Efficacy of low-stress herding and low-moisture block to target cattle grazing locations on New Mexico rangelands

Mitchell B. Stephenson, Derek W. Bailey, Larry D. Howery, Leticia Henderson

Research output: Research - peer-reviewArticle

  • 1 Citations

Abstract

Efficacy of low-stress herding (LSH) and strategic placement of low-moisture block (LMB) protein supplement was evaluated to target cattle grazing on underutilized areas of extensive and rugged rangelands in south central New Mexico. Global positioning system-tracked cattle spent more time (P <0.01) on target areas (6.9 ± 0.6 h d-1) than non-target areas (0.5 ± 0.6 h d-1) when LSH and LMB treatments were applied. Mean distance from target areas was reduced (P <0.05) by over 1 km and cattle spent less time within 100 m of water with LSH and LMB treatments compared to a free-roaming period before the treatments. Targeted cattle grazing treatments reduced current year, dormant perennial grass standing crop on target areas, but no differences were detected in the reduction in standing crop between target and non-target areas within the study pastures. Height-weight curve utilization estimates indicated that utilization was greater (P = 0.03) on target areas (15.2 ± 2.9%) compared to non-target areas (5.8 ± 2.2%). Overall, low-stress herding and LMB were effective tools to focus cattle grazing, but fencing may be required if greater utilization within target areas is desired.

LanguageEnglish (US)
Pages84-93
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Arid Environments
Volume130
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1 2016

Fingerprint

herding
rangelands
grazing
cattle
rangeland
moisture
crops
biomass
global positioning systems
protein supplements
pastures
grasses
water
pasture
GPS
grass
protein

Keywords

  • Fine fuels
  • Grazing behavior
  • Livestock distribution
  • Targeted grazing

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
  • Earth-Surface Processes
  • Ecology

Cite this

Efficacy of low-stress herding and low-moisture block to target cattle grazing locations on New Mexico rangelands. / Stephenson, Mitchell B.; Bailey, Derek W.; Howery, Larry D.; Henderson, Leticia.

In: Journal of Arid Environments, Vol. 130, 01.07.2016, p. 84-93.

Research output: Research - peer-reviewArticle

@article{fa8ff3fd993e43b498312cce31f92f08,
title = "Efficacy of low-stress herding and low-moisture block to target cattle grazing locations on New Mexico rangelands",
abstract = "Efficacy of low-stress herding (LSH) and strategic placement of low-moisture block (LMB) protein supplement was evaluated to target cattle grazing on underutilized areas of extensive and rugged rangelands in south central New Mexico. Global positioning system-tracked cattle spent more time (P <0.01) on target areas (6.9 ± 0.6 h d-1) than non-target areas (0.5 ± 0.6 h d-1) when LSH and LMB treatments were applied. Mean distance from target areas was reduced (P <0.05) by over 1 km and cattle spent less time within 100 m of water with LSH and LMB treatments compared to a free-roaming period before the treatments. Targeted cattle grazing treatments reduced current year, dormant perennial grass standing crop on target areas, but no differences were detected in the reduction in standing crop between target and non-target areas within the study pastures. Height-weight curve utilization estimates indicated that utilization was greater (P = 0.03) on target areas (15.2 ± 2.9%) compared to non-target areas (5.8 ± 2.2%). Overall, low-stress herding and LMB were effective tools to focus cattle grazing, but fencing may be required if greater utilization within target areas is desired.",
keywords = "Fine fuels, Grazing behavior, Livestock distribution, Targeted grazing",
author = "Stephenson, {Mitchell B.} and Bailey, {Derek W.} and Howery, {Larry D.} and Leticia Henderson",
year = "2016",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1016/j.jaridenv.2016.03.012",
volume = "130",
pages = "84--93",
journal = "Journal of Arid Environments",
issn = "0140-1963",
publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Efficacy of low-stress herding and low-moisture block to target cattle grazing locations on New Mexico rangelands

AU - Stephenson,Mitchell B.

AU - Bailey,Derek W.

AU - Howery,Larry D.

AU - Henderson,Leticia

PY - 2016/7/1

Y1 - 2016/7/1

N2 - Efficacy of low-stress herding (LSH) and strategic placement of low-moisture block (LMB) protein supplement was evaluated to target cattle grazing on underutilized areas of extensive and rugged rangelands in south central New Mexico. Global positioning system-tracked cattle spent more time (P <0.01) on target areas (6.9 ± 0.6 h d-1) than non-target areas (0.5 ± 0.6 h d-1) when LSH and LMB treatments were applied. Mean distance from target areas was reduced (P <0.05) by over 1 km and cattle spent less time within 100 m of water with LSH and LMB treatments compared to a free-roaming period before the treatments. Targeted cattle grazing treatments reduced current year, dormant perennial grass standing crop on target areas, but no differences were detected in the reduction in standing crop between target and non-target areas within the study pastures. Height-weight curve utilization estimates indicated that utilization was greater (P = 0.03) on target areas (15.2 ± 2.9%) compared to non-target areas (5.8 ± 2.2%). Overall, low-stress herding and LMB were effective tools to focus cattle grazing, but fencing may be required if greater utilization within target areas is desired.

AB - Efficacy of low-stress herding (LSH) and strategic placement of low-moisture block (LMB) protein supplement was evaluated to target cattle grazing on underutilized areas of extensive and rugged rangelands in south central New Mexico. Global positioning system-tracked cattle spent more time (P <0.01) on target areas (6.9 ± 0.6 h d-1) than non-target areas (0.5 ± 0.6 h d-1) when LSH and LMB treatments were applied. Mean distance from target areas was reduced (P <0.05) by over 1 km and cattle spent less time within 100 m of water with LSH and LMB treatments compared to a free-roaming period before the treatments. Targeted cattle grazing treatments reduced current year, dormant perennial grass standing crop on target areas, but no differences were detected in the reduction in standing crop between target and non-target areas within the study pastures. Height-weight curve utilization estimates indicated that utilization was greater (P = 0.03) on target areas (15.2 ± 2.9%) compared to non-target areas (5.8 ± 2.2%). Overall, low-stress herding and LMB were effective tools to focus cattle grazing, but fencing may be required if greater utilization within target areas is desired.

KW - Fine fuels

KW - Grazing behavior

KW - Livestock distribution

KW - Targeted grazing

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84962279088&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84962279088&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jaridenv.2016.03.012

DO - 10.1016/j.jaridenv.2016.03.012

M3 - Article

VL - 130

SP - 84

EP - 93

JO - Journal of Arid Environments

T2 - Journal of Arid Environments

JF - Journal of Arid Environments

SN - 0140-1963

ER -