Effects of proportionate-share impact fees

Gregory S. Burge, Arthur Christian Nelson, John Matthews

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

15 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

When it comes to paying for the significant costs of growth, local governments throughout the United States are usually the first line of financing. Yet because of a variety of factors, existing tax, fee, and interjurisdictional transfer revenues may not be sufficient. Many hundreds (if not thousands) of communities rely in part on proportionate-share impact fees to provide facilities concurrent with the effects of growth. Impact fees have numerous detractors, many of whom worry about their effect on affordable housing, economic development, and development patterns. A disparate literature has emerged addressing each of these concerns. This article synthesizes current knowledge about the market effects of proportionate-share impact fees and finds that for the most part, they facilitate development in several important ways. Policy implications and guidance for future research are presented as well.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)679-710
Number of pages32
JournalHousing Policy Debate
Volume18
Issue number4
StatePublished - 2007
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

fee
affordable housing
taxes
local government
revenue
economic development
housing
market
effect
costs
cost
community
economics

Keywords

  • Affordability
  • Growth management
  • Urban policy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Development
  • Urban Studies

Cite this

Burge, G. S., Nelson, A. C., & Matthews, J. (2007). Effects of proportionate-share impact fees. Housing Policy Debate, 18(4), 679-710.

Effects of proportionate-share impact fees. / Burge, Gregory S.; Nelson, Arthur Christian; Matthews, John.

In: Housing Policy Debate, Vol. 18, No. 4, 2007, p. 679-710.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Burge, GS, Nelson, AC & Matthews, J 2007, 'Effects of proportionate-share impact fees', Housing Policy Debate, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 679-710.
Burge, Gregory S. ; Nelson, Arthur Christian ; Matthews, John. / Effects of proportionate-share impact fees. In: Housing Policy Debate. 2007 ; Vol. 18, No. 4. pp. 679-710.
@article{057ec1a7b48e4db4a05e7d1c8cb8250a,
title = "Effects of proportionate-share impact fees",
abstract = "When it comes to paying for the significant costs of growth, local governments throughout the United States are usually the first line of financing. Yet because of a variety of factors, existing tax, fee, and interjurisdictional transfer revenues may not be sufficient. Many hundreds (if not thousands) of communities rely in part on proportionate-share impact fees to provide facilities concurrent with the effects of growth. Impact fees have numerous detractors, many of whom worry about their effect on affordable housing, economic development, and development patterns. A disparate literature has emerged addressing each of these concerns. This article synthesizes current knowledge about the market effects of proportionate-share impact fees and finds that for the most part, they facilitate development in several important ways. Policy implications and guidance for future research are presented as well.",
keywords = "Affordability, Growth management, Urban policy",
author = "Burge, {Gregory S.} and Nelson, {Arthur Christian} and John Matthews",
year = "2007",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "18",
pages = "679--710",
journal = "Housing Policy Debate",
issn = "1051-1482",
publisher = "Taylor Graham Publishing",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Effects of proportionate-share impact fees

AU - Burge, Gregory S.

AU - Nelson, Arthur Christian

AU - Matthews, John

PY - 2007

Y1 - 2007

N2 - When it comes to paying for the significant costs of growth, local governments throughout the United States are usually the first line of financing. Yet because of a variety of factors, existing tax, fee, and interjurisdictional transfer revenues may not be sufficient. Many hundreds (if not thousands) of communities rely in part on proportionate-share impact fees to provide facilities concurrent with the effects of growth. Impact fees have numerous detractors, many of whom worry about their effect on affordable housing, economic development, and development patterns. A disparate literature has emerged addressing each of these concerns. This article synthesizes current knowledge about the market effects of proportionate-share impact fees and finds that for the most part, they facilitate development in several important ways. Policy implications and guidance for future research are presented as well.

AB - When it comes to paying for the significant costs of growth, local governments throughout the United States are usually the first line of financing. Yet because of a variety of factors, existing tax, fee, and interjurisdictional transfer revenues may not be sufficient. Many hundreds (if not thousands) of communities rely in part on proportionate-share impact fees to provide facilities concurrent with the effects of growth. Impact fees have numerous detractors, many of whom worry about their effect on affordable housing, economic development, and development patterns. A disparate literature has emerged addressing each of these concerns. This article synthesizes current knowledge about the market effects of proportionate-share impact fees and finds that for the most part, they facilitate development in several important ways. Policy implications and guidance for future research are presented as well.

KW - Affordability

KW - Growth management

KW - Urban policy

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=46649099675&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=46649099675&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 18

SP - 679

EP - 710

JO - Housing Policy Debate

JF - Housing Policy Debate

SN - 1051-1482

IS - 4

ER -