Emotion, Decision, and Risk: Betting on Gambles versus Betting on People

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

51 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We examined the effects of two emotions, fear and anger, on risk-taking behavior in two types of tasks: Those in which uncertainty is generated by a randomizing device ("lottery risk") and those in which it is generated by the uncertain behavior of another person ("person-based risk"). Participants first completed a writing task to induce fear or anger. They then made choices either between lotteries (Experiment 1) or between actions in risky two-person decisions (Experiments 2 and 3). The experiments involved substantial real-money payoffs. Replicating earlier studies (which used hypothetical rewards), Experiment 1 showed that fearful participants were more risk-averse than angry participants in lottery-risk tasks. However-the key result of this study-fearful participants were substantially less risk-averse than angry participants in a two-person task involving person-based risk (Experiment 2). Experiment 3 offered options and payoffs identical to those of Experiment 2 but with lottery-type risk. Risk-taking returned to the pattern of Experiment 1. The impact of incidental emotions on risk-taking appears to be contingent on the class of uncertainty involved. For lottery risk, fear increased the frequency of risk-averse choices and anger reduced it. The reverse pattern was found when uncertainty in the decision was person-based. Further, the effect was specifically on differences in willingness to take risks rather than on differences in judgments of how much risk was present. The impact of different emotions on risk-taking or risk-avoiding behavior is thus contingent on the type, as well as the degree, of uncertainty the decision maker faces.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)123-134
Number of pages12
JournalJournal of Behavioral Decision Making
Volume25
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2012

Fingerprint

Emotions
emotion
Risk-Taking
Uncertainty
experiment
Anger
human being
Fear
anger
uncertainty
Betting
Emotion
Gambles
Experiment
anxiety
Lottery
Reward
Person
risk behavior
reward

Keywords

  • Appraisal-tendency framework
  • Emotions
  • Individual decision making
  • Interactive decision making
  • Risk

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Applied Psychology
  • Decision Sciences(all)
  • Strategy and Management
  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)

Cite this

@article{d30831075eb948cfba3b4c0abbd701a5,
title = "Emotion, Decision, and Risk: Betting on Gambles versus Betting on People",
abstract = "We examined the effects of two emotions, fear and anger, on risk-taking behavior in two types of tasks: Those in which uncertainty is generated by a randomizing device ({"}lottery risk{"}) and those in which it is generated by the uncertain behavior of another person ({"}person-based risk{"}). Participants first completed a writing task to induce fear or anger. They then made choices either between lotteries (Experiment 1) or between actions in risky two-person decisions (Experiments 2 and 3). The experiments involved substantial real-money payoffs. Replicating earlier studies (which used hypothetical rewards), Experiment 1 showed that fearful participants were more risk-averse than angry participants in lottery-risk tasks. However-the key result of this study-fearful participants were substantially less risk-averse than angry participants in a two-person task involving person-based risk (Experiment 2). Experiment 3 offered options and payoffs identical to those of Experiment 2 but with lottery-type risk. Risk-taking returned to the pattern of Experiment 1. The impact of incidental emotions on risk-taking appears to be contingent on the class of uncertainty involved. For lottery risk, fear increased the frequency of risk-averse choices and anger reduced it. The reverse pattern was found when uncertainty in the decision was person-based. Further, the effect was specifically on differences in willingness to take risks rather than on differences in judgments of how much risk was present. The impact of different emotions on risk-taking or risk-avoiding behavior is thus contingent on the type, as well as the degree, of uncertainty the decision maker faces.",
keywords = "Appraisal-tendency framework, Emotions, Individual decision making, Interactive decision making, Risk",
author = "Tamar Kugler and Terence Connolly and Ordonez, {Lisa D}",
year = "2012",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1002/bdm.724",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "25",
pages = "123--134",
journal = "Journal of Behavioral Decision Making",
issn = "0894-3257",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Ltd",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Emotion, Decision, and Risk

T2 - Betting on Gambles versus Betting on People

AU - Kugler, Tamar

AU - Connolly, Terence

AU - Ordonez, Lisa D

PY - 2012/4

Y1 - 2012/4

N2 - We examined the effects of two emotions, fear and anger, on risk-taking behavior in two types of tasks: Those in which uncertainty is generated by a randomizing device ("lottery risk") and those in which it is generated by the uncertain behavior of another person ("person-based risk"). Participants first completed a writing task to induce fear or anger. They then made choices either between lotteries (Experiment 1) or between actions in risky two-person decisions (Experiments 2 and 3). The experiments involved substantial real-money payoffs. Replicating earlier studies (which used hypothetical rewards), Experiment 1 showed that fearful participants were more risk-averse than angry participants in lottery-risk tasks. However-the key result of this study-fearful participants were substantially less risk-averse than angry participants in a two-person task involving person-based risk (Experiment 2). Experiment 3 offered options and payoffs identical to those of Experiment 2 but with lottery-type risk. Risk-taking returned to the pattern of Experiment 1. The impact of incidental emotions on risk-taking appears to be contingent on the class of uncertainty involved. For lottery risk, fear increased the frequency of risk-averse choices and anger reduced it. The reverse pattern was found when uncertainty in the decision was person-based. Further, the effect was specifically on differences in willingness to take risks rather than on differences in judgments of how much risk was present. The impact of different emotions on risk-taking or risk-avoiding behavior is thus contingent on the type, as well as the degree, of uncertainty the decision maker faces.

AB - We examined the effects of two emotions, fear and anger, on risk-taking behavior in two types of tasks: Those in which uncertainty is generated by a randomizing device ("lottery risk") and those in which it is generated by the uncertain behavior of another person ("person-based risk"). Participants first completed a writing task to induce fear or anger. They then made choices either between lotteries (Experiment 1) or between actions in risky two-person decisions (Experiments 2 and 3). The experiments involved substantial real-money payoffs. Replicating earlier studies (which used hypothetical rewards), Experiment 1 showed that fearful participants were more risk-averse than angry participants in lottery-risk tasks. However-the key result of this study-fearful participants were substantially less risk-averse than angry participants in a two-person task involving person-based risk (Experiment 2). Experiment 3 offered options and payoffs identical to those of Experiment 2 but with lottery-type risk. Risk-taking returned to the pattern of Experiment 1. The impact of incidental emotions on risk-taking appears to be contingent on the class of uncertainty involved. For lottery risk, fear increased the frequency of risk-averse choices and anger reduced it. The reverse pattern was found when uncertainty in the decision was person-based. Further, the effect was specifically on differences in willingness to take risks rather than on differences in judgments of how much risk was present. The impact of different emotions on risk-taking or risk-avoiding behavior is thus contingent on the type, as well as the degree, of uncertainty the decision maker faces.

KW - Appraisal-tendency framework

KW - Emotions

KW - Individual decision making

KW - Interactive decision making

KW - Risk

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84858688992&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84858688992&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/bdm.724

DO - 10.1002/bdm.724

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84858688992

VL - 25

SP - 123

EP - 134

JO - Journal of Behavioral Decision Making

JF - Journal of Behavioral Decision Making

SN - 0894-3257

IS - 2

ER -