Effects of animacy on processing relative clauses in older and younger adults

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Sentences with object relative clauses are more difficult to process than sentences with subject relative clauses, but the processing penalty associated with object relatives is greater when the sentential subject is an animate than when it is an inanimate noun. The present study tested the hypothesis that older adults are more sensitive to this type of semantic constraint than younger adults. Older and younger adults (n = 28 per group) participated in a self-paced listening study. The critical sentences contained subject and object relative clauses and had animate or inanimate subjects. Both older and younger adults had longer listening times for critical segments in object than in subject relative clause in both animacy conditions. Critically, the animacy manipulation disrupted older adults more than younger adults. These results are consistent with the claim that older adults rely on experience-based expectations to a greater extent than younger adults.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)487-498
Number of pages12
JournalQuarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology
Volume68
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 4 2015

Fingerprint

Young Adult
Semantics

Keywords

  • Ageing
  • Animacy
  • Constraint satisfaction
  • Risky strategy hypothesis
  • Sentence comprehension

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Physiology
  • Physiology (medical)
  • Psychology(all)
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology

Cite this

Effects of animacy on processing relative clauses in older and younger adults. / DeDe, Gayle L.

In: Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, Vol. 68, No. 3, 04.03.2015, p. 487-498.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{11c561d85ff443a79d36b0c735a0c1dc,
title = "Effects of animacy on processing relative clauses in older and younger adults",
abstract = "Sentences with object relative clauses are more difficult to process than sentences with subject relative clauses, but the processing penalty associated with object relatives is greater when the sentential subject is an animate than when it is an inanimate noun. The present study tested the hypothesis that older adults are more sensitive to this type of semantic constraint than younger adults. Older and younger adults (n = 28 per group) participated in a self-paced listening study. The critical sentences contained subject and object relative clauses and had animate or inanimate subjects. Both older and younger adults had longer listening times for critical segments in object than in subject relative clause in both animacy conditions. Critically, the animacy manipulation disrupted older adults more than younger adults. These results are consistent with the claim that older adults rely on experience-based expectations to a greater extent than younger adults.",
keywords = "Ageing, Animacy, Constraint satisfaction, Risky strategy hypothesis, Sentence comprehension",
author = "DeDe, {Gayle L}",
year = "2015",
month = "3",
day = "4",
doi = "10.1080/17470218.2014.956766",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "68",
pages = "487--498",
journal = "Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology",
issn = "1747-0218",
publisher = "Psychology Press Ltd",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Effects of animacy on processing relative clauses in older and younger adults

AU - DeDe, Gayle L

PY - 2015/3/4

Y1 - 2015/3/4

N2 - Sentences with object relative clauses are more difficult to process than sentences with subject relative clauses, but the processing penalty associated with object relatives is greater when the sentential subject is an animate than when it is an inanimate noun. The present study tested the hypothesis that older adults are more sensitive to this type of semantic constraint than younger adults. Older and younger adults (n = 28 per group) participated in a self-paced listening study. The critical sentences contained subject and object relative clauses and had animate or inanimate subjects. Both older and younger adults had longer listening times for critical segments in object than in subject relative clause in both animacy conditions. Critically, the animacy manipulation disrupted older adults more than younger adults. These results are consistent with the claim that older adults rely on experience-based expectations to a greater extent than younger adults.

AB - Sentences with object relative clauses are more difficult to process than sentences with subject relative clauses, but the processing penalty associated with object relatives is greater when the sentential subject is an animate than when it is an inanimate noun. The present study tested the hypothesis that older adults are more sensitive to this type of semantic constraint than younger adults. Older and younger adults (n = 28 per group) participated in a self-paced listening study. The critical sentences contained subject and object relative clauses and had animate or inanimate subjects. Both older and younger adults had longer listening times for critical segments in object than in subject relative clause in both animacy conditions. Critically, the animacy manipulation disrupted older adults more than younger adults. These results are consistent with the claim that older adults rely on experience-based expectations to a greater extent than younger adults.

KW - Ageing

KW - Animacy

KW - Constraint satisfaction

KW - Risky strategy hypothesis

KW - Sentence comprehension

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84923540696&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84923540696&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/17470218.2014.956766

DO - 10.1080/17470218.2014.956766

M3 - Article

VL - 68

SP - 487

EP - 498

JO - Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology

JF - Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology

SN - 1747-0218

IS - 3

ER -