Effects of pulse duration on neuromuscular blockade monitoring: Implications for supramaximal stimulation

P. A. Pierce, K. C. Mylrea, R. C. Watt, Stuart R Hameroff, R. V. Cork, J. M. Calkins

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Questions have been raised concerning the reliability of surface electrodes in achieving supramaximal stimulation during the monitoring of neuromuscular blockade; needle electrodes are considered reliable in this respect. This study compares interelectrode impedances of needle and surface electrodes during neuromuscular blockade monitoring and suggests those characteristics of the stimulation pulse that can ensure reliable supramaximal stimulation with either type of electrode. Interelectrode voltage and current for surface and needle electrodes were measured by using 1.0-ms pulses at low, medium, and high stimulation levels on 22 surgical patients during anesthesia. Data were collected immediately after electrode application, and again at 10 minutes after application. Stimulation with surface electrodes produced an initial, transient surge of current, followed by a lower steady-state value. At high stimulation levels, the peak transient current was 87% higher than the steady-state current. Needle electrodes produced a constant high-current response. At high stimulation levels the transient impedance of the surface electrode and the impedance of the needle electrode were essentially equal (0.7 kΩ and 0.75 kΩ, respectively). The transient impedance was significantly lower (P<0.001) and was associated with less interpatient variation (P<0.001) and less sensitivity to the duration of electrode application than was the steady-state impedance of the surface electrode. These data suggest that high-current pulses with widths of less than 0.2 ms could provide reliable supramaximal stimulation with either type of electrode.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)169-173
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Clinical Monitoring
Volume2
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1986

Fingerprint

Neuromuscular Monitoring
Electrodes
Electric Impedance
Needles

Keywords

  • electrodes
  • Equipment
  • interelectrode impedance
  • Measurement techniques
  • Monitoring
  • neuromuscular blockade
  • peripheral nerve stimulation
  • peripheral nerve stimulators
  • supramaximal stimulation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine

Cite this

Effects of pulse duration on neuromuscular blockade monitoring : Implications for supramaximal stimulation. / Pierce, P. A.; Mylrea, K. C.; Watt, R. C.; Hameroff, Stuart R; Cork, R. V.; Calkins, J. M.

In: Journal of Clinical Monitoring, Vol. 2, No. 3, 07.1986, p. 169-173.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Pierce, P. A. ; Mylrea, K. C. ; Watt, R. C. ; Hameroff, Stuart R ; Cork, R. V. ; Calkins, J. M. / Effects of pulse duration on neuromuscular blockade monitoring : Implications for supramaximal stimulation. In: Journal of Clinical Monitoring. 1986 ; Vol. 2, No. 3. pp. 169-173.
@article{164b7a2d43e34faca78f72c896f3f7ae,
title = "Effects of pulse duration on neuromuscular blockade monitoring: Implications for supramaximal stimulation",
abstract = "Questions have been raised concerning the reliability of surface electrodes in achieving supramaximal stimulation during the monitoring of neuromuscular blockade; needle electrodes are considered reliable in this respect. This study compares interelectrode impedances of needle and surface electrodes during neuromuscular blockade monitoring and suggests those characteristics of the stimulation pulse that can ensure reliable supramaximal stimulation with either type of electrode. Interelectrode voltage and current for surface and needle electrodes were measured by using 1.0-ms pulses at low, medium, and high stimulation levels on 22 surgical patients during anesthesia. Data were collected immediately after electrode application, and again at 10 minutes after application. Stimulation with surface electrodes produced an initial, transient surge of current, followed by a lower steady-state value. At high stimulation levels, the peak transient current was 87{\%} higher than the steady-state current. Needle electrodes produced a constant high-current response. At high stimulation levels the transient impedance of the surface electrode and the impedance of the needle electrode were essentially equal (0.7 kΩ and 0.75 kΩ, respectively). The transient impedance was significantly lower (P<0.001) and was associated with less interpatient variation (P<0.001) and less sensitivity to the duration of electrode application than was the steady-state impedance of the surface electrode. These data suggest that high-current pulses with widths of less than 0.2 ms could provide reliable supramaximal stimulation with either type of electrode.",
keywords = "electrodes, Equipment, interelectrode impedance, Measurement techniques, Monitoring, neuromuscular blockade, peripheral nerve stimulation, peripheral nerve stimulators, supramaximal stimulation",
author = "Pierce, {P. A.} and Mylrea, {K. C.} and Watt, {R. C.} and Hameroff, {Stuart R} and Cork, {R. V.} and Calkins, {J. M.}",
year = "1986",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1007/BF01620549",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "2",
pages = "169--173",
journal = "Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing",
issn = "1387-1307",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Effects of pulse duration on neuromuscular blockade monitoring

T2 - Implications for supramaximal stimulation

AU - Pierce, P. A.

AU - Mylrea, K. C.

AU - Watt, R. C.

AU - Hameroff, Stuart R

AU - Cork, R. V.

AU - Calkins, J. M.

PY - 1986/7

Y1 - 1986/7

N2 - Questions have been raised concerning the reliability of surface electrodes in achieving supramaximal stimulation during the monitoring of neuromuscular blockade; needle electrodes are considered reliable in this respect. This study compares interelectrode impedances of needle and surface electrodes during neuromuscular blockade monitoring and suggests those characteristics of the stimulation pulse that can ensure reliable supramaximal stimulation with either type of electrode. Interelectrode voltage and current for surface and needle electrodes were measured by using 1.0-ms pulses at low, medium, and high stimulation levels on 22 surgical patients during anesthesia. Data were collected immediately after electrode application, and again at 10 minutes after application. Stimulation with surface electrodes produced an initial, transient surge of current, followed by a lower steady-state value. At high stimulation levels, the peak transient current was 87% higher than the steady-state current. Needle electrodes produced a constant high-current response. At high stimulation levels the transient impedance of the surface electrode and the impedance of the needle electrode were essentially equal (0.7 kΩ and 0.75 kΩ, respectively). The transient impedance was significantly lower (P<0.001) and was associated with less interpatient variation (P<0.001) and less sensitivity to the duration of electrode application than was the steady-state impedance of the surface electrode. These data suggest that high-current pulses with widths of less than 0.2 ms could provide reliable supramaximal stimulation with either type of electrode.

AB - Questions have been raised concerning the reliability of surface electrodes in achieving supramaximal stimulation during the monitoring of neuromuscular blockade; needle electrodes are considered reliable in this respect. This study compares interelectrode impedances of needle and surface electrodes during neuromuscular blockade monitoring and suggests those characteristics of the stimulation pulse that can ensure reliable supramaximal stimulation with either type of electrode. Interelectrode voltage and current for surface and needle electrodes were measured by using 1.0-ms pulses at low, medium, and high stimulation levels on 22 surgical patients during anesthesia. Data were collected immediately after electrode application, and again at 10 minutes after application. Stimulation with surface electrodes produced an initial, transient surge of current, followed by a lower steady-state value. At high stimulation levels, the peak transient current was 87% higher than the steady-state current. Needle electrodes produced a constant high-current response. At high stimulation levels the transient impedance of the surface electrode and the impedance of the needle electrode were essentially equal (0.7 kΩ and 0.75 kΩ, respectively). The transient impedance was significantly lower (P<0.001) and was associated with less interpatient variation (P<0.001) and less sensitivity to the duration of electrode application than was the steady-state impedance of the surface electrode. These data suggest that high-current pulses with widths of less than 0.2 ms could provide reliable supramaximal stimulation with either type of electrode.

KW - electrodes

KW - Equipment

KW - interelectrode impedance

KW - Measurement techniques

KW - Monitoring

KW - neuromuscular blockade

KW - peripheral nerve stimulation

KW - peripheral nerve stimulators

KW - supramaximal stimulation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0022508051&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0022508051&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/BF01620549

DO - 10.1007/BF01620549

M3 - Article

C2 - 3489078

AN - SCOPUS:0022508051

VL - 2

SP - 169

EP - 173

JO - Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing

JF - Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing

SN - 1387-1307

IS - 3

ER -