Effects of membrane structure and operational variables on membrane distillation performance

Vasiliki Karanikola, Andrea F. Corral, Hua Jiang, Avelino E Saez, Wendell P Ela, Robert G Arnold

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

16 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

A bench-scale, sweeping gas, flat-sheet Membrane Distillation (MD) unit was used to assess the importance of membrane architecture and operational variables to distillate production rate. Sweeping gas membrane distillation (SGMD) was simulated for various membrane characteristics (material, pore size, porosity and thickness), spacer dimensions and operating conditions (influent brine temperature, sweep gas flow rate and brine flow rate) based on coupled mass and energy balances. Model calibration was carried out using four membranes that differed in terms of material selection, effective pore size, thickness and porosity. Membrane tortuosity was the lone fitting parameter. Distillate fluxes and temperature profiles from experiments matched simulations over a wide range of operating conditions. Limitations to distillate production were then investigated via simulations, noting implications for MD design and operation. Under the majority of conditions investigated, membrane resistance to mass transport provided the primary limitation to water purification rate. The nominal or effective membrane pore size and the lumped parameter ε/δτ (porosity divided by the product of membrane tortuosity and thickness) were primary determinants of membrane resistance to mass transport. Resistance to Knudsen diffusion dominated membrane resistance at pore diameters &$2lt;0.3 µm. At larger pore sizes, a combination of resistances to intra-pore molecular diffusion and convection across the gas-phase boundary layer determined mass transport resistance. Findings are restricted to the module design flow regimes considered in the modeling effort. Nevertheless, the value of performance simulation to membrane distillation design and operation is well illustrated.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)87-96
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Membrane Science
Volume524
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 15 2017

Fingerprint

membrane structures
Membrane structures
Distillation
distillation
membranes
Membranes
porosity
Pore size
Porosity
Gases
Mass transfer
flow velocity
Flow rate
materials selection
Convection
Temperature
molecular diffusion
water treatment
simulation
Water Purification

Keywords

  • Desalination
  • Flat sheet membrane
  • Heat and mass transfer
  • Sweeping gas membrane distillation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biochemistry
  • Materials Science(all)
  • Physical and Theoretical Chemistry
  • Filtration and Separation

Cite this

Effects of membrane structure and operational variables on membrane distillation performance. / Karanikola, Vasiliki; Corral, Andrea F.; Jiang, Hua; Saez, Avelino E; Ela, Wendell P; Arnold, Robert G.

In: Journal of Membrane Science, Vol. 524, 15.02.2017, p. 87-96.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{4965d07965dd4f3483dc2f1c41ac143c,
title = "Effects of membrane structure and operational variables on membrane distillation performance",
abstract = "A bench-scale, sweeping gas, flat-sheet Membrane Distillation (MD) unit was used to assess the importance of membrane architecture and operational variables to distillate production rate. Sweeping gas membrane distillation (SGMD) was simulated for various membrane characteristics (material, pore size, porosity and thickness), spacer dimensions and operating conditions (influent brine temperature, sweep gas flow rate and brine flow rate) based on coupled mass and energy balances. Model calibration was carried out using four membranes that differed in terms of material selection, effective pore size, thickness and porosity. Membrane tortuosity was the lone fitting parameter. Distillate fluxes and temperature profiles from experiments matched simulations over a wide range of operating conditions. Limitations to distillate production were then investigated via simulations, noting implications for MD design and operation. Under the majority of conditions investigated, membrane resistance to mass transport provided the primary limitation to water purification rate. The nominal or effective membrane pore size and the lumped parameter ε/δτ (porosity divided by the product of membrane tortuosity and thickness) were primary determinants of membrane resistance to mass transport. Resistance to Knudsen diffusion dominated membrane resistance at pore diameters &$2lt;0.3 µm. At larger pore sizes, a combination of resistances to intra-pore molecular diffusion and convection across the gas-phase boundary layer determined mass transport resistance. Findings are restricted to the module design flow regimes considered in the modeling effort. Nevertheless, the value of performance simulation to membrane distillation design and operation is well illustrated.",
keywords = "Desalination, Flat sheet membrane, Heat and mass transfer, Sweeping gas membrane distillation",
author = "Vasiliki Karanikola and Corral, {Andrea F.} and Hua Jiang and Saez, {Avelino E} and Ela, {Wendell P} and Arnold, {Robert G}",
year = "2017",
month = "2",
day = "15",
doi = "10.1016/j.memsci.2016.11.038",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "524",
pages = "87--96",
journal = "Jornal of Membrane Science",
issn = "0376-7388",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Effects of membrane structure and operational variables on membrane distillation performance

