Effects of Procedural and Distributive Justice on Reactions to a Selection System

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

340 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Procedural and distributive justice were examined in an employee selection situation. Along procedural justice dimensions, job relatedness of and explanation offered for the selection procedures were manipulated. Distributive justice was examined through manipulation of a selection decision and collection of a priori hiring expectations. Dependent measures included fairness reactions, recommendation intentions, self-efficacy, and actual work performance. Undergraduates (n = 260) were selected/rejected for paid employment. Job relatedness influenced performance and interacted with selection decision on perceptions of distributive fairness and self-efficacy. Explanations influenced recommendations of rejected applicants. Interactions between hiring expectations and selection decision were observed on perceived fairness and recommendation intentions. Discussion focuses on theoretical and practical implications of the observed interactions.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)691-701
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of Applied Psychology
Volume79
Issue number5
StatePublished - Oct 1994
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Social Justice
Self Efficacy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Applied Psychology

Cite this

Effects of Procedural and Distributive Justice on Reactions to a Selection System. / Gilliland, Stephen W.

In: Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 79, No. 5, 10.1994, p. 691-701.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{23c1acebe2a843fa82445c8381839bf1,
title = "Effects of Procedural and Distributive Justice on Reactions to a Selection System",
abstract = "Procedural and distributive justice were examined in an employee selection situation. Along procedural justice dimensions, job relatedness of and explanation offered for the selection procedures were manipulated. Distributive justice was examined through manipulation of a selection decision and collection of a priori hiring expectations. Dependent measures included fairness reactions, recommendation intentions, self-efficacy, and actual work performance. Undergraduates (n = 260) were selected/rejected for paid employment. Job relatedness influenced performance and interacted with selection decision on perceptions of distributive fairness and self-efficacy. Explanations influenced recommendations of rejected applicants. Interactions between hiring expectations and selection decision were observed on perceived fairness and recommendation intentions. Discussion focuses on theoretical and practical implications of the observed interactions.",
author = "Gilliland, {Stephen W}",
year = "1994",
month = "10",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "79",
pages = "691--701",
journal = "Journal of Applied Psychology",
issn = "0021-9010",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Effects of Procedural and Distributive Justice on Reactions to a Selection System

AU - Gilliland, Stephen W

PY - 1994/10

Y1 - 1994/10

N2 - Procedural and distributive justice were examined in an employee selection situation. Along procedural justice dimensions, job relatedness of and explanation offered for the selection procedures were manipulated. Distributive justice was examined through manipulation of a selection decision and collection of a priori hiring expectations. Dependent measures included fairness reactions, recommendation intentions, self-efficacy, and actual work performance. Undergraduates (n = 260) were selected/rejected for paid employment. Job relatedness influenced performance and interacted with selection decision on perceptions of distributive fairness and self-efficacy. Explanations influenced recommendations of rejected applicants. Interactions between hiring expectations and selection decision were observed on perceived fairness and recommendation intentions. Discussion focuses on theoretical and practical implications of the observed interactions.

AB - Procedural and distributive justice were examined in an employee selection situation. Along procedural justice dimensions, job relatedness of and explanation offered for the selection procedures were manipulated. Distributive justice was examined through manipulation of a selection decision and collection of a priori hiring expectations. Dependent measures included fairness reactions, recommendation intentions, self-efficacy, and actual work performance. Undergraduates (n = 260) were selected/rejected for paid employment. Job relatedness influenced performance and interacted with selection decision on perceptions of distributive fairness and self-efficacy. Explanations influenced recommendations of rejected applicants. Interactions between hiring expectations and selection decision were observed on perceived fairness and recommendation intentions. Discussion focuses on theoretical and practical implications of the observed interactions.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=21844521849&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=21844521849&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:21844521849

VL - 79

SP - 691

EP - 701

JO - Journal of Applied Psychology

JF - Journal of Applied Psychology

SN - 0021-9010

IS - 5

ER -