Electronic structure of exohedral interactions between C60 and transition metals

Dennis L Lichtenberger, Laura L. Wright, Nadine E. Gruhn, Margaret E. Rempe

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

33 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The electron distribution and orbital interactions of C60 with metals coordinated at different sites on the outside of the fullerene are evaluated. These sites include the position of a metal atom directly above a carbon atom (η1 site), the metal atom centered above two carbons of a pentagon or above two carbons between two pentagons (both η2 sites), the metal atom centered above a pentagon (η5 site), and the metal atom centered above a hexagon (η6 site). The frontier orbitals of C60 are illustrated first with three-dimensional orbital contour plots. A palladium atom is then used to probe the bonding at the different sites on the C60 surface. The results with Pd0 are compared to our earlier study with the harder Ag+ ion in order to examine the effects of metal electron richness and size. In addition, these results are compared with the bonding to more traditional ligands that represent the hapticity of these sites, such as methyl (η1), ethylene (η2), cyclopentadienyl (η5), and benzene (η6). The strength of the metal-C60 interaction and the amount of charge delocalized from the metal to C60 is sensitive to the site of coordination, the electron richness of the metal, and distortions in the geometry of C60. As discussed in our previous work, the frontier orbitals of C60 are well-suited for synergistic bonding of a metal atom to a carbon-carbon pair in an alkene-like fashion, in which the HOMO of C60 donates carbon-carbon π bonding electron density to the metal, and the LUMO of C60 accepts electron density from the metal into a carbon-carbon π* antibonding orbital. Although the HOMO and LUMO of C60 describe the basic interaction, many frontier orbitals are involved. The site above the CC bond between two pentagons is favored over the site above the CC bond within a pentagon, and the interaction above the other sites is indicated to be net repulsive by these calculations. The differentiation between these sites increases with the electron richness of the metal center. The bonding of the metal to C60 is generally weaker than to the small ligands, except for very electron rich metal centers where the bonding to the η2 site between pentagons apparently becomes stronger than the bonding to ethylene.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)213-221
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Organometallic Chemistry
Volume478
Issue number1-2
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 20 1994

Fingerprint

Electronic structure
Transition metals
Metals
transition metals
electronic structure
Carbon
metals
interactions
carbon
Electrons
Atoms
orbitals
atoms
Carrier concentration
Ethylene
ethylene
electrons
Ligands
Fullerenes
electron orbitals

Keywords

  • Electronic structure
  • Fullerenes
  • Molecular orbital
  • Palladium
  • Silver
  • Transition metals

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biochemistry
  • Chemical Engineering (miscellaneous)
  • Inorganic Chemistry
  • Organic Chemistry
  • Physical and Theoretical Chemistry
  • Materials Science (miscellaneous)
  • Materials Chemistry

Cite this

Electronic structure of exohedral interactions between C60 and transition metals. / Lichtenberger, Dennis L; Wright, Laura L.; Gruhn, Nadine E.; Rempe, Margaret E.

In: Journal of Organometallic Chemistry, Vol. 478, No. 1-2, 20.09.1994, p. 213-221.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Lichtenberger, Dennis L ; Wright, Laura L. ; Gruhn, Nadine E. ; Rempe, Margaret E. / Electronic structure of exohedral interactions between C60 and transition metals. In: Journal of Organometallic Chemistry. 1994 ; Vol. 478, No. 1-2. pp. 213-221.
@article{184aeb5fa2274e99b918e3dcce1abf01,
title = "Electronic structure of exohedral interactions between C60 and transition metals",
abstract = "The electron distribution and orbital interactions of C60 with metals coordinated at different sites on the outside of the fullerene are evaluated. These sites include the position of a metal atom directly above a carbon atom (η1 site), the metal atom centered above two carbons of a pentagon or above two carbons between two pentagons (both η2 sites), the metal atom centered above a pentagon (η5 site), and the metal atom centered above a hexagon (η6 site). The frontier orbitals of C60 are illustrated first with three-dimensional orbital contour plots. A palladium atom is then used to probe the bonding at the different sites on the C60 surface. The results with Pd0 are compared to our earlier study with the harder Ag+ ion in order to examine the effects of metal electron richness and size. In addition, these results are compared with the bonding to more traditional ligands that represent the hapticity of these sites, such as methyl (η1), ethylene (η2), cyclopentadienyl (η5), and benzene (η6). The strength of the metal-C60 interaction and the amount of charge delocalized from the metal to C60 is sensitive to the site of coordination, the electron richness of the metal, and distortions in the geometry of C60. As discussed in our previous work, the frontier orbitals of C60 are well-suited for synergistic bonding of a metal atom to a carbon-carbon pair in an alkene-like fashion, in which the HOMO of C60 donates carbon-carbon π bonding electron density to the metal, and the LUMO of C60 accepts electron density from the metal into a carbon-carbon π* antibonding orbital. Although the HOMO and LUMO of C60 describe the basic interaction, many frontier orbitals are involved. The site above the CC bond between two pentagons is favored over the site above the CC bond within a pentagon, and the interaction above the other sites is indicated to be net repulsive by these calculations. The differentiation between these sites increases with the electron richness of the metal center. The bonding of the metal to C60 is generally weaker than to the small ligands, except for very electron rich metal centers where the bonding to the η2 site between pentagons apparently becomes stronger than the bonding to ethylene.",
keywords = "Electronic structure, Fullerenes, Molecular orbital, Palladium, Silver, Transition metals",
author = "Lichtenberger, {Dennis L} and Wright, {Laura L.} and Gruhn, {Nadine E.} and Rempe, {Margaret E.}",
year = "1994",
month = "9",
day = "20",
doi = "10.1016/0022-328X(94)88174-X",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "478",
pages = "213--221",
journal = "Journal of Organometallic Chemistry",
issn = "0022-328X",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "1-2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Electronic structure of exohedral interactions between C60 and transition metals

