Effect of clays, metal oxides, and organic matter on rhamnolipid biosurfactant sorption by soil

Francisco J. Ochoa-Loza, Wouter H. Noordman, Dick B. Jannsen, Mark L Brusseau, Raina Margaret Maier

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

50 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Rhamnolipids produced by Pseudomonas aeruginosa have been proposed as soil washing agents for enhanced removal of metal and organic contaminants from soil. A potential limitation for the application of rhamnolipids is sorption by soil matrix components. The objective of this study is to empirically determine the contribution of representative soil constituents (clays, metal oxides, and organic matter) to sorption of the rhamnolipid form most efficient at metal complexation (monorhamnolipid). Sorption studies show that monorhamnolipid (R1) sorption is concentration dependent. At low R1 concentrations that are relevant for enhancing organic contaminant biodegradation, R1 sorption followed the order: hematite (Fe2O3) > kaolinite > MnO2 ≈ illite ≈ Ca-montmorillonite > gibbsite (Al(OH)3) > humic acid-coated silica. At high R1 concentrations, relevant for use in complexation/removal of metals or organics, R1 sorption followed the order: illite >> humic acid-coated silica > Ca-montmorillonite > hematite > MnO2 > gibbsite ≈ kaolinite. These results allowed prediction of R1 sorption by a series of six soils. Finally, a comparison of R1 and R2 (dirhamnolipid) shows that the R1 form sorbs more strongly alone than when in a mixture of both the R1 and R2 forms. The information presented can be used to estimate, on an individual soil basis, the extent of rhamnolipid sorption. This is important for determining: (1) whether rhamnolipid addition is a feasible remediation option and (2) the amount of rhamnolipid required to efficiently remove the contaminant.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1634-1642
Number of pages9
JournalChemosphere
Volume66
Issue number9
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2007

Fingerprint

Biological materials
Oxides
Sorption
Clay
Soil
sorption
Metals
Soils
organic matter
clay
Bentonite
Kaolin
Humic Substances
soil
Silicon Dioxide
gibbsite
Kaolinite
Hematite
Impurities
Clay minerals

Keywords

  • Bioremediation
  • Biosurfactant
  • Remediation
  • Rhamnolipid
  • Soil washing
  • Sorption
  • Surfactant

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Environmental Chemistry
  • Environmental Science(all)

Cite this

Effect of clays, metal oxides, and organic matter on rhamnolipid biosurfactant sorption by soil. / Ochoa-Loza, Francisco J.; Noordman, Wouter H.; Jannsen, Dick B.; Brusseau, Mark L; Maier, Raina Margaret.

In: Chemosphere, Vol. 66, No. 9, 01.2007, p. 1634-1642.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Ochoa-Loza, Francisco J. ; Noordman, Wouter H. ; Jannsen, Dick B. ; Brusseau, Mark L ; Maier, Raina Margaret. / Effect of clays, metal oxides, and organic matter on rhamnolipid biosurfactant sorption by soil. In: Chemosphere. 2007 ; Vol. 66, No. 9. pp. 1634-1642.
@article{bf5f55cc28954e3ba7159e879e8a0293,
title = "Effect of clays, metal oxides, and organic matter on rhamnolipid biosurfactant sorption by soil",
abstract = "Rhamnolipids produced by Pseudomonas aeruginosa have been proposed as soil washing agents for enhanced removal of metal and organic contaminants from soil. A potential limitation for the application of rhamnolipids is sorption by soil matrix components. The objective of this study is to empirically determine the contribution of representative soil constituents (clays, metal oxides, and organic matter) to sorption of the rhamnolipid form most efficient at metal complexation (monorhamnolipid). Sorption studies show that monorhamnolipid (R1) sorption is concentration dependent. At low R1 concentrations that are relevant for enhancing organic contaminant biodegradation, R1 sorption followed the order: hematite (Fe2O3) > kaolinite > MnO2 ≈ illite ≈ Ca-montmorillonite > gibbsite (Al(OH)3) > humic acid-coated silica. At high R1 concentrations, relevant for use in complexation/removal of metals or organics, R1 sorption followed the order: illite >> humic acid-coated silica > Ca-montmorillonite > hematite > MnO2 > gibbsite ≈ kaolinite. These results allowed prediction of R1 sorption by a series of six soils. Finally, a comparison of R1 and R2 (dirhamnolipid) shows that the R1 form sorbs more strongly alone than when in a mixture of both the R1 and R2 forms. The information presented can be used to estimate, on an individual soil basis, the extent of rhamnolipid sorption. This is important for determining: (1) whether rhamnolipid addition is a feasible remediation option and (2) the amount of rhamnolipid required to efficiently remove the contaminant.",
keywords = "Bioremediation, Biosurfactant, Remediation, Rhamnolipid, Soil washing, Sorption, Surfactant",
author = "Ochoa-Loza, {Francisco J.} and Noordman, {Wouter H.} and Jannsen, {Dick B.} and Brusseau, {Mark L} and Maier, {Raina Margaret}",
year = "2007",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.chemosphere.2006.07.068",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "66",
pages = "1634--1642",
journal = "Chemosphere",
issn = "0045-6535",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",
number = "9",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Effect of clays, metal oxides, and organic matter on rhamnolipid biosurfactant sorption by soil

