Drought and declining reservoirs: Comparing media discourse in Arizona and New Mexico, 2002-2004

John Sonnett, Barbara J. Morehouse, Thomas D. Finger, Gregg Garfin, Nicholas Rattray

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

27 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Media discourses about drought impacts on lakes and reservoirs in Arizona and New Mexico between 2002 and 2004 are compared to show how discursive contexts shape the framing of drought in temporal and spatial scales. Discursive contexts in the two states are shaped by their cultural and political histories and the differential development of water delivery infrastructures. Quantitative mapping of keywords in the states' main newspapers shows how New Mexico experienced more conflict and Arizona more surprise about the drought. Qualitative case studies link these patterns to variation in framing between the states. In particular, the shorter temporal scale in New Mexico is linked to a greater sense of emergency, while the longer temporal scale in Arizona reflects the buffering of urban populations from drought through water delivery infrastructure. The finer spatial scale in Arizona, focusing on urban concerns, reflects an established infrastructure of reservoirs while the broader spatial scale in New Mexico, incorporating both rural and urban concerns, reflects a less developed physical infrastructure and greater prevalence of water rights conflicts. This study illustrates the usefulness of a multifaceted approach to the study of media discourse.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)95-113
Number of pages19
JournalGlobal Environmental Change
Volume16
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 2006

Fingerprint

drought
Mexico
infrastructure
discourse
water
cultural history
political history
urban population
buffering
newspaper
lake
conflict

Keywords

  • Content analysis
  • Discourse
  • Drought
  • Framing
  • Newspapers
  • Temporal and spatial scales

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Environmental Science(all)
  • Global and Planetary Change
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

Cite this

Drought and declining reservoirs : Comparing media discourse in Arizona and New Mexico, 2002-2004. / Sonnett, John; Morehouse, Barbara J.; Finger, Thomas D.; Garfin, Gregg; Rattray, Nicholas.

In: Global Environmental Change, Vol. 16, No. 1, 02.2006, p. 95-113.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Sonnett, John ; Morehouse, Barbara J. ; Finger, Thomas D. ; Garfin, Gregg ; Rattray, Nicholas. / Drought and declining reservoirs : Comparing media discourse in Arizona and New Mexico, 2002-2004. In: Global Environmental Change. 2006 ; Vol. 16, No. 1. pp. 95-113.
@article{5bafd25eb4124f90865d6b9a75d10db7,
title = "Drought and declining reservoirs: Comparing media discourse in Arizona and New Mexico, 2002-2004",
abstract = "Media discourses about drought impacts on lakes and reservoirs in Arizona and New Mexico between 2002 and 2004 are compared to show how discursive contexts shape the framing of drought in temporal and spatial scales. Discursive contexts in the two states are shaped by their cultural and political histories and the differential development of water delivery infrastructures. Quantitative mapping of keywords in the states' main newspapers shows how New Mexico experienced more conflict and Arizona more surprise about the drought. Qualitative case studies link these patterns to variation in framing between the states. In particular, the shorter temporal scale in New Mexico is linked to a greater sense of emergency, while the longer temporal scale in Arizona reflects the buffering of urban populations from drought through water delivery infrastructure. The finer spatial scale in Arizona, focusing on urban concerns, reflects an established infrastructure of reservoirs while the broader spatial scale in New Mexico, incorporating both rural and urban concerns, reflects a less developed physical infrastructure and greater prevalence of water rights conflicts. This study illustrates the usefulness of a multifaceted approach to the study of media discourse.",
keywords = "Content analysis, Discourse, Drought, Framing, Newspapers, Temporal and spatial scales",
author = "John Sonnett and Morehouse, {Barbara J.} and Finger, {Thomas D.} and Gregg Garfin and Nicholas Rattray",
year = "2006",
month = "2",
doi = "10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2005.11.004",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "16",
pages = "95--113",
journal = "Global Environmental Change",
issn = "0959-3780",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Drought and declining reservoirs

T2 - Comparing media discourse in Arizona and New Mexico, 2002-2004

AU - Sonnett, John

AU - Morehouse, Barbara J.

AU - Finger, Thomas D.

AU - Garfin, Gregg

AU - Rattray, Nicholas

PY - 2006/2

Y1 - 2006/2

N2 - Media discourses about drought impacts on lakes and reservoirs in Arizona and New Mexico between 2002 and 2004 are compared to show how discursive contexts shape the framing of drought in temporal and spatial scales. Discursive contexts in the two states are shaped by their cultural and political histories and the differential development of water delivery infrastructures. Quantitative mapping of keywords in the states' main newspapers shows how New Mexico experienced more conflict and Arizona more surprise about the drought. Qualitative case studies link these patterns to variation in framing between the states. In particular, the shorter temporal scale in New Mexico is linked to a greater sense of emergency, while the longer temporal scale in Arizona reflects the buffering of urban populations from drought through water delivery infrastructure. The finer spatial scale in Arizona, focusing on urban concerns, reflects an established infrastructure of reservoirs while the broader spatial scale in New Mexico, incorporating both rural and urban concerns, reflects a less developed physical infrastructure and greater prevalence of water rights conflicts. This study illustrates the usefulness of a multifaceted approach to the study of media discourse.

AB - Media discourses about drought impacts on lakes and reservoirs in Arizona and New Mexico between 2002 and 2004 are compared to show how discursive contexts shape the framing of drought in temporal and spatial scales. Discursive contexts in the two states are shaped by their cultural and political histories and the differential development of water delivery infrastructures. Quantitative mapping of keywords in the states' main newspapers shows how New Mexico experienced more conflict and Arizona more surprise about the drought. Qualitative case studies link these patterns to variation in framing between the states. In particular, the shorter temporal scale in New Mexico is linked to a greater sense of emergency, while the longer temporal scale in Arizona reflects the buffering of urban populations from drought through water delivery infrastructure. The finer spatial scale in Arizona, focusing on urban concerns, reflects an established infrastructure of reservoirs while the broader spatial scale in New Mexico, incorporating both rural and urban concerns, reflects a less developed physical infrastructure and greater prevalence of water rights conflicts. This study illustrates the usefulness of a multifaceted approach to the study of media discourse.

KW - Content analysis

KW - Discourse

KW - Drought

KW - Framing

KW - Newspapers

KW - Temporal and spatial scales

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=31844448266&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=31844448266&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2005.11.004

DO - 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2005.11.004

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:31844448266

VL - 16

SP - 95

EP - 113

JO - Global Environmental Change

JF - Global Environmental Change

SN - 0959-3780

IS - 1

ER -