Ear and electrode effects reduce within-group variability in middle latency response amplitude measures

Jeffrey Weihing, Eliane Schochat, Frank Musiek

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives: To establish normative amplitude values for relative difference measurements of the middle latency response (MLR) in normal-hearing pediatrics and to determine if these measurements provided a significant reduction of within-group variability when compared to raw, absolute amplitude measures. A relative amplitude difference is defined in the present paper as the difference in Na-Pa amplitude between two electrodes (e.g. |Na-Pa at C3 minus Na-Pa at C4|, or electrode effects) or between two ears (e.g. |Na-Pa on left ear stimulation minus Na-Pa on right ear stimulation|, or ear effects). In contrast, an absolute amplitude is defined as a single Na-Pa measurement made at one electrode for stimulation of one ear (e.g. Na-Pa measured at C3 on left ear stimulation). Design: Cross-sectional study. Study sample: 155 pediatrics with normal peripheral and central hearing, and no history of psychological, neurological, or learning disability issues. Results: Within-group variability was significantly smaller for relative differences when compared to absolute amplitude measures. Electrode effects showed significantly less variability than ear effects. Normative values for ear and electrode effects were reported. Conclusions: Relative differences may provide better utility in the clinical diagnosis of central auditory pathology in pediatrics when compared to absolute amplitude measures because these difference measures show significantly lower variability when examined across subjects.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)405-412
Number of pages8
JournalInternational Journal of Audiology
Volume51
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - May 2012
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Reaction Time
Ear
Electrodes
Group
Pediatrics
Hearing
learning disability
cross-sectional study
pathology
Values
Latency
Learning Disorders
history
Cross-Sectional Studies
Pathology
Psychology
Stimulation

Keywords

  • Central auditory processing
  • Evoked potentials
  • Middle latency response
  • Variability

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Speech and Hearing
  • Language and Linguistics
  • Linguistics and Language

Cite this

Ear and electrode effects reduce within-group variability in middle latency response amplitude measures. / Weihing, Jeffrey; Schochat, Eliane; Musiek, Frank.

In: International Journal of Audiology, Vol. 51, No. 5, 05.2012, p. 405-412.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{7061149b32ea4a628755c73e28e26088,
title = "Ear and electrode effects reduce within-group variability in middle latency response amplitude measures",
abstract = "Objectives: To establish normative amplitude values for relative difference measurements of the middle latency response (MLR) in normal-hearing pediatrics and to determine if these measurements provided a significant reduction of within-group variability when compared to raw, absolute amplitude measures. A relative amplitude difference is defined in the present paper as the difference in Na-Pa amplitude between two electrodes (e.g. |Na-Pa at C3 minus Na-Pa at C4|, or electrode effects) or between two ears (e.g. |Na-Pa on left ear stimulation minus Na-Pa on right ear stimulation|, or ear effects). In contrast, an absolute amplitude is defined as a single Na-Pa measurement made at one electrode for stimulation of one ear (e.g. Na-Pa measured at C3 on left ear stimulation). Design: Cross-sectional study. Study sample: 155 pediatrics with normal peripheral and central hearing, and no history of psychological, neurological, or learning disability issues. Results: Within-group variability was significantly smaller for relative differences when compared to absolute amplitude measures. Electrode effects showed significantly less variability than ear effects. Normative values for ear and electrode effects were reported. Conclusions: Relative differences may provide better utility in the clinical diagnosis of central auditory pathology in pediatrics when compared to absolute amplitude measures because these difference measures show significantly lower variability when examined across subjects.",
keywords = "Central auditory processing, Evoked potentials, Middle latency response, Variability",
author = "Jeffrey Weihing and Eliane Schochat and Frank Musiek",
year = "2012",
month = "5",
doi = "10.3109/14992027.2012.658970",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "51",
pages = "405--412",
journal = "International Journal of Audiology",
issn = "1499-2027",
publisher = "Informa Healthcare",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Ear and electrode effects reduce within-group variability in middle latency response amplitude measures

AU - Weihing, Jeffrey

AU - Schochat, Eliane

AU - Musiek, Frank

PY - 2012/5

Y1 - 2012/5

N2 - Objectives: To establish normative amplitude values for relative difference measurements of the middle latency response (MLR) in normal-hearing pediatrics and to determine if these measurements provided a significant reduction of within-group variability when compared to raw, absolute amplitude measures. A relative amplitude difference is defined in the present paper as the difference in Na-Pa amplitude between two electrodes (e.g. |Na-Pa at C3 minus Na-Pa at C4|, or electrode effects) or between two ears (e.g. |Na-Pa on left ear stimulation minus Na-Pa on right ear stimulation|, or ear effects). In contrast, an absolute amplitude is defined as a single Na-Pa measurement made at one electrode for stimulation of one ear (e.g. Na-Pa measured at C3 on left ear stimulation). Design: Cross-sectional study. Study sample: 155 pediatrics with normal peripheral and central hearing, and no history of psychological, neurological, or learning disability issues. Results: Within-group variability was significantly smaller for relative differences when compared to absolute amplitude measures. Electrode effects showed significantly less variability than ear effects. Normative values for ear and electrode effects were reported. Conclusions: Relative differences may provide better utility in the clinical diagnosis of central auditory pathology in pediatrics when compared to absolute amplitude measures because these difference measures show significantly lower variability when examined across subjects.

AB - Objectives: To establish normative amplitude values for relative difference measurements of the middle latency response (MLR) in normal-hearing pediatrics and to determine if these measurements provided a significant reduction of within-group variability when compared to raw, absolute amplitude measures. A relative amplitude difference is defined in the present paper as the difference in Na-Pa amplitude between two electrodes (e.g. |Na-Pa at C3 minus Na-Pa at C4|, or electrode effects) or between two ears (e.g. |Na-Pa on left ear stimulation minus Na-Pa on right ear stimulation|, or ear effects). In contrast, an absolute amplitude is defined as a single Na-Pa measurement made at one electrode for stimulation of one ear (e.g. Na-Pa measured at C3 on left ear stimulation). Design: Cross-sectional study. Study sample: 155 pediatrics with normal peripheral and central hearing, and no history of psychological, neurological, or learning disability issues. Results: Within-group variability was significantly smaller for relative differences when compared to absolute amplitude measures. Electrode effects showed significantly less variability than ear effects. Normative values for ear and electrode effects were reported. Conclusions: Relative differences may provide better utility in the clinical diagnosis of central auditory pathology in pediatrics when compared to absolute amplitude measures because these difference measures show significantly lower variability when examined across subjects.

KW - Central auditory processing

KW - Evoked potentials

KW - Middle latency response

KW - Variability

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84859758945&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84859758945&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3109/14992027.2012.658970

DO - 10.3109/14992027.2012.658970

M3 - Article

VL - 51

SP - 405

EP - 412

JO - International Journal of Audiology

JF - International Journal of Audiology

SN - 1499-2027

IS - 5

ER -