AU - Lichtenberger, Dennis L

AU - Wright, Laura L.

AU - Gruhn, Nadine E.

AU - Rempe, Margaret E.

PY - 1994/9/20

Y1 - 1994/9/20

N2 - The electron distribution and orbital interactions of C60 with metals coordinated at different sites on the outside of the fullerene are evaluated. These sites include the position of a metal atom directly above a carbon atom (η1 site), the metal atom centered above two carbons of a pentagon or above two carbons between two pentagons (both η2 sites), the metal atom centered above a pentagon (η5 site), and the metal atom centered above a hexagon (η6 site). The frontier orbitals of C60 are illustrated first with three-dimensional orbital contour plots. A palladium atom is then used to probe the bonding at the different sites on the C60 surface. The results with Pd0 are compared to our earlier study with the harder Ag+ ion in order to examine the effects of metal electron richness and size. In addition, these results are compared with the bonding to more traditional ligands that represent the hapticity of these sites, such as methyl (η1), ethylene (η2), cyclopentadienyl (η5), and benzene (η6). The strength of the metal-C60 interaction and the amount of charge delocalized from the metal to C60 is sensitive to the site of coordination, the electron richness of the metal, and distortions in the geometry of C60. As discussed in our previous work, the frontier orbitals of C60 are well-suited for synergistic bonding of a metal atom to a carbon-carbon pair in an alkene-like fashion, in which the HOMO of C60 donates carbon-carbon π bonding electron density to the metal, and the LUMO of C60 accepts electron density from the metal into a carbon-carbon π* antibonding orbital. Although the HOMO and LUMO of C60 describe the basic interaction, many frontier orbitals are involved. The site above the CC bond between two pentagons is favored over the site above the CC bond within a pentagon, and the interaction above the other sites is indicated to be net repulsive by these calculations. The differentiation between these sites increases with the electron richness of the metal center. The bonding of the metal to C60 is generally weaker than to the small ligands, except for very electron rich metal centers where the bonding to the η2 site between pentagons apparently becomes stronger than the bonding to ethylene.

AB - The electron distribution and orbital interactions of C60 with metals coordinated at different sites on the outside of the fullerene are evaluated. These sites include the position of a metal atom directly above a carbon atom (η1 site), the metal atom centered above two carbons of a pentagon or above two carbons between two pentagons (both η2 sites), the metal atom centered above a pentagon (η5 site), and the metal atom centered above a hexagon (η6 site). The frontier orbitals of C60 are illustrated first with three-dimensional orbital contour plots. A palladium atom is then used to probe the bonding at the different sites on the C60 surface. The results with Pd0 are compared to our earlier study with the harder Ag+ ion in order to examine the effects of metal electron richness and size. In addition, these results are compared with the bonding to more traditional ligands that represent the hapticity of these sites, such as methyl (η1), ethylene (η2), cyclopentadienyl (η5), and benzene (η6). The strength of the metal-C60 interaction and the amount of charge delocalized from the metal to C60 is sensitive to the site of coordination, the electron richness of the metal, and distortions in the geometry of C60. As discussed in our previous work, the frontier orbitals of C60 are well-suited for synergistic bonding of a metal atom to a carbon-carbon pair in an alkene-like fashion, in which the HOMO of C60 donates carbon-carbon π bonding electron density to the metal, and the LUMO of C60 accepts electron density from the metal into a carbon-carbon π* antibonding orbital. Although the HOMO and LUMO of C60 describe the basic interaction, many frontier orbitals are involved. The site above the CC bond between two pentagons is favored over the site above the CC bond within a pentagon, and the interaction above the other sites is indicated to be net repulsive by these calculations. The differentiation between these sites increases with the electron richness of the metal center. The bonding of the metal to C60 is generally weaker than to the small ligands, except for very electron rich metal centers where the bonding to the η2 site between pentagons apparently becomes stronger than the bonding to ethylene.

KW - Electronic structure

KW - Fullerenes

KW - Molecular orbital

KW - Palladium

KW - Silver

KW - Transition metals

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0038509069&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0038509069&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/0022-328X(94)88174-X

DO - 10.1016/0022-328X(94)88174-X

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0038509069

VL - 478

SP - 213

EP - 221

JO - Journal of Organometallic Chemistry

JF - Journal of Organometallic Chemistry

SN - 0022-328X

IS - 1-2

ER -