Elective Thoracic Aortic Aneurysm Surgery: Better Outcomes from High-Volume Centers

Leo M. Gazoni, Alan M. Speir, Irving L. Kron, Edward Fonner, Ivan K. Crosby

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

23 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Although studies have demonstrated clinical advantages in high-volume (HV) centers performing esophageal and pancreatic resections, thoracic aortic aneurysm repair has not been studied in the same fashion. We sought to determine if HV centers have better outcomes after thoracic aortic aneurysm surgery relative to lower-volume (LV) centers. Study Design: Retrospective review of prospectively collected data pooled from the 17 institutions participating in the Virginia Cardiac Surgery Quality Initiative (VCSQI) database was performed during a 3-year period. LV centers were those that performed <40 operations during the study period, and HV centers were those that performed >80 operations. Preoperative risk factors and outcomes were compared between the 2 groups. Multivariate analysis was performed to evaluate the impact of center volume on mortality. Only elective operations were studied. Results: HV centers performed 515 operations during the study period compared with 216 operations from LV centers. Perioperative mortality was significantly lower in HV centers (3.7%, n = 19) versus LV centers (8.3%, n = 18) (p = 0.02). Incidence of renal failure (HV: 4.5%; LV: 8.3%; p = 0.05) and prolonged ventilator course (HV: 16.7%; LV: 25.5%; p = 0.01) were also lower in the HV centers relative to LV centers. HV centers had higher stroke rates compared with LV centers (HV: 4.8%, LV: 1.4%; p < 0.01). Total hospital cost was $42,736 in HV centers and $51,296 in LV centers (p = 0.04). On regression analysis, LV centers were significantly associated with increased complications and mortality (all p < 0.05). Conclusions: Although LV centers had lower stroke rates, HV centers had overall better outcomes, lower mortality rates, and considerably lower cost compared with LV centers.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)855-859
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of the American College of Surgeons
Volume210
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - May 1 2010
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Thoracic Aortic Aneurysm
Mortality
Stroke
Hospital Costs
Mechanical Ventilators
Thoracic Surgery
Renal Insufficiency
Multivariate Analysis
Retrospective Studies
Regression Analysis
Databases
Costs and Cost Analysis
Incidence

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Elective Thoracic Aortic Aneurysm Surgery : Better Outcomes from High-Volume Centers. / Gazoni, Leo M.; Speir, Alan M.; Kron, Irving L.; Fonner, Edward; Crosby, Ivan K.

In: Journal of the American College of Surgeons, Vol. 210, No. 5, 01.05.2010, p. 855-859.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Gazoni, Leo M. ; Speir, Alan M. ; Kron, Irving L. ; Fonner, Edward ; Crosby, Ivan K. / Elective Thoracic Aortic Aneurysm Surgery : Better Outcomes from High-Volume Centers. In: Journal of the American College of Surgeons. 2010 ; Vol. 210, No. 5. pp. 855-859.
@article{ce669b7efae7454892c9ee1bfca0facf,
title = "Elective Thoracic Aortic Aneurysm Surgery: Better Outcomes from High-Volume Centers",
abstract = "Background: Although studies have demonstrated clinical advantages in high-volume (HV) centers performing esophageal and pancreatic resections, thoracic aortic aneurysm repair has not been studied in the same fashion. We sought to determine if HV centers have better outcomes after thoracic aortic aneurysm surgery relative to lower-volume (LV) centers. Study Design: Retrospective review of prospectively collected data pooled from the 17 institutions participating in the Virginia Cardiac Surgery Quality Initiative (VCSQI) database was performed during a 3-year period. LV centers were those that performed <40 operations during the study period, and HV centers were those that performed >80 operations. Preoperative risk factors and outcomes were compared between the 2 groups. Multivariate analysis was performed to evaluate the impact of center volume on mortality. Only elective operations were studied. Results: HV centers performed 515 operations during the study period compared with 216 operations from LV centers. Perioperative mortality was significantly lower in HV centers (3.7{\%}, n = 19) versus LV centers (8.3{\%}, n = 18) (p = 0.02). Incidence of renal failure (HV: 4.5{\%}; LV: 8.3{\%}; p = 0.05) and prolonged ventilator course (HV: 16.7{\%}; LV: 25.5{\%}; p = 0.01) were also lower in the HV centers relative to LV centers. HV centers had higher stroke rates compared with LV centers (HV: 4.8{\%}, LV: 1.4{\%}; p < 0.01). Total hospital cost was $42,736 in HV centers and $51,296 in LV centers (p = 0.04). On regression analysis, LV centers were significantly associated with increased complications and mortality (all p < 0.05). Conclusions: Although LV centers had lower stroke rates, HV centers had overall better outcomes, lower mortality rates, and considerably lower cost compared with LV centers.",
author = "Gazoni, {Leo M.} and Speir, {Alan M.} and Kron, {Irving L.} and Edward Fonner and Crosby, {Ivan K.}",
year = "2010",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2010.01.013",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "210",
pages = "855--859",
journal = "Journal of the American College of Surgeons",
issn = "1072-7515",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Elective Thoracic Aortic Aneurysm Surgery

