Emergency Physician Interpretation of Prehospital, Paramedic-Acquired Electrocardiograms

Jeffrey A. Schaffer, Terence D Valenzuela, Lani Clark, Riemke M. Brakema, Daniel W Spaite

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Hypothesis: Emergency physician interpretation of prehospital, paramedic-acquired, electrocardiograms (ECG) is accurate judged by comparison with that of a reference cardiologist. Methods: Twelve-lead ECGs were obtained by paramedics in the field from 150 patients with acute chest pain. The ECGs were transmitted by cellular telephone to a central location. Each ECG was assessed for evidence of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) by: 1) a third-year, emergency medicine resident (EMP-R); 2) a residency-trained, board-certified, emergency physician (EMP-RT); 3) an emergency physician board certified under the practice option (EMP-PT); and 4) a board-certified cardiologist. Agreement between each emergency physician and the cardiologist was assessed by the kappa statistic. Hospital records were reviewed for final diagnosis of each patient. Results: Sixteen of 150 (10.7%) patients received a hospital discharge diagnosis of AMI. Sensitivity of physician interpretation ranged from 0.31 to 0.56. All physicians achieved specificity of 0.99. Falsepositive rates for the physicians ranged from 0.18—0.29. The mean positive predictive value for the four physicians was 0.77+0.05; the mean negative predictive value was 0.94±0.01. The total agreements between the EMP-R, EMP-RT, and EMP-PT and the cardiologists were 0.97, 0.96, and 0.97, respectively. Kappa values for agreement between the emergency physicians and the cardiologist ranged from 0.65-0.79. Conclusions: Residency-trained or board-certified emergency physician interpretations of prehospital, paramedic-acquired 12-lead ECGs show a high degree of agreement with reference cardiologist interpretations.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)251-255
Number of pages5
JournalPrehospital and Disaster Medicine
Volume7
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 1992

Fingerprint

Allied Health Personnel
Electrocardiography
Emergencies
Physicians
Internship and Residency
Myocardial Infarction
Cell Phones
Hospital Records
Emergency Medicine
Acute Pain
Chest Pain
Cardiologists

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Emergency
  • Emergency Medicine

Cite this

Emergency Physician Interpretation of Prehospital, Paramedic-Acquired Electrocardiograms. / Schaffer, Jeffrey A.; Valenzuela, Terence D; Clark, Lani; Brakema, Riemke M.; Spaite, Daniel W.

In: Prehospital and Disaster Medicine, Vol. 7, No. 3, 1992, p. 251-255.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{4bb21da10fb848668a765f22144ec5a8,
title = "Emergency Physician Interpretation of Prehospital, Paramedic-Acquired Electrocardiograms",
abstract = "Hypothesis: Emergency physician interpretation of prehospital, paramedic-acquired, electrocardiograms (ECG) is accurate judged by comparison with that of a reference cardiologist. Methods: Twelve-lead ECGs were obtained by paramedics in the field from 150 patients with acute chest pain. The ECGs were transmitted by cellular telephone to a central location. Each ECG was assessed for evidence of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) by: 1) a third-year, emergency medicine resident (EMP-R); 2) a residency-trained, board-certified, emergency physician (EMP-RT); 3) an emergency physician board certified under the practice option (EMP-PT); and 4) a board-certified cardiologist. Agreement between each emergency physician and the cardiologist was assessed by the kappa statistic. Hospital records were reviewed for final diagnosis of each patient. Results: Sixteen of 150 (10.7{\%}) patients received a hospital discharge diagnosis of AMI. Sensitivity of physician interpretation ranged from 0.31 to 0.56. All physicians achieved specificity of 0.99. Falsepositive rates for the physicians ranged from 0.18—0.29. The mean positive predictive value for the four physicians was 0.77+0.05; the mean negative predictive value was 0.94±0.01. The total agreements between the EMP-R, EMP-RT, and EMP-PT and the cardiologists were 0.97, 0.96, and 0.97, respectively. Kappa values for agreement between the emergency physicians and the cardiologist ranged from 0.65-0.79. Conclusions: Residency-trained or board-certified emergency physician interpretations of prehospital, paramedic-acquired 12-lead ECGs show a high degree of agreement with reference cardiologist interpretations.",
author = "Schaffer, {Jeffrey A.} and Valenzuela, {Terence D} and Lani Clark and Brakema, {Riemke M.} and Spaite, {Daniel W}",
year = "1992",
doi = "10.1017/S1049023X00039583",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "7",
pages = "251--255",
journal = "Prehospital and Disaster Medicine",
issn = "1049-023X",
publisher = "World Association for Disaster and Emergency Medicine",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Emergency Physician Interpretation of Prehospital, Paramedic-Acquired Electrocardiograms

AU - Schaffer, Jeffrey A.

