pp. 930-936.
@article{e99726d196484e2fba1265fd8bf038c3,
title = "Domestic calf mortality and producer detection rates in the Mexican wolf recovery area: Implications for livestock management and carnivore compensation schemes",
abstract = "Conserving large carnivores throughout the world will often require that they share the landscape with livestock. Minimizing depredations and increasing tolerance by livestock producers will be critical for conservation efforts. To investigate factors influencing calf mortality and producer detection rates (i.e., number of livestock killed by predators, found by producers, and correctly classified as to cause of death), we monitored radio-tagged domestic calves at two sites in the Mexican wolf recovery area (East Eagle [EE] and Adobe Ranch [AR]). Study areas differed in grazing practices, density of predators (mountain lions, black bears, coyotes, and Mexican wolves), and amount of effort spent monitoring cattle. We radiotagged 618 calves over 3.5. years, and 312 calves over 2 years on the EE and AR, respectively. The overall proportion of radioed calves that died was higher on the EE (6.5{\%}) than on the AR (1.9{\%}). Predators (especially mountain lions) accounted for 85{\%} of mortality on the EE and 0{\%} on the AR. Calves selected by predators were on average 25 days younger than the surviving cohort. Our results indicate that year-round calving, especially in areas with high predator densities, are subject to higher losses primarily because calves are exposed to mortality agents for longer periods of time rather than having higher natural rates of mortality. We found a significant difference in producer detection rates between study sites, likely due to differences in the intensity of monitoring cattle between sites. On the EE, the producer detected 77.5{\%} of mortalities and on the AR, the producer detected 33{\%} of mortalities. Our results support changing husbandry practices to limit calving to a seasonal endeavor and that performance payment may be a better compensation strategy than ex post compensation schemes.",
keywords = "Compensation schemes, Livestock, Mortality, Predator, Producer detection rate, Survival",
author = "Breck, {Stewart W.} and Kluever, {Bryan M.} and Michael Panasci and John Oakleaf and Terry Johnson and Warren Ballard and Howery, {Larry D} and Bergman, {David L.}",
year = "2011",
month = "2",
doi = "10.1016/j.biocon.2010.12.014",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "144",
pages = "930--936",
journal = "Biological Conservation",
issn = "0006-3207",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Domestic calf mortality and producer detection rates in the Mexican wolf recovery area

T2 - Implications for livestock management and carnivore compensation schemes

AU - Breck, Stewart W.

AU - Kluever, Bryan M.

AU - Panasci, Michael

AU - Oakleaf, John

AU - Johnson, Terry

AU - Ballard, Warren

AU - Howery, Larry D

AU - Bergman, David L.

PY - 2011/2

Y1 - 2011/2

N2 - Conserving large carnivores throughout the world will often require that they share the landscape with livestock. Minimizing depredations and increasing tolerance by livestock producers will be critical for conservation efforts. To investigate factors influencing calf mortality and producer detection rates (i.e., number of livestock killed by predators, found by producers, and correctly classified as to cause of death), we monitored radio-tagged domestic calves at two sites in the Mexican wolf recovery area (East Eagle [EE] and Adobe Ranch [AR]). Study areas differed in grazing practices, density of predators (mountain lions, black bears, coyotes, and Mexican wolves), and amount of effort spent monitoring cattle. We radiotagged 618 calves over 3.5. years, and 312 calves over 2 years on the EE and AR, respectively. The overall proportion of radioed calves that died was higher on the EE (6.5%) than on the AR (1.9%). Predators (especially mountain lions) accounted for 85% of mortality on the EE and 0% on the AR. Calves selected by predators were on average 25 days younger than the surviving cohort. Our results indicate that year-round calving, especially in areas with high predator densities, are subject to higher losses primarily because calves are exposed to mortality agents for longer periods of time rather than having higher natural rates of mortality. We found a significant difference in producer detection rates between study sites, likely due to differences in the intensity of monitoring cattle between sites. On the EE, the producer detected 77.5% of mortalities and on the AR, the producer detected 33% of mortalities. Our results support changing husbandry practices to limit calving to a seasonal endeavor and that performance payment may be a better compensation strategy than ex post compensation schemes.

AB - Conserving large carnivores throughout the world will often require that they share the landscape with livestock. Minimizing depredations and increasing tolerance by livestock producers will be critical for conservation efforts. To investigate factors influencing calf mortality and producer detection rates (i.e., number of livestock killed by predators, found by producers, and correctly classified as to cause of death), we monitored radio-tagged domestic calves at two sites in the Mexican wolf recovery area (East Eagle [EE] and Adobe Ranch [AR]). Study areas differed in grazing practices, density of predators (mountain lions, black bears, coyotes, and Mexican wolves), and amount of effort spent monitoring cattle. We radiotagged 618 calves over 3.5. years, and 312 calves over 2 years on the EE and AR, respectively. The overall proportion of radioed calves that died was higher on the EE (6.5%) than on the AR (1.9%). Predators (especially mountain lions) accounted for 85% of mortality on the EE and 0% on the AR. Calves selected by predators were on average 25 days younger than the surviving cohort. Our results indicate that year-round calving, especially in areas with high predator densities, are subject to higher losses primarily because calves are exposed to mortality agents for longer periods of time rather than having higher natural rates of mortality. We found a significant difference in producer detection rates between study sites, likely due to differences in the intensity of monitoring cattle between sites. On the EE, the producer detected 77.5% of mortalities and on the AR, the producer detected 33% of mortalities. Our results support changing husbandry practices to limit calving to a seasonal endeavor and that performance payment may be a better compensation strategy than ex post compensation schemes.

KW - Compensation schemes

KW - Livestock

KW - Mortality

KW - Predator

KW - Producer detection rate

KW - Survival

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79451469962&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79451469962&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.biocon.2010.12.014

DO - 10.1016/j.biocon.2010.12.014

M3 - Article

VL - 144

SP - 930

EP - 936

JO - Biological Conservation

JF - Biological Conservation

SN - 0006-3207

IS - 2

ER -