Effects of verb bias and syntactic ambiguity on reading in people with aphasia

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: The Lexical Bias Hypothesis claims that people with aphasia (PWA) have difficulty understanding sentences when the verb's argument structure bias conflicts with the sentence structure. This hypothesis can account for comprehension deficits that affect simple sentences, but the role of verb bias has not been clearly demonstrated in temporarily ambiguous sentences.Aims: This study examined how verb bias affects comprehension of temporarily ambiguous and unambiguous sentences using self-paced reading.Methods & Procedures: PWA and controls read sentences that contained sentential complements (e.g., The talented photographer accepted (that) the fire could not have been prevented). The main verb was biased to take a direct object (e.g., accepted) or a sentential complement (e.g., admitted). In addition, the sentential complement was either introduced by the complementiser that (i.e., unambiguous) or unmarked (i.e., ambiguous).Results: The reading times of PWA were affected more by verb bias than by the presence of the complementiser, whereas the control group's reading times were more affected by the presence or absence of the complementiser.Conclusions: The results were generally consistent with the Lexical Bias Hypothesis, and showed that a mismatch between verb bias and sentence structure affected the processing of unambiguous and temporarily ambiguous sentences in PWA.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1408-1425
Number of pages18
JournalAphasiology
Volume27
Issue number12
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2013

Fingerprint

Aphasia
speech disorder
photographer
Reading
trend
comprehension
Control Groups
Syntactic Ambiguity
Verb Bias
mismatch
deficit
Complementizer
Reading Time
Lexical Bias

Keywords

  • Aphasia
  • Lexical Bias Hypothesis
  • Reading comprehension
  • Temporary syntactic ambiguity

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Developmental and Educational Psychology
  • Linguistics and Language
  • Language and Linguistics
  • Otorhinolaryngology
  • LPN and LVN
  • Neurology
  • Clinical Neurology

Cite this

Effects of verb bias and syntactic ambiguity on reading in people with aphasia. / DeDe, Gayle L.

In: Aphasiology, Vol. 27, No. 12, 12.2013, p. 1408-1425.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{6f00e65f97b14a4b89a8436c6f9f8051,
title = "Effects of verb bias and syntactic ambiguity on reading in people with aphasia",
abstract = "Background: The Lexical Bias Hypothesis claims that people with aphasia (PWA) have difficulty understanding sentences when the verb's argument structure bias conflicts with the sentence structure. This hypothesis can account for comprehension deficits that affect simple sentences, but the role of verb bias has not been clearly demonstrated in temporarily ambiguous sentences.Aims: This study examined how verb bias affects comprehension of temporarily ambiguous and unambiguous sentences using self-paced reading.Methods & Procedures: PWA and controls read sentences that contained sentential complements (e.g., The talented photographer accepted (that) the fire could not have been prevented). The main verb was biased to take a direct object (e.g., accepted) or a sentential complement (e.g., admitted). In addition, the sentential complement was either introduced by the complementiser that (i.e., unambiguous) or unmarked (i.e., ambiguous).Results: The reading times of PWA were affected more by verb bias than by the presence of the complementiser, whereas the control group's reading times were more affected by the presence or absence of the complementiser.Conclusions: The results were generally consistent with the Lexical Bias Hypothesis, and showed that a mismatch between verb bias and sentence structure affected the processing of unambiguous and temporarily ambiguous sentences in PWA.",
keywords = "Aphasia, Lexical Bias Hypothesis, Reading comprehension, Temporary syntactic ambiguity",
author = "DeDe, {Gayle L}",
year = "2013",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1080/02687038.2013.843151",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "27",
pages = "1408--1425",
journal = "Aphasiology",
issn = "0268-7038",
publisher = "Psychology Press Ltd",
number = "12",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Effects of verb bias and syntactic ambiguity on reading in people with aphasia

AU - DeDe, Gayle L

PY - 2013/12

Y1 - 2013/12

N2 - Background: The Lexical Bias Hypothesis claims that people with aphasia (PWA) have difficulty understanding sentences when the verb's argument structure bias conflicts with the sentence structure. This hypothesis can account for comprehension deficits that affect simple sentences, but the role of verb bias has not been clearly demonstrated in temporarily ambiguous sentences.Aims: This study examined how verb bias affects comprehension of temporarily ambiguous and unambiguous sentences using self-paced reading.Methods & Procedures: PWA and controls read sentences that contained sentential complements (e.g., The talented photographer accepted (that) the fire could not have been prevented). The main verb was biased to take a direct object (e.g., accepted) or a sentential complement (e.g., admitted). In addition, the sentential complement was either introduced by the complementiser that (i.e., unambiguous) or unmarked (i.e., ambiguous).Results: The reading times of PWA were affected more by verb bias than by the presence of the complementiser, whereas the control group's reading times were more affected by the presence or absence of the complementiser.Conclusions: The results were generally consistent with the Lexical Bias Hypothesis, and showed that a mismatch between verb bias and sentence structure affected the processing of unambiguous and temporarily ambiguous sentences in PWA.

AB - Background: The Lexical Bias Hypothesis claims that people with aphasia (PWA) have difficulty understanding sentences when the verb's argument structure bias conflicts with the sentence structure. This hypothesis can account for comprehension deficits that affect simple sentences, but the role of verb bias has not been clearly demonstrated in temporarily ambiguous sentences.Aims: This study examined how verb bias affects comprehension of temporarily ambiguous and unambiguous sentences using self-paced reading.Methods & Procedures: PWA and controls read sentences that contained sentential complements (e.g., The talented photographer accepted (that) the fire could not have been prevented). The main verb was biased to take a direct object (e.g., accepted) or a sentential complement (e.g., admitted). In addition, the sentential complement was either introduced by the complementiser that (i.e., unambiguous) or unmarked (i.e., ambiguous).Results: The reading times of PWA were affected more by verb bias than by the presence of the complementiser, whereas the control group's reading times were more affected by the presence or absence of the complementiser.Conclusions: The results were generally consistent with the Lexical Bias Hypothesis, and showed that a mismatch between verb bias and sentence structure affected the processing of unambiguous and temporarily ambiguous sentences in PWA.

KW - Aphasia

KW - Lexical Bias Hypothesis

KW - Reading comprehension

KW - Temporary syntactic ambiguity

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84886380764&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84886380764&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/02687038.2013.843151

DO - 10.1080/02687038.2013.843151

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84886380764

VL - 27

SP - 1408

EP - 1425

JO - Aphasiology

JF - Aphasiology

SN - 0268-7038

IS - 12

ER -