AU - Valenzuela, Terence D

AU - Clark, Lani

AU - Brakema, Riemke M.

AU - Spaite, Daniel W

PY - 1992

Y1 - 1992

N2 - Hypothesis: Emergency physician interpretation of prehospital, paramedic-acquired, electrocardiograms (ECG) is accurate judged by comparison with that of a reference cardiologist. Methods: Twelve-lead ECGs were obtained by paramedics in the field from 150 patients with acute chest pain. The ECGs were transmitted by cellular telephone to a central location. Each ECG was assessed for evidence of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) by: 1) a third-year, emergency medicine resident (EMP-R); 2) a residency-trained, board-certified, emergency physician (EMP-RT); 3) an emergency physician board certified under the practice option (EMP-PT); and 4) a board-certified cardiologist. Agreement between each emergency physician and the cardiologist was assessed by the kappa statistic. Hospital records were reviewed for final diagnosis of each patient. Results: Sixteen of 150 (10.7%) patients received a hospital discharge diagnosis of AMI. Sensitivity of physician interpretation ranged from 0.31 to 0.56. All physicians achieved specificity of 0.99. Falsepositive rates for the physicians ranged from 0.18—0.29. The mean positive predictive value for the four physicians was 0.77+0.05; the mean negative predictive value was 0.94±0.01. The total agreements between the EMP-R, EMP-RT, and EMP-PT and the cardiologists were 0.97, 0.96, and 0.97, respectively. Kappa values for agreement between the emergency physicians and the cardiologist ranged from 0.65-0.79. Conclusions: Residency-trained or board-certified emergency physician interpretations of prehospital, paramedic-acquired 12-lead ECGs show a high degree of agreement with reference cardiologist interpretations.

AB - Hypothesis: Emergency physician interpretation of prehospital, paramedic-acquired, electrocardiograms (ECG) is accurate judged by comparison with that of a reference cardiologist. Methods: Twelve-lead ECGs were obtained by paramedics in the field from 150 patients with acute chest pain. The ECGs were transmitted by cellular telephone to a central location. Each ECG was assessed for evidence of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) by: 1) a third-year, emergency medicine resident (EMP-R); 2) a residency-trained, board-certified, emergency physician (EMP-RT); 3) an emergency physician board certified under the practice option (EMP-PT); and 4) a board-certified cardiologist. Agreement between each emergency physician and the cardiologist was assessed by the kappa statistic. Hospital records were reviewed for final diagnosis of each patient. Results: Sixteen of 150 (10.7%) patients received a hospital discharge diagnosis of AMI. Sensitivity of physician interpretation ranged from 0.31 to 0.56. All physicians achieved specificity of 0.99. Falsepositive rates for the physicians ranged from 0.18—0.29. The mean positive predictive value for the four physicians was 0.77+0.05; the mean negative predictive value was 0.94±0.01. The total agreements between the EMP-R, EMP-RT, and EMP-PT and the cardiologists were 0.97, 0.96, and 0.97, respectively. Kappa values for agreement between the emergency physicians and the cardiologist ranged from 0.65-0.79. Conclusions: Residency-trained or board-certified emergency physician interpretations of prehospital, paramedic-acquired 12-lead ECGs show a high degree of agreement with reference cardiologist interpretations.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84971809032&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84971809032&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1017/S1049023X00039583

DO - 10.1017/S1049023X00039583

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84971809032

VL - 7

SP - 251

EP - 255

JO - Prehospital and Disaster Medicine

JF - Prehospital and Disaster Medicine

SN - 1049-023X

IS - 3

ER -