AU - Ochoa-Loza, Francisco J.

AU - Noordman, Wouter H.

AU - Jannsen, Dick B.

AU - Brusseau, Mark L

AU - Maier, Raina Margaret

PY - 2007/1

Y1 - 2007/1

N2 - Rhamnolipids produced by Pseudomonas aeruginosa have been proposed as soil washing agents for enhanced removal of metal and organic contaminants from soil. A potential limitation for the application of rhamnolipids is sorption by soil matrix components. The objective of this study is to empirically determine the contribution of representative soil constituents (clays, metal oxides, and organic matter) to sorption of the rhamnolipid form most efficient at metal complexation (monorhamnolipid). Sorption studies show that monorhamnolipid (R1) sorption is concentration dependent. At low R1 concentrations that are relevant for enhancing organic contaminant biodegradation, R1 sorption followed the order: hematite (Fe2O3) > kaolinite > MnO2 ≈ illite ≈ Ca-montmorillonite > gibbsite (Al(OH)3) > humic acid-coated silica. At high R1 concentrations, relevant for use in complexation/removal of metals or organics, R1 sorption followed the order: illite >> humic acid-coated silica > Ca-montmorillonite > hematite > MnO2 > gibbsite ≈ kaolinite. These results allowed prediction of R1 sorption by a series of six soils. Finally, a comparison of R1 and R2 (dirhamnolipid) shows that the R1 form sorbs more strongly alone than when in a mixture of both the R1 and R2 forms. The information presented can be used to estimate, on an individual soil basis, the extent of rhamnolipid sorption. This is important for determining: (1) whether rhamnolipid addition is a feasible remediation option and (2) the amount of rhamnolipid required to efficiently remove the contaminant.

AB - Rhamnolipids produced by Pseudomonas aeruginosa have been proposed as soil washing agents for enhanced removal of metal and organic contaminants from soil. A potential limitation for the application of rhamnolipids is sorption by soil matrix components. The objective of this study is to empirically determine the contribution of representative soil constituents (clays, metal oxides, and organic matter) to sorption of the rhamnolipid form most efficient at metal complexation (monorhamnolipid). Sorption studies show that monorhamnolipid (R1) sorption is concentration dependent. At low R1 concentrations that are relevant for enhancing organic contaminant biodegradation, R1 sorption followed the order: hematite (Fe2O3) > kaolinite > MnO2 ≈ illite ≈ Ca-montmorillonite > gibbsite (Al(OH)3) > humic acid-coated silica. At high R1 concentrations, relevant for use in complexation/removal of metals or organics, R1 sorption followed the order: illite >> humic acid-coated silica > Ca-montmorillonite > hematite > MnO2 > gibbsite ≈ kaolinite. These results allowed prediction of R1 sorption by a series of six soils. Finally, a comparison of R1 and R2 (dirhamnolipid) shows that the R1 form sorbs more strongly alone than when in a mixture of both the R1 and R2 forms. The information presented can be used to estimate, on an individual soil basis, the extent of rhamnolipid sorption. This is important for determining: (1) whether rhamnolipid addition is a feasible remediation option and (2) the amount of rhamnolipid required to efficiently remove the contaminant.

KW - Bioremediation

KW - Biosurfactant

KW - Remediation

KW - Rhamnolipid

KW - Soil washing

KW - Sorption

KW - Surfactant

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33845227117&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33845227117&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2006.07.068

DO - 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2006.07.068

M3 - Article

C2 - 16965801

AN - SCOPUS:33845227117

VL - 66

SP - 1634

EP - 1642

JO - Chemosphere

JF - Chemosphere

SN - 0045-6535

IS - 9

ER -