Dynamic stall control by periodic excitation, Part 2: Mechanisms

D. Greenblatt, B. Nishri, A. Darabi, Israel J Wygnanski

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

61 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Dynamic flow separation and its control over a stationary deflected surface are used to demonstrate the timescale disparity between the process of dynamic stall, which is dominated by the dynamic stall vortex (DSV), and the excitation-induced large coherent structures that effect its control. Appreciation of this disparity provided a framework for analyzing dynamic stall control on a NACA 0015 airfoil, where leading-edge excitation had effectively eliminated the DSV and significantly attenuated trailing-edge separation. Within this framework, a comparison of static and airfoil phase-locked dynamic pressure data acquired in the vicinity of maximum incidence (α ≈ 25 deg) revealed that chordwise pressure distributions were independent of the airfoil pitching frequency and that the generation and advection of LCSs were not significantly affected by the dynamic airfoil pitching motion. Furthermore, disparities between static and dynamic data diminished as the excitation frequency increased relative to the airfoil pitching frequency. Oscillations of the aerodynamic coefficients induced by the excitations were negligibly small but served to regulate airfoil cycle-to-cycle disparities typical of the baseline poststall regime.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)439-447
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Aircraft
Volume38
Issue number3
StatePublished - May 2001
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Airfoils
Vortex flow
Flow separation
Advection
Pressure distribution
Aerodynamics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Aerospace Engineering

Cite this

Dynamic stall control by periodic excitation, Part 2 : Mechanisms. / Greenblatt, D.; Nishri, B.; Darabi, A.; Wygnanski, Israel J.

In: Journal of Aircraft, Vol. 38, No. 3, 05.2001, p. 439-447.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Greenblatt, D, Nishri, B, Darabi, A & Wygnanski, IJ 2001, 'Dynamic stall control by periodic excitation, Part 2: Mechanisms', Journal of Aircraft, vol. 38, no. 3, pp. 439-447.
Greenblatt, D. ; Nishri, B. ; Darabi, A. ; Wygnanski, Israel J. / Dynamic stall control by periodic excitation, Part 2 : Mechanisms. In: Journal of Aircraft. 2001 ; Vol. 38, No. 3. pp. 439-447.
@article{caeaec82da014beea00551193446bf3d,
title = "Dynamic stall control by periodic excitation, Part 2: Mechanisms",
abstract = "Dynamic flow separation and its control over a stationary deflected surface are used to demonstrate the timescale disparity between the process of dynamic stall, which is dominated by the dynamic stall vortex (DSV), and the excitation-induced large coherent structures that effect its control. Appreciation of this disparity provided a framework for analyzing dynamic stall control on a NACA 0015 airfoil, where leading-edge excitation had effectively eliminated the DSV and significantly attenuated trailing-edge separation. Within this framework, a comparison of static and airfoil phase-locked dynamic pressure data acquired in the vicinity of maximum incidence (α ≈ 25 deg) revealed that chordwise pressure distributions were independent of the airfoil pitching frequency and that the generation and advection of LCSs were not significantly affected by the dynamic airfoil pitching motion. Furthermore, disparities between static and dynamic data diminished as the excitation frequency increased relative to the airfoil pitching frequency. Oscillations of the aerodynamic coefficients induced by the excitations were negligibly small but served to regulate airfoil cycle-to-cycle disparities typical of the baseline poststall regime.",
author = "D. Greenblatt and B. Nishri and A. Darabi and Wygnanski, {Israel J}",
year = "2001",
month = "5",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "38",
pages = "439--447",
journal = "Journal of Aircraft",
issn = "0021-8669",
publisher = "American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics Inc. (AIAA)",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Dynamic stall control by periodic excitation, Part 2

T2 - Mechanisms

AU - Greenblatt, D.

AU - Nishri, B.

AU - Darabi, A.

AU - Wygnanski, Israel J

PY - 2001/5

Y1 - 2001/5

N2 - Dynamic flow separation and its control over a stationary deflected surface are used to demonstrate the timescale disparity between the process of dynamic stall, which is dominated by the dynamic stall vortex (DSV), and the excitation-induced large coherent structures that effect its control. Appreciation of this disparity provided a framework for analyzing dynamic stall control on a NACA 0015 airfoil, where leading-edge excitation had effectively eliminated the DSV and significantly attenuated trailing-edge separation. Within this framework, a comparison of static and airfoil phase-locked dynamic pressure data acquired in the vicinity of maximum incidence (α ≈ 25 deg) revealed that chordwise pressure distributions were independent of the airfoil pitching frequency and that the generation and advection of LCSs were not significantly affected by the dynamic airfoil pitching motion. Furthermore, disparities between static and dynamic data diminished as the excitation frequency increased relative to the airfoil pitching frequency. Oscillations of the aerodynamic coefficients induced by the excitations were negligibly small but served to regulate airfoil cycle-to-cycle disparities typical of the baseline poststall regime.

AB - Dynamic flow separation and its control over a stationary deflected surface are used to demonstrate the timescale disparity between the process of dynamic stall, which is dominated by the dynamic stall vortex (DSV), and the excitation-induced large coherent structures that effect its control. Appreciation of this disparity provided a framework for analyzing dynamic stall control on a NACA 0015 airfoil, where leading-edge excitation had effectively eliminated the DSV and significantly attenuated trailing-edge separation. Within this framework, a comparison of static and airfoil phase-locked dynamic pressure data acquired in the vicinity of maximum incidence (α ≈ 25 deg) revealed that chordwise pressure distributions were independent of the airfoil pitching frequency and that the generation and advection of LCSs were not significantly affected by the dynamic airfoil pitching motion. Furthermore, disparities between static and dynamic data diminished as the excitation frequency increased relative to the airfoil pitching frequency. Oscillations of the aerodynamic coefficients induced by the excitations were negligibly small but served to regulate airfoil cycle-to-cycle disparities typical of the baseline poststall regime.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0035335222&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0035335222&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0035335222

VL - 38

SP - 439

EP - 447

JO - Journal of Aircraft

JF - Journal of Aircraft

SN - 0021-8669

IS - 3

ER -