Effects of varying approaches for identifying respiratory disturbances on sleep apnea assessment

Susan Redline, Vishesh K. Kapur, Mark H. Sanders, Stuart F. Quan, Daniel J. Gottlieb, David M. Rapoport, William H. Bonekat, Philip L. Smith, James P. Kiley, Conrad Iber

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

172 Scopus citations

Abstract

Varying approaches to measuring the respiratory disturbance index (RDI) may lead to discrepant estimates of the severity of sleep-disordered breathing (SDB). In this study, we assessed the impact of varying the use of corroborative data (presence and degree of desaturation and/or arousal) to identify hypopneas and apneas. The relationships among 10 RDIs defined by various definitions of apneas and hypopneas were assessed in 5,046 participants in the Sleep Heart Health Study (SHHS) who underwent overnight unattended 12-channel polysomnography (PSG). The magnitude of the median RDI varied 10-fold (i.e., 29.3 when the RDI was based on events identified on the basis of flow or volume amplitude criteria alone to 2.0 for an RDI that required an associated 5% desaturation with events). The correlation between RDIs based on different definitions ranged from 0.99 to 0.68. The highest correlations were among RDIs that required apneas and hypopneas to be associated with some level of desaturation. Lower correlations were observed between RDIs that required desaturation as compared with RDIs defined on the basis of amplitude criteria alone or associated arousal. These data suggest that different approaches for measuring the RDI may contribute to substantial variability in identification and classification of the disorder.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)369-374
Number of pages6
JournalAmerican journal of respiratory and critical care medicine
Volume161
Issue number2 I
DOIs
StatePublished - 2000

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Effects of varying approaches for identifying respiratory disturbances on sleep apnea assessment'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this