Effective integrated frameworks for assessing mining sustainability

K. M. Virgone, M. Ramirez-Andreotta, J. Mainhagu, Mark L Brusseau

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The objectives of this research are to review existing methods used for assessing mining sustainability, analyze the limited prior research that has evaluated the methods, and identify key characteristics that would constitute an enhanced sustainability framework that would serve to improve sustainability reporting in the mining industry. Five of the most relevant frameworks were selected for comparison in this analysis, and the results show that there are many commonalities among the five, as well as some disparities. In addition, relevant components are missing from all five. An enhanced evaluation system and framework were created to provide a more holistic, comprehensive method for sustainability assessment and reporting. The proposed framework has five components that build from and encompass the twelve evaluation characteristics used in the analysis. The components include Foundation, Focus, Breadth, Quality Assurance, and Relevance. The enhanced framework promotes a comprehensive, location-specific reporting approach with a concise set of well-defined indicators. Built into the framework is quality assurance, as well as a defined method to use information from sustainability reports to inform decisions. The framework incorporates human health and socioeconomic aspects via initiatives such as community-engaged research, economic valuations, and community-initiated environmental monitoring.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1-21
Number of pages21
JournalEnvironmental Geochemistry and Health
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - May 28 2018

Fingerprint

Sustainable development
sustainability
Quality assurance
Information use
Mineral industry
environmental monitoring
mining industry
valuation
Health
Economics
method
Monitoring
economics
quality assurance
analysis
evaluation

Keywords

  • Environmental impact
  • Indicators
  • Mining
  • Sustainability

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Environmental Engineering
  • Environmental Chemistry
  • Water Science and Technology
  • Environmental Science(all)
  • Geochemistry and Petrology

Cite this

Effective integrated frameworks for assessing mining sustainability. / Virgone, K. M.; Ramirez-Andreotta, M.; Mainhagu, J.; Brusseau, Mark L.

In: Environmental Geochemistry and Health, 28.05.2018, p. 1-21.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{cccf94d4ae4d4fc0ab5ec494201e6125,
title = "Effective integrated frameworks for assessing mining sustainability",
abstract = "The objectives of this research are to review existing methods used for assessing mining sustainability, analyze the limited prior research that has evaluated the methods, and identify key characteristics that would constitute an enhanced sustainability framework that would serve to improve sustainability reporting in the mining industry. Five of the most relevant frameworks were selected for comparison in this analysis, and the results show that there are many commonalities among the five, as well as some disparities. In addition, relevant components are missing from all five. An enhanced evaluation system and framework were created to provide a more holistic, comprehensive method for sustainability assessment and reporting. The proposed framework has five components that build from and encompass the twelve evaluation characteristics used in the analysis. The components include Foundation, Focus, Breadth, Quality Assurance, and Relevance. The enhanced framework promotes a comprehensive, location-specific reporting approach with a concise set of well-defined indicators. Built into the framework is quality assurance, as well as a defined method to use information from sustainability reports to inform decisions. The framework incorporates human health and socioeconomic aspects via initiatives such as community-engaged research, economic valuations, and community-initiated environmental monitoring.",
keywords = "Environmental impact, Indicators, Mining, Sustainability",
author = "Virgone, {K. M.} and M. Ramirez-Andreotta and J. Mainhagu and Brusseau, {Mark L}",
year = "2018",
month = "5",
day = "28",
doi = "10.1007/s10653-018-0128-6",
language = "English (US)",
pages = "1--21",
journal = "Environmental Geochemistry and Health",
issn = "0269-4042",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Effective integrated frameworks for assessing mining sustainability

AU - Virgone, K. M.

AU - Ramirez-Andreotta, M.

AU - Mainhagu, J.

AU - Brusseau, Mark L

PY - 2018/5/28

Y1 - 2018/5/28

N2 - The objectives of this research are to review existing methods used for assessing mining sustainability, analyze the limited prior research that has evaluated the methods, and identify key characteristics that would constitute an enhanced sustainability framework that would serve to improve sustainability reporting in the mining industry. Five of the most relevant frameworks were selected for comparison in this analysis, and the results show that there are many commonalities among the five, as well as some disparities. In addition, relevant components are missing from all five. An enhanced evaluation system and framework were created to provide a more holistic, comprehensive method for sustainability assessment and reporting. The proposed framework has five components that build from and encompass the twelve evaluation characteristics used in the analysis. The components include Foundation, Focus, Breadth, Quality Assurance, and Relevance. The enhanced framework promotes a comprehensive, location-specific reporting approach with a concise set of well-defined indicators. Built into the framework is quality assurance, as well as a defined method to use information from sustainability reports to inform decisions. The framework incorporates human health and socioeconomic aspects via initiatives such as community-engaged research, economic valuations, and community-initiated environmental monitoring.

AB - The objectives of this research are to review existing methods used for assessing mining sustainability, analyze the limited prior research that has evaluated the methods, and identify key characteristics that would constitute an enhanced sustainability framework that would serve to improve sustainability reporting in the mining industry. Five of the most relevant frameworks were selected for comparison in this analysis, and the results show that there are many commonalities among the five, as well as some disparities. In addition, relevant components are missing from all five. An enhanced evaluation system and framework were created to provide a more holistic, comprehensive method for sustainability assessment and reporting. The proposed framework has five components that build from and encompass the twelve evaluation characteristics used in the analysis. The components include Foundation, Focus, Breadth, Quality Assurance, and Relevance. The enhanced framework promotes a comprehensive, location-specific reporting approach with a concise set of well-defined indicators. Built into the framework is quality assurance, as well as a defined method to use information from sustainability reports to inform decisions. The framework incorporates human health and socioeconomic aspects via initiatives such as community-engaged research, economic valuations, and community-initiated environmental monitoring.

KW - Environmental impact

KW - Indicators

KW - Mining

KW - Sustainability

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85047660501&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85047660501&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s10653-018-0128-6

DO - 10.1007/s10653-018-0128-6

M3 - Article

C2 - 29808248

AN - SCOPUS:85047660501

SP - 1

EP - 21

JO - Environmental Geochemistry and Health

JF - Environmental Geochemistry and Health

SN - 0269-4042

ER -