T2 - Better Outcomes from High-Volume Centers

AU - Gazoni, Leo M.

AU - Speir, Alan M.

AU - Kron, Irving L.

AU - Fonner, Edward

AU - Crosby, Ivan K.

PY - 2010/5/1

Y1 - 2010/5/1

N2 - Background: Although studies have demonstrated clinical advantages in high-volume (HV) centers performing esophageal and pancreatic resections, thoracic aortic aneurysm repair has not been studied in the same fashion. We sought to determine if HV centers have better outcomes after thoracic aortic aneurysm surgery relative to lower-volume (LV) centers. Study Design: Retrospective review of prospectively collected data pooled from the 17 institutions participating in the Virginia Cardiac Surgery Quality Initiative (VCSQI) database was performed during a 3-year period. LV centers were those that performed <40 operations during the study period, and HV centers were those that performed >80 operations. Preoperative risk factors and outcomes were compared between the 2 groups. Multivariate analysis was performed to evaluate the impact of center volume on mortality. Only elective operations were studied. Results: HV centers performed 515 operations during the study period compared with 216 operations from LV centers. Perioperative mortality was significantly lower in HV centers (3.7%, n = 19) versus LV centers (8.3%, n = 18) (p = 0.02). Incidence of renal failure (HV: 4.5%; LV: 8.3%; p = 0.05) and prolonged ventilator course (HV: 16.7%; LV: 25.5%; p = 0.01) were also lower in the HV centers relative to LV centers. HV centers had higher stroke rates compared with LV centers (HV: 4.8%, LV: 1.4%; p < 0.01). Total hospital cost was $42,736 in HV centers and $51,296 in LV centers (p = 0.04). On regression analysis, LV centers were significantly associated with increased complications and mortality (all p < 0.05). Conclusions: Although LV centers had lower stroke rates, HV centers had overall better outcomes, lower mortality rates, and considerably lower cost compared with LV centers.

AB - Background: Although studies have demonstrated clinical advantages in high-volume (HV) centers performing esophageal and pancreatic resections, thoracic aortic aneurysm repair has not been studied in the same fashion. We sought to determine if HV centers have better outcomes after thoracic aortic aneurysm surgery relative to lower-volume (LV) centers. Study Design: Retrospective review of prospectively collected data pooled from the 17 institutions participating in the Virginia Cardiac Surgery Quality Initiative (VCSQI) database was performed during a 3-year period. LV centers were those that performed <40 operations during the study period, and HV centers were those that performed >80 operations. Preoperative risk factors and outcomes were compared between the 2 groups. Multivariate analysis was performed to evaluate the impact of center volume on mortality. Only elective operations were studied. Results: HV centers performed 515 operations during the study period compared with 216 operations from LV centers. Perioperative mortality was significantly lower in HV centers (3.7%, n = 19) versus LV centers (8.3%, n = 18) (p = 0.02). Incidence of renal failure (HV: 4.5%; LV: 8.3%; p = 0.05) and prolonged ventilator course (HV: 16.7%; LV: 25.5%; p = 0.01) were also lower in the HV centers relative to LV centers. HV centers had higher stroke rates compared with LV centers (HV: 4.8%, LV: 1.4%; p < 0.01). Total hospital cost was $42,736 in HV centers and $51,296 in LV centers (p = 0.04). On regression analysis, LV centers were significantly associated with increased complications and mortality (all p < 0.05). Conclusions: Although LV centers had lower stroke rates, HV centers had overall better outcomes, lower mortality rates, and considerably lower cost compared with LV centers.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77952312300&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77952312300&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2010.01.013

DO - 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2010.01.013

M3 - Article

C2 - 20421065

AN - SCOPUS:77952312300

VL - 210

SP - 855

EP - 859

JO - Journal of the American College of Surgeons

JF - Journal of the American College of Surgeons

SN - 1072-7515

IS - 5

ER -