Effect of extrinsic incentives on use of test anxiety as an anticipatory attributional defense: Playing it cool when the stakes are high

Jeff L Greenberg, Tom Pyszczynski, Chris Paisley

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

27 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Assessed the effect of extrinsic incentives on the use of test anxiety as a self-handicapping strategy. It was hypothesized that although reports of anxiety may be greater when such symptoms can serve a defensive function, this effect occurs only when extrinsic incentives are low and not under conditions of high extrinsic incentive. 84 male undergraduates anticipated taking a test of intellectual abilities and either were led to believe that test anxiety has no effect on test performance or were given no particular information about the relation between test anxiety and performance. Ss were offered either $5 or $25 for obtaining the highest score on the test. Consistent with predictions, no-information Ss reported greater test anxiety before the test than did those who believed that test anxiety was unrelated to performance, but only when the extrinsic incentive for performance was low. However, these Ss did not report greater cognitive interference or exhibit lower test scores than did Ss in other conditions. It is suggested that the defensive strategy used by these Ss consisted of altering perceptions of anxiety, rather than anxiety itself. Implications of the absence of self-handicapping under high incentive conditions are discussed. (26 ref) (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2006 APA, all rights reserved).

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1136-1145
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Personality and Social Psychology
Volume47
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 1984

Fingerprint

Motivation
Anxiety
incentive
anxiety
performance
Aptitude
interference
ability

Keywords

  • extrinsic incentives, use of test anxiety as self-handicapping strategy, male college students

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Social Psychology

Cite this

Effect of extrinsic incentives on use of test anxiety as an anticipatory attributional defense : Playing it cool when the stakes are high. / Greenberg, Jeff L; Pyszczynski, Tom; Paisley, Chris.

In: Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 47, No. 5, 11.1984, p. 1136-1145.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{2828497b381c4a52bd3f62e45be2a8e3,
title = "Effect of extrinsic incentives on use of test anxiety as an anticipatory attributional defense: Playing it cool when the stakes are high",
abstract = "Assessed the effect of extrinsic incentives on the use of test anxiety as a self-handicapping strategy. It was hypothesized that although reports of anxiety may be greater when such symptoms can serve a defensive function, this effect occurs only when extrinsic incentives are low and not under conditions of high extrinsic incentive. 84 male undergraduates anticipated taking a test of intellectual abilities and either were led to believe that test anxiety has no effect on test performance or were given no particular information about the relation between test anxiety and performance. Ss were offered either $5 or $25 for obtaining the highest score on the test. Consistent with predictions, no-information Ss reported greater test anxiety before the test than did those who believed that test anxiety was unrelated to performance, but only when the extrinsic incentive for performance was low. However, these Ss did not report greater cognitive interference or exhibit lower test scores than did Ss in other conditions. It is suggested that the defensive strategy used by these Ss consisted of altering perceptions of anxiety, rather than anxiety itself. Implications of the absence of self-handicapping under high incentive conditions are discussed. (26 ref) (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2006 APA, all rights reserved).",
keywords = "extrinsic incentives, use of test anxiety as self-handicapping strategy, male college students",
author = "Greenberg, {Jeff L} and Tom Pyszczynski and Chris Paisley",
year = "1984",
month = "11",
doi = "10.1037/0022-3514.47.5.1136",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "47",
pages = "1136--1145",
journal = "Journal of Personality and Social Psychology",
issn = "0022-3514",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Effect of extrinsic incentives on use of test anxiety as an anticipatory attributional defense

T2 - Playing it cool when the stakes are high

AU - Greenberg, Jeff L

AU - Pyszczynski, Tom

AU - Paisley, Chris

PY - 1984/11

Y1 - 1984/11

N2 - Assessed the effect of extrinsic incentives on the use of test anxiety as a self-handicapping strategy. It was hypothesized that although reports of anxiety may be greater when such symptoms can serve a defensive function, this effect occurs only when extrinsic incentives are low and not under conditions of high extrinsic incentive. 84 male undergraduates anticipated taking a test of intellectual abilities and either were led to believe that test anxiety has no effect on test performance or were given no particular information about the relation between test anxiety and performance. Ss were offered either $5 or $25 for obtaining the highest score on the test. Consistent with predictions, no-information Ss reported greater test anxiety before the test than did those who believed that test anxiety was unrelated to performance, but only when the extrinsic incentive for performance was low. However, these Ss did not report greater cognitive interference or exhibit lower test scores than did Ss in other conditions. It is suggested that the defensive strategy used by these Ss consisted of altering perceptions of anxiety, rather than anxiety itself. Implications of the absence of self-handicapping under high incentive conditions are discussed. (26 ref) (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2006 APA, all rights reserved).

AB - Assessed the effect of extrinsic incentives on the use of test anxiety as a self-handicapping strategy. It was hypothesized that although reports of anxiety may be greater when such symptoms can serve a defensive function, this effect occurs only when extrinsic incentives are low and not under conditions of high extrinsic incentive. 84 male undergraduates anticipated taking a test of intellectual abilities and either were led to believe that test anxiety has no effect on test performance or were given no particular information about the relation between test anxiety and performance. Ss were offered either $5 or $25 for obtaining the highest score on the test. Consistent with predictions, no-information Ss reported greater test anxiety before the test than did those who believed that test anxiety was unrelated to performance, but only when the extrinsic incentive for performance was low. However, these Ss did not report greater cognitive interference or exhibit lower test scores than did Ss in other conditions. It is suggested that the defensive strategy used by these Ss consisted of altering perceptions of anxiety, rather than anxiety itself. Implications of the absence of self-handicapping under high incentive conditions are discussed. (26 ref) (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2006 APA, all rights reserved).

KW - extrinsic incentives, use of test anxiety as self-handicapping strategy, male college students

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0021530628&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0021530628&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1037/0022-3514.47.5.1136

DO - 10.1037/0022-3514.47.5.1136

M3 - Article

C2 - 6520705

AN - SCOPUS:0021530628

VL - 47

SP - 1136

EP - 1145

JO - Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

JF - Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

SN - 0022-3514

IS - 5

ER -