Effectiveness and safety of bronchial thermoplasty in the treatment of severe asthma: A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled clinical trial

Mario Castro, Adalberto S. Rubin, Michel Laviolette, Jussara Fiterman, Marina De Andrade Lima, Pallav L. Shah, Elie Fiss, Ronald Olivenstein, Neil C. Thomson, Robert M. Niven, Ian D. Pavord, Michael Simoff, David R. Duhamel, Charlene McEvoy, Richard Barbers, Nicolaas H.T. Ten Hacken, Michael E. Wechsler, Mark Holmes, Martin J. Phillips, Serpil ErzurumWilliam Lunn, Elliot Israel, Nizar Jarjour, Monica Kraft, Narinder S. Shargill, John Quiring, Scott M. Berry, Gerard Cox

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

450 Scopus citations

Abstract

Rationale: Bronchial thermoplasty (BT) is a bronchoscopic procedure in which controlled thermal energy is applied to the airway wall to decrease smooth muscle. Objectives: To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of BT versus a sham procedure in subjects with severe asthma who remain symptomatic despite treatment with high-dose inhaled corticosteroids and long-acting β2-agonists. Methods: A total of 288 adult subjects (Intent-to-Treat [ITT]) randomized to BT or sham control underwent three bronchoscopy procedures. Primary outcome was the difference in Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ) scores from baseline to average of 6, 9, and 12 months (integrated AQLQ). Adverse events and health care use were collected to assess safety. Statistical design and analysis of the primary endpoint was Bayesian. Target posterior probability of superiority (PPS) of BT over sham was 95%, except for the primary endpoint (96.4%). Measurements and Main Results: The improvement from baseline in the integrated AQLQ score was superior in the BT group compared with sham (BT, 1.35 ± 1.10; sham, 1.16 ± 1.23 [PPS, 96.0% ITT and 97.9% per protocol]). Seventy-nine percent of BT and 64% of sham subjects achieved changes in AQLQ of 0.5 or greater (PPS, 99.6%). Six percent more BT subjects were hospitalized in the treatment period (up to 6 wk after BT). In the posttreatment period (6-52 wk after BT), the BT group experienced fewer severe exacerbations, emergency department (ED) visits, and days missed from work/ school compared with the sham group (PPS, 95.5, 99.9, and 99.3%, respectively). Conclusions: BT in subjects with severe asthma improves asthmaspecific quality of life with a reduction in severe exacerbations and healthcare use in the posttreatment period. Clinical trial registered with www.clinialtrials.gov (NCT00231114).

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)116-124
Number of pages9
JournalAmerican journal of respiratory and critical care medicine
Volume181
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 15 2010

Keywords

  • Alair Bronchial Thermoplasty System
  • Asthma
  • Asthma Quality of Life
  • Bronchial thermoplasty
  • Bronchoscopic procedure

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Effectiveness and safety of bronchial thermoplasty in the treatment of severe asthma: A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled clinical trial'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this

    Castro, M., Rubin, A. S., Laviolette, M., Fiterman, J., Lima, M. D. A., Shah, P. L., Fiss, E., Olivenstein, R., Thomson, N. C., Niven, R. M., Pavord, I. D., Simoff, M., Duhamel, D. R., McEvoy, C., Barbers, R., Ten Hacken, N. H. T., Wechsler, M. E., Holmes, M., Phillips, M. J., ... Cox, G. (2010). Effectiveness and safety of bronchial thermoplasty in the treatment of severe asthma: A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled clinical trial. American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine, 181(2), 116-124. https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.200903-0354OC