Early career academic staff support: evaluating mentoring networks

J. Denard Thomas, Laura G Lunsford, Helena A. Rodrigues

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Which academics benefit from participation in formal mentoring programmes? This study examined the needs and mentoring networks of new academics with evaluative data from a pilot mentoring programme. Themes from these data point towards re-envisioning initiatives for academic staff development. First, an examination of the expansion of mentoring networks of new staff suggests that some need more support than others. Second, new academics have common needs in professional development support, despite disciplinary differences and the beliefs of many administrators. Third, evaluation of new academics’ self-reports show that there are differences in mentoring preferences that influence programme participation. Fourth, participant reports reveal both perceived benefits and some detriments of programme participation. Fifth, a somewhat widespread academic mentoring mindset was identified that may lead to problematic mentoring outcomes depending on demographic characteristics of protégés. Implications for administrators in charge of staff development and avenues for future research are presented.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)320-329
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Higher Education Policy and Management
Volume37
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - May 4 2015

Fingerprint

academic career
mentoring
staff
participation
examination
evaluation

Keywords

  • academic staff
  • faculty
  • higher education
  • mentoring
  • networks
  • professional development

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education
  • Public Administration

Cite this

Early career academic staff support : evaluating mentoring networks. / Denard Thomas, J.; Lunsford, Laura G; Rodrigues, Helena A.

In: Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, Vol. 37, No. 3, 04.05.2015, p. 320-329.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{164c8ed3d023445dbe62e7d7313bcbb5,
title = "Early career academic staff support: evaluating mentoring networks",
abstract = "Which academics benefit from participation in formal mentoring programmes? This study examined the needs and mentoring networks of new academics with evaluative data from a pilot mentoring programme. Themes from these data point towards re-envisioning initiatives for academic staff development. First, an examination of the expansion of mentoring networks of new staff suggests that some need more support than others. Second, new academics have common needs in professional development support, despite disciplinary differences and the beliefs of many administrators. Third, evaluation of new academics’ self-reports show that there are differences in mentoring preferences that influence programme participation. Fourth, participant reports reveal both perceived benefits and some detriments of programme participation. Fifth, a somewhat widespread academic mentoring mindset was identified that may lead to problematic mentoring outcomes depending on demographic characteristics of prot{\'e}g{\'e}s. Implications for administrators in charge of staff development and avenues for future research are presented.",
keywords = "academic staff, faculty, higher education, mentoring, networks, professional development",
author = "{Denard Thomas}, J. and Lunsford, {Laura G} and Rodrigues, {Helena A.}",
year = "2015",
month = "5",
day = "4",
doi = "10.1080/1360080X.2015.1034426",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "37",
pages = "320--329",
journal = "Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management",
issn = "1360-080X",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Early career academic staff support

T2 - evaluating mentoring networks

AU - Denard Thomas, J.

AU - Lunsford, Laura G

AU - Rodrigues, Helena A.

PY - 2015/5/4

Y1 - 2015/5/4

N2 - Which academics benefit from participation in formal mentoring programmes? This study examined the needs and mentoring networks of new academics with evaluative data from a pilot mentoring programme. Themes from these data point towards re-envisioning initiatives for academic staff development. First, an examination of the expansion of mentoring networks of new staff suggests that some need more support than others. Second, new academics have common needs in professional development support, despite disciplinary differences and the beliefs of many administrators. Third, evaluation of new academics’ self-reports show that there are differences in mentoring preferences that influence programme participation. Fourth, participant reports reveal both perceived benefits and some detriments of programme participation. Fifth, a somewhat widespread academic mentoring mindset was identified that may lead to problematic mentoring outcomes depending on demographic characteristics of protégés. Implications for administrators in charge of staff development and avenues for future research are presented.

AB - Which academics benefit from participation in formal mentoring programmes? This study examined the needs and mentoring networks of new academics with evaluative data from a pilot mentoring programme. Themes from these data point towards re-envisioning initiatives for academic staff development. First, an examination of the expansion of mentoring networks of new staff suggests that some need more support than others. Second, new academics have common needs in professional development support, despite disciplinary differences and the beliefs of many administrators. Third, evaluation of new academics’ self-reports show that there are differences in mentoring preferences that influence programme participation. Fourth, participant reports reveal both perceived benefits and some detriments of programme participation. Fifth, a somewhat widespread academic mentoring mindset was identified that may lead to problematic mentoring outcomes depending on demographic characteristics of protégés. Implications for administrators in charge of staff development and avenues for future research are presented.

KW - academic staff

KW - faculty

KW - higher education

KW - mentoring

KW - networks

KW - professional development

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84929948995&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84929948995&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/1360080X.2015.1034426

DO - 10.1080/1360080X.2015.1034426

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84929948995

VL - 37

SP - 320

EP - 329

JO - Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management

JF - Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management

SN - 1360-080X

IS - 3

ER -