Effects of psychosocial stress on episodic memory updating

Bhaktee Dongaonkar, Almut Hupbach, Rebecca L Gomez, Lynn Nadel

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

15 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Rationale: When a consolidated memory is reactivated, it becomes labile and modifiable. Recently, updating of reactivated episodic memory was demonstrated by Hupbach et al. (Learn Mem 14:47-53, 2007). Memory updating involves two vital processes - reactivation followed by reconsolidation. Here, we explored effects of psychosocial stress on episodic memory updating. Based on prior research, we hypothesized that stress before reactivation or stress before reconsolidation would impair memory updating. Methods: Participants learned a set of objects (list 1) on day 1. On day 2, some participants were reminded of list 1 before learning a second set of objects (list 2). Memory for list 1 was tested on day 3. Stress was administered either before reactivation of list 1 on day 2 (exp 1) or before reconsolidation of list 1, i.e., after reactivation and learning list 2 on day 2 (exp 2). Results: Memory updating involves the incorporation of list 2 items into list 1 memory, contingent upon the reactivation of list 1 memory. In exp 1, the reminder groups had higher intrusions than the no-reminder groups, but contrary to our predictions, stress did not reduce this reminder effect. Stress effects were, however, found in exp 2: the reminder group that was stressed after reactivation and new learning showed fewer intrusions than the control reminder group. Conclusion: The findings suggest that stress before reactivation does not impair memory updating but stress at the onset of reconsolidation can. Timing may determine the effects of stress on memory processing.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)769-779
Number of pages11
JournalPsychopharmacology
Volume226
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2013

Fingerprint

Episodic Memory
Learning
Control Groups

Keywords

  • Cortisol
  • Episodic
  • Memory updating
  • Reactivation
  • Reconsolidation
  • Stress
  • Timing of stress

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pharmacology

Cite this

Effects of psychosocial stress on episodic memory updating. / Dongaonkar, Bhaktee; Hupbach, Almut; Gomez, Rebecca L; Nadel, Lynn.

In: Psychopharmacology, Vol. 226, No. 4, 04.2013, p. 769-779.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Dongaonkar, Bhaktee ; Hupbach, Almut ; Gomez, Rebecca L ; Nadel, Lynn. / Effects of psychosocial stress on episodic memory updating. In: Psychopharmacology. 2013 ; Vol. 226, No. 4. pp. 769-779.
@article{ac81c820fdb54643a0e5cbf209432950,
title = "Effects of psychosocial stress on episodic memory updating",
abstract = "Rationale: When a consolidated memory is reactivated, it becomes labile and modifiable. Recently, updating of reactivated episodic memory was demonstrated by Hupbach et al. (Learn Mem 14:47-53, 2007). Memory updating involves two vital processes - reactivation followed by reconsolidation. Here, we explored effects of psychosocial stress on episodic memory updating. Based on prior research, we hypothesized that stress before reactivation or stress before reconsolidation would impair memory updating. Methods: Participants learned a set of objects (list 1) on day 1. On day 2, some participants were reminded of list 1 before learning a second set of objects (list 2). Memory for list 1 was tested on day 3. Stress was administered either before reactivation of list 1 on day 2 (exp 1) or before reconsolidation of list 1, i.e., after reactivation and learning list 2 on day 2 (exp 2). Results: Memory updating involves the incorporation of list 2 items into list 1 memory, contingent upon the reactivation of list 1 memory. In exp 1, the reminder groups had higher intrusions than the no-reminder groups, but contrary to our predictions, stress did not reduce this reminder effect. Stress effects were, however, found in exp 2: the reminder group that was stressed after reactivation and new learning showed fewer intrusions than the control reminder group. Conclusion: The findings suggest that stress before reactivation does not impair memory updating but stress at the onset of reconsolidation can. Timing may determine the effects of stress on memory processing.",
keywords = "Cortisol, Episodic, Memory updating, Reactivation, Reconsolidation, Stress, Timing of stress",
author = "Bhaktee Dongaonkar and Almut Hupbach and Gomez, {Rebecca L} and Lynn Nadel",
year = "2013",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1007/s00213-013-2998-8",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "226",
pages = "769--779",
journal = "Psychopharmacology",
issn = "0033-3158",
publisher = "Springer Verlag",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Effects of psychosocial stress on episodic memory updating

AU - Dongaonkar, Bhaktee

AU - Hupbach, Almut

AU - Gomez, Rebecca L

AU - Nadel, Lynn

PY - 2013/4

Y1 - 2013/4

N2 - Rationale: When a consolidated memory is reactivated, it becomes labile and modifiable. Recently, updating of reactivated episodic memory was demonstrated by Hupbach et al. (Learn Mem 14:47-53, 2007). Memory updating involves two vital processes - reactivation followed by reconsolidation. Here, we explored effects of psychosocial stress on episodic memory updating. Based on prior research, we hypothesized that stress before reactivation or stress before reconsolidation would impair memory updating. Methods: Participants learned a set of objects (list 1) on day 1. On day 2, some participants were reminded of list 1 before learning a second set of objects (list 2). Memory for list 1 was tested on day 3. Stress was administered either before reactivation of list 1 on day 2 (exp 1) or before reconsolidation of list 1, i.e., after reactivation and learning list 2 on day 2 (exp 2). Results: Memory updating involves the incorporation of list 2 items into list 1 memory, contingent upon the reactivation of list 1 memory. In exp 1, the reminder groups had higher intrusions than the no-reminder groups, but contrary to our predictions, stress did not reduce this reminder effect. Stress effects were, however, found in exp 2: the reminder group that was stressed after reactivation and new learning showed fewer intrusions than the control reminder group. Conclusion: The findings suggest that stress before reactivation does not impair memory updating but stress at the onset of reconsolidation can. Timing may determine the effects of stress on memory processing.

AB - Rationale: When a consolidated memory is reactivated, it becomes labile and modifiable. Recently, updating of reactivated episodic memory was demonstrated by Hupbach et al. (Learn Mem 14:47-53, 2007). Memory updating involves two vital processes - reactivation followed by reconsolidation. Here, we explored effects of psychosocial stress on episodic memory updating. Based on prior research, we hypothesized that stress before reactivation or stress before reconsolidation would impair memory updating. Methods: Participants learned a set of objects (list 1) on day 1. On day 2, some participants were reminded of list 1 before learning a second set of objects (list 2). Memory for list 1 was tested on day 3. Stress was administered either before reactivation of list 1 on day 2 (exp 1) or before reconsolidation of list 1, i.e., after reactivation and learning list 2 on day 2 (exp 2). Results: Memory updating involves the incorporation of list 2 items into list 1 memory, contingent upon the reactivation of list 1 memory. In exp 1, the reminder groups had higher intrusions than the no-reminder groups, but contrary to our predictions, stress did not reduce this reminder effect. Stress effects were, however, found in exp 2: the reminder group that was stressed after reactivation and new learning showed fewer intrusions than the control reminder group. Conclusion: The findings suggest that stress before reactivation does not impair memory updating but stress at the onset of reconsolidation can. Timing may determine the effects of stress on memory processing.

KW - Cortisol

KW - Episodic

KW - Memory updating

KW - Reactivation

KW - Reconsolidation

KW - Stress

KW - Timing of stress

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84876476901&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84876476901&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s00213-013-2998-8

DO - 10.1007/s00213-013-2998-8

M3 - Article

C2 - 23404063

AN - SCOPUS:84876476901

VL - 226

SP - 769

EP - 779

JO - Psychopharmacology

JF - Psychopharmacology

SN - 0033-3158

IS - 4

ER -