AU - Karanikola, Vasiliki

AU - Corral, Andrea F.

AU - Jiang, Hua

AU - Saez, Avelino E

AU - Ela, Wendell P

AU - Arnold, Robert G

PY - 2017/2/15

Y1 - 2017/2/15

N2 - A bench-scale, sweeping gas, flat-sheet Membrane Distillation (MD) unit was used to assess the importance of membrane architecture and operational variables to distillate production rate. Sweeping gas membrane distillation (SGMD) was simulated for various membrane characteristics (material, pore size, porosity and thickness), spacer dimensions and operating conditions (influent brine temperature, sweep gas flow rate and brine flow rate) based on coupled mass and energy balances. Model calibration was carried out using four membranes that differed in terms of material selection, effective pore size, thickness and porosity. Membrane tortuosity was the lone fitting parameter. Distillate fluxes and temperature profiles from experiments matched simulations over a wide range of operating conditions. Limitations to distillate production were then investigated via simulations, noting implications for MD design and operation. Under the majority of conditions investigated, membrane resistance to mass transport provided the primary limitation to water purification rate. The nominal or effective membrane pore size and the lumped parameter ε/δτ (porosity divided by the product of membrane tortuosity and thickness) were primary determinants of membrane resistance to mass transport. Resistance to Knudsen diffusion dominated membrane resistance at pore diameters &$2lt;0.3 µm. At larger pore sizes, a combination of resistances to intra-pore molecular diffusion and convection across the gas-phase boundary layer determined mass transport resistance. Findings are restricted to the module design flow regimes considered in the modeling effort. Nevertheless, the value of performance simulation to membrane distillation design and operation is well illustrated.

AB - A bench-scale, sweeping gas, flat-sheet Membrane Distillation (MD) unit was used to assess the importance of membrane architecture and operational variables to distillate production rate. Sweeping gas membrane distillation (SGMD) was simulated for various membrane characteristics (material, pore size, porosity and thickness), spacer dimensions and operating conditions (influent brine temperature, sweep gas flow rate and brine flow rate) based on coupled mass and energy balances. Model calibration was carried out using four membranes that differed in terms of material selection, effective pore size, thickness and porosity. Membrane tortuosity was the lone fitting parameter. Distillate fluxes and temperature profiles from experiments matched simulations over a wide range of operating conditions. Limitations to distillate production were then investigated via simulations, noting implications for MD design and operation. Under the majority of conditions investigated, membrane resistance to mass transport provided the primary limitation to water purification rate. The nominal or effective membrane pore size and the lumped parameter ε/δτ (porosity divided by the product of membrane tortuosity and thickness) were primary determinants of membrane resistance to mass transport. Resistance to Knudsen diffusion dominated membrane resistance at pore diameters &$2lt;0.3 µm. At larger pore sizes, a combination of resistances to intra-pore molecular diffusion and convection across the gas-phase boundary layer determined mass transport resistance. Findings are restricted to the module design flow regimes considered in the modeling effort. Nevertheless, the value of performance simulation to membrane distillation design and operation is well illustrated.

KW - Desalination

KW - Flat sheet membrane

KW - Heat and mass transfer

KW - Sweeping gas membrane distillation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84995948852&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84995948852&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.memsci.2016.11.038

DO - 10.1016/j.memsci.2016.11.038

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84995948852

VL - 524

SP - 87

EP - 96

JO - Jornal of Membrane Science

JF - Jornal of Membrane Science

SN - 0376-7388

ER -