Effects of three landscape treatments on residential energy and water use in Tucson, Arizona

E. Gregory McPherson, James R. Simpson, Margaret Livingston

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

51 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Vegetation can reduce the cooling loads of buildings in hot arid climates by modifying air temperature, solar heat gain, longwave heat gain, and heat loss by convection. However, savings from reduced mechanical cooling may be offset by increased irrigation water costs. In this study, three similar 1 4-scale model buildings were constructed and surrounded with different landscapes: turf, rock mulch with a foundation planting of shrubs, and rock mulch with no plants. Irrigation water use and electricity required to power the three room-sized air conditioners and interior lights were measured for two approximately week-long periods. Electrical energy consumed for air-conditioning by the rock model was 20 - 30% more than for the turf and shade models. Factors accounting for these differences in energy performance include dense shade that substantially reduced solar heat gain for the shaded model, a 16% difference in longwave radiation flux between the rock and turf treatments, and a maximum drybulb depression of 4 °C over the turf compared with the rock. Air-conditioning savings exceeded water costs for shade treatments that were simulated to receive moderate and low amounts of irrigation water. These preliminary findings suggest that the localized effects of vegetation on building microclimate may be more significant than boundary layer effects in hot arid regions.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)127-138
Number of pages12
JournalEnergy and Buildings
Volume13
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 14 1989

Fingerprint

Rocks
Irrigation
Water
Air conditioning
Cooling
Arid regions
Air
Heat losses
Costs
Loads (forces)
Boundary layers
Electricity
Fluxes
Radiation
Hot Temperature
Temperature

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
  • Civil and Structural Engineering

Cite this

Effects of three landscape treatments on residential energy and water use in Tucson, Arizona. / McPherson, E. Gregory; Simpson, James R.; Livingston, Margaret.

In: Energy and Buildings, Vol. 13, No. 2, 14.04.1989, p. 127-138.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{25f91cc2337b428c999d0b8224cbe24a,
title = "Effects of three landscape treatments on residential energy and water use in Tucson, Arizona",
abstract = "Vegetation can reduce the cooling loads of buildings in hot arid climates by modifying air temperature, solar heat gain, longwave heat gain, and heat loss by convection. However, savings from reduced mechanical cooling may be offset by increased irrigation water costs. In this study, three similar 1 4-scale model buildings were constructed and surrounded with different landscapes: turf, rock mulch with a foundation planting of shrubs, and rock mulch with no plants. Irrigation water use and electricity required to power the three room-sized air conditioners and interior lights were measured for two approximately week-long periods. Electrical energy consumed for air-conditioning by the rock model was 20 - 30{\%} more than for the turf and shade models. Factors accounting for these differences in energy performance include dense shade that substantially reduced solar heat gain for the shaded model, a 16{\%} difference in longwave radiation flux between the rock and turf treatments, and a maximum drybulb depression of 4 °C over the turf compared with the rock. Air-conditioning savings exceeded water costs for shade treatments that were simulated to receive moderate and low amounts of irrigation water. These preliminary findings suggest that the localized effects of vegetation on building microclimate may be more significant than boundary layer effects in hot arid regions.",
author = "McPherson, {E. Gregory} and Simpson, {James R.} and Margaret Livingston",
year = "1989",
month = "4",
day = "14",
doi = "10.1016/0378-7788(89)90004-2",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "13",
pages = "127--138",
journal = "Energy and Buildings",
issn = "0378-7788",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Effects of three landscape treatments on residential energy and water use in Tucson, Arizona

AU - McPherson, E. Gregory

AU - Simpson, James R.

AU - Livingston, Margaret

PY - 1989/4/14

Y1 - 1989/4/14

N2 - Vegetation can reduce the cooling loads of buildings in hot arid climates by modifying air temperature, solar heat gain, longwave heat gain, and heat loss by convection. However, savings from reduced mechanical cooling may be offset by increased irrigation water costs. In this study, three similar 1 4-scale model buildings were constructed and surrounded with different landscapes: turf, rock mulch with a foundation planting of shrubs, and rock mulch with no plants. Irrigation water use and electricity required to power the three room-sized air conditioners and interior lights were measured for two approximately week-long periods. Electrical energy consumed for air-conditioning by the rock model was 20 - 30% more than for the turf and shade models. Factors accounting for these differences in energy performance include dense shade that substantially reduced solar heat gain for the shaded model, a 16% difference in longwave radiation flux between the rock and turf treatments, and a maximum drybulb depression of 4 °C over the turf compared with the rock. Air-conditioning savings exceeded water costs for shade treatments that were simulated to receive moderate and low amounts of irrigation water. These preliminary findings suggest that the localized effects of vegetation on building microclimate may be more significant than boundary layer effects in hot arid regions.

AB - Vegetation can reduce the cooling loads of buildings in hot arid climates by modifying air temperature, solar heat gain, longwave heat gain, and heat loss by convection. However, savings from reduced mechanical cooling may be offset by increased irrigation water costs. In this study, three similar 1 4-scale model buildings were constructed and surrounded with different landscapes: turf, rock mulch with a foundation planting of shrubs, and rock mulch with no plants. Irrigation water use and electricity required to power the three room-sized air conditioners and interior lights were measured for two approximately week-long periods. Electrical energy consumed for air-conditioning by the rock model was 20 - 30% more than for the turf and shade models. Factors accounting for these differences in energy performance include dense shade that substantially reduced solar heat gain for the shaded model, a 16% difference in longwave radiation flux between the rock and turf treatments, and a maximum drybulb depression of 4 °C over the turf compared with the rock. Air-conditioning savings exceeded water costs for shade treatments that were simulated to receive moderate and low amounts of irrigation water. These preliminary findings suggest that the localized effects of vegetation on building microclimate may be more significant than boundary layer effects in hot arid regions.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0024640754&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0024640754&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/0378-7788(89)90004-2

DO - 10.1016/0378-7788(89)90004-2

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0024640754

VL - 13

SP - 127

EP - 138

JO - Energy and Buildings

JF - Energy and Buildings

SN - 0378-7788

IS - 2

ER -