“Eavesdropping on Happiness” Revisited: A Pooled, Multisample Replication of the Association Between Life Satisfaction and Observed Daily Conversation Quantity and Quality

Anne Milek, Emily A. Butler, Allison M. Tackman, Deanna M. Kaplan, Charles L. Raison, David A. Sbarra, Simine Vazire, Matthias R. Mehl

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

6 Scopus citations

Abstract

In the present study, we aimed to replicate and extend findings by Mehl, Vazire, Holleran, and Clark (2010) that individuals with higher well-being tend to spend less time alone and more time interacting with others (e.g., greater conversation quantity) and engage in less small talk and more substantive conversations (e.g., greater conversation quality). To test the robustness of these effects in a larger and more diverse sample, we used Bayesian integrative data analysis to pool data on subjective life satisfaction and observed daily conversations from three heterogeneous adult samples, in addition to the original sample (N = 486). We found moderate associations between life satisfaction and amount of alone time, conversation time, and substantive conversations, but no reliable association with small talk. Personality did not substantially moderate these associations. The failure to replicate the original small-talk effect is theoretically and practically important, as it has garnered considerable scientific and lay interest.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1451-1462
Number of pages12
JournalPsychological Science
Volume29
Issue number9
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2018

Keywords

  • Bayesian statistics
  • happiness
  • naturalistic observation
  • open data
  • open materials
  • replication
  • well-being

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychology(all)

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of '“Eavesdropping on Happiness” Revisited: A Pooled, Multisample Replication of the Association Between Life Satisfaction and Observed Daily Conversation Quantity and Quality'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this