Emergency Department Workload Increase

Dependence on Primary Care?

Kim E. Tranquada, Kurt R Denninghoff, Melanie E. King, Stephen M. Davis, Peter Rosen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

18 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Increasing demand for emergency care and crowded emergency departments (EDs) lead some planners to conclude that inconvenient primary care scheduling increases the number of "unnecessary" ED visits. The reasons that the planners argue for more primary care are: to increase funding for primary care; the unfounded notion that it is less expensive to see a primary care physician (PCP) than an Emergency Physician; and the impractical goal that the ED should be used only by intellectually interesting life- or limb-threatened patients or "true emergencies." Objective: To explore the rates of patient-reported access to primary care in ambulatory presentations to a rural tertiary care ED. Methods: An observational study was performed in which an anonymous survey was given to a convenience sample of patients who presented by walking into the ED. Results: Overall, 70.4% (686/975) of respondents stated that they had a PCP, and 38.1 % (252/661) of the sample had attempted to contact their physicians before presenting to the ED. Of the group who attempted to contact their physicians, 62.8% (130) were neither spoken to nor seen by any doctor. These rates did not change by time of presentation or by day of the week. Conclusion: The results suggest that it is neither a lack of primary care, nor the time of day or night that drives patients to come to the ED.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)279-285
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Emergency Medicine
Volume38
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2010

Fingerprint

Workload
Hospital Emergency Service
Primary Health Care
Primary Care Physicians
Physicians
Emergencies
Emergency Medical Services
Tertiary Healthcare
Walking
Observational Studies
Extremities

Keywords

  • access
  • ED visits
  • primary care

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Emergency Medicine

Cite this

Emergency Department Workload Increase : Dependence on Primary Care? / Tranquada, Kim E.; Denninghoff, Kurt R; King, Melanie E.; Davis, Stephen M.; Rosen, Peter.

In: Journal of Emergency Medicine, Vol. 38, No. 3, 04.2010, p. 279-285.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Tranquada, Kim E. ; Denninghoff, Kurt R ; King, Melanie E. ; Davis, Stephen M. ; Rosen, Peter. / Emergency Department Workload Increase : Dependence on Primary Care?. In: Journal of Emergency Medicine. 2010 ; Vol. 38, No. 3. pp. 279-285.
@article{17f88afbc6224859b5cb1e8942672ade,
title = "Emergency Department Workload Increase: Dependence on Primary Care?",
abstract = "Background: Increasing demand for emergency care and crowded emergency departments (EDs) lead some planners to conclude that inconvenient primary care scheduling increases the number of {"}unnecessary{"} ED visits. The reasons that the planners argue for more primary care are: to increase funding for primary care; the unfounded notion that it is less expensive to see a primary care physician (PCP) than an Emergency Physician; and the impractical goal that the ED should be used only by intellectually interesting life- or limb-threatened patients or {"}true emergencies.{"} Objective: To explore the rates of patient-reported access to primary care in ambulatory presentations to a rural tertiary care ED. Methods: An observational study was performed in which an anonymous survey was given to a convenience sample of patients who presented by walking into the ED. Results: Overall, 70.4{\%} (686/975) of respondents stated that they had a PCP, and 38.1 {\%} (252/661) of the sample had attempted to contact their physicians before presenting to the ED. Of the group who attempted to contact their physicians, 62.8{\%} (130) were neither spoken to nor seen by any doctor. These rates did not change by time of presentation or by day of the week. Conclusion: The results suggest that it is neither a lack of primary care, nor the time of day or night that drives patients to come to the ED.",
keywords = "access, ED visits, primary care",
author = "Tranquada, {Kim E.} and Denninghoff, {Kurt R} and King, {Melanie E.} and Davis, {Stephen M.} and Peter Rosen",
year = "2010",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1016/j.jemermed.2008.11.031",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "38",
pages = "279--285",
journal = "Journal of Emergency Medicine",
issn = "0736-4679",
publisher = "Elsevier USA",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Emergency Department Workload Increase

T2 - Dependence on Primary Care?

AU - Tranquada, Kim E.

AU - Denninghoff, Kurt R

AU - King, Melanie E.

AU - Davis, Stephen M.

AU - Rosen, Peter

PY - 2010/4

Y1 - 2010/4

N2 - Background: Increasing demand for emergency care and crowded emergency departments (EDs) lead some planners to conclude that inconvenient primary care scheduling increases the number of "unnecessary" ED visits. The reasons that the planners argue for more primary care are: to increase funding for primary care; the unfounded notion that it is less expensive to see a primary care physician (PCP) than an Emergency Physician; and the impractical goal that the ED should be used only by intellectually interesting life- or limb-threatened patients or "true emergencies." Objective: To explore the rates of patient-reported access to primary care in ambulatory presentations to a rural tertiary care ED. Methods: An observational study was performed in which an anonymous survey was given to a convenience sample of patients who presented by walking into the ED. Results: Overall, 70.4% (686/975) of respondents stated that they had a PCP, and 38.1 % (252/661) of the sample had attempted to contact their physicians before presenting to the ED. Of the group who attempted to contact their physicians, 62.8% (130) were neither spoken to nor seen by any doctor. These rates did not change by time of presentation or by day of the week. Conclusion: The results suggest that it is neither a lack of primary care, nor the time of day or night that drives patients to come to the ED.

AB - Background: Increasing demand for emergency care and crowded emergency departments (EDs) lead some planners to conclude that inconvenient primary care scheduling increases the number of "unnecessary" ED visits. The reasons that the planners argue for more primary care are: to increase funding for primary care; the unfounded notion that it is less expensive to see a primary care physician (PCP) than an Emergency Physician; and the impractical goal that the ED should be used only by intellectually interesting life- or limb-threatened patients or "true emergencies." Objective: To explore the rates of patient-reported access to primary care in ambulatory presentations to a rural tertiary care ED. Methods: An observational study was performed in which an anonymous survey was given to a convenience sample of patients who presented by walking into the ED. Results: Overall, 70.4% (686/975) of respondents stated that they had a PCP, and 38.1 % (252/661) of the sample had attempted to contact their physicians before presenting to the ED. Of the group who attempted to contact their physicians, 62.8% (130) were neither spoken to nor seen by any doctor. These rates did not change by time of presentation or by day of the week. Conclusion: The results suggest that it is neither a lack of primary care, nor the time of day or night that drives patients to come to the ED.

KW - access

KW - ED visits

KW - primary care

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77949913952&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77949913952&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jemermed.2008.11.031

DO - 10.1016/j.jemermed.2008.11.031

M3 - Article

VL - 38

SP - 279

EP - 285

JO - Journal of Emergency Medicine

JF - Journal of Emergency Medicine

SN - 0736-4679

IS - 3

ER -