Empirical justification and defeasibility

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Two truisms about empirical justification are that experience plays a crucial role in it (hence the name) and that it is defeasible. There are, of course, different ways of developing these truisms into philosophical theories. I favor one particular view about the role of experience in empirical justification which may be thought to lead to problems in accommodating its defeasibility. My aim in this paper is to argue that the problems are illusory, based on an entrenched misconception how defeaters work.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1-16
Number of pages16
JournalSynthese
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Jul 9 2018

Fingerprint

experience
Justification
Defeasibility
Philosophical Theories
Defeaters
Misconceptions
Names

Keywords

  • Defeaters
  • Empirical justification
  • Experience

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Philosophy
  • Social Sciences(all)

Cite this

Empirical justification and defeasibility. / Comesana, Juan M.

In: Synthese, 09.07.2018, p. 1-16.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{4e104ea817db4edba30d738c03e20d41,
title = "Empirical justification and defeasibility",
abstract = "Two truisms about empirical justification are that experience plays a crucial role in it (hence the name) and that it is defeasible. There are, of course, different ways of developing these truisms into philosophical theories. I favor one particular view about the role of experience in empirical justification which may be thought to lead to problems in accommodating its defeasibility. My aim in this paper is to argue that the problems are illusory, based on an entrenched misconception how defeaters work.",
keywords = "Defeaters, Empirical justification, Experience",
author = "Comesana, {Juan M}",
year = "2018",
month = "7",
day = "9",
doi = "10.1007/s11229-018-1865-x",
language = "English (US)",
pages = "1--16",
journal = "Synthese",
issn = "0039-7857",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Empirical justification and defeasibility

AU - Comesana, Juan M

PY - 2018/7/9

Y1 - 2018/7/9

N2 - Two truisms about empirical justification are that experience plays a crucial role in it (hence the name) and that it is defeasible. There are, of course, different ways of developing these truisms into philosophical theories. I favor one particular view about the role of experience in empirical justification which may be thought to lead to problems in accommodating its defeasibility. My aim in this paper is to argue that the problems are illusory, based on an entrenched misconception how defeaters work.

AB - Two truisms about empirical justification are that experience plays a crucial role in it (hence the name) and that it is defeasible. There are, of course, different ways of developing these truisms into philosophical theories. I favor one particular view about the role of experience in empirical justification which may be thought to lead to problems in accommodating its defeasibility. My aim in this paper is to argue that the problems are illusory, based on an entrenched misconception how defeaters work.

KW - Defeaters

KW - Empirical justification

KW - Experience

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85049642470&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85049642470&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s11229-018-1865-x

DO - 10.1007/s11229-018-1865-x

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85049642470

SP - 1

EP - 16

JO - Synthese

JF - Synthese

SN - 0039-7